From: William Sommerwerck on
I don't know if it was to this group, or not, but I recently posted a remark
averring that all third-party lithium-ion batteries -- even from well-known
companies -- were junk, and a waste of money. (They are.)

I can't speak for nicad or NiMH battery packs, as I've never bought
third-party replacements. (OEM replacements have always been first-rate.)
But the prices companies want for replacements are often insane.

I've never seen a cordless phone with unwired ("loose") cells that could be
easily interchanged. Part of the reason might be legitimate safety concerns,
* but most of it is simple greed. It appears that manufacturers insist on
selling a battery pack they can profit from down the line.

You might consider tack-soldering the old leads to new cells. This can be
tricky, as you don't want to overheat the cells.

* I have a thin Sony Discman that takes two AA cells. There's nothing to
prevent you from recharging any AA cells you put in the unit, and I've
successfully recharged other brands.


From: Buerste on

"Ignoramus20496" <ignoramus20496(a)NOSPAM.20496.invalid> wrote in message
news:IMudnTF1LOmhBKjWnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>I would like to know if my cell phone battery situation is of general
> nature, or perhaps I had very unusual bad luck.
>
> We have a Uniden cordless phone system that works very well, except
> that original batteries (BT-0003) have gone bad over the years.
>
> Attempts to replace them with "Non-OEM", "Equivalent" bateries did not
> work well, basically those are junk that is falsely advertised. The
> sellers simply know that the batteries are uneconomical to return, so
> they sell junk that will not hold charge.
<snip>

On the other hand, I replaced the batteries in 2 Motorola cordless phones
with batteries I bought on Ebay from China for 2/$1.00 + $3 shipping. They
hold a charge noticeably longer than the OEM which worked just fine. I
guess I just got lucky.

From: hr(bob) hofmann on
On Dec 25, 11:03 pm, Ignoramus20496 <ignoramus20...(a)NOSPAM.
20496.invalid> wrote:
> I would like to know if my cell phone battery situation is of general
> nature, or perhaps I had very unusual bad luck.
>
> We have a Uniden cordless phone system that works very well, except
> that original batteries (BT-0003) have gone bad over the years.
>
> Attempts to replace them with "Non-OEM", "Equivalent" bateries did not
> work well, basically those are junk that is falsely advertised. The
> sellers simply know that the batteries are uneconomical to return, so
> they sell junk that will not hold charge.
>
> This particular battery BT-0003 seems to be no longer available from
> Uniden. When it was available years ago, it cost as must as a new
> handset.
>
> That price relationship leads me to believe that cordless phone
> manufacturers purposely equip their phones with substandard batteries
> or charging circuits, in order to sell more cordless phones.
>
> I would like to know whether there is some "honest" cordless phone
> systems that, say, use rechargeable AA batteries or something like
> that that has easy, economical replacement, or where good replacement
> batteries are available from known honest sellers.
>
> Thanks
>
> i

Do you mean cordless phone or cellphone, they are two different
animals in how they use power?