From: William Sommerwerck on 26 Dec 2009 06:53 I don't know if it was to this group, or not, but I recently posted a remark averring that all third-party lithium-ion batteries -- even from well-known companies -- were junk, and a waste of money. (They are.) I can't speak for nicad or NiMH battery packs, as I've never bought third-party replacements. (OEM replacements have always been first-rate.) But the prices companies want for replacements are often insane. I've never seen a cordless phone with unwired ("loose") cells that could be easily interchanged. Part of the reason might be legitimate safety concerns, * but most of it is simple greed. It appears that manufacturers insist on selling a battery pack they can profit from down the line. You might consider tack-soldering the old leads to new cells. This can be tricky, as you don't want to overheat the cells. * I have a thin Sony Discman that takes two AA cells. There's nothing to prevent you from recharging any AA cells you put in the unit, and I've successfully recharged other brands.
From: Buerste on 26 Dec 2009 12:14 "Ignoramus20496" <ignoramus20496(a)NOSPAM.20496.invalid> wrote in message news:IMudnTF1LOmhBKjWnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >I would like to know if my cell phone battery situation is of general > nature, or perhaps I had very unusual bad luck. > > We have a Uniden cordless phone system that works very well, except > that original batteries (BT-0003) have gone bad over the years. > > Attempts to replace them with "Non-OEM", "Equivalent" bateries did not > work well, basically those are junk that is falsely advertised. The > sellers simply know that the batteries are uneconomical to return, so > they sell junk that will not hold charge. <snip> On the other hand, I replaced the batteries in 2 Motorola cordless phones with batteries I bought on Ebay from China for 2/$1.00 + $3 shipping. They hold a charge noticeably longer than the OEM which worked just fine. I guess I just got lucky.
From: hr(bob) hofmann on 26 Dec 2009 15:03 On Dec 25, 11:03 pm, Ignoramus20496 <ignoramus20...(a)NOSPAM. 20496.invalid> wrote: > I would like to know if my cell phone battery situation is of general > nature, or perhaps I had very unusual bad luck. > > We have a Uniden cordless phone system that works very well, except > that original batteries (BT-0003) have gone bad over the years. > > Attempts to replace them with "Non-OEM", "Equivalent" bateries did not > work well, basically those are junk that is falsely advertised. The > sellers simply know that the batteries are uneconomical to return, so > they sell junk that will not hold charge. > > This particular battery BT-0003 seems to be no longer available from > Uniden. When it was available years ago, it cost as must as a new > handset. > > That price relationship leads me to believe that cordless phone > manufacturers purposely equip their phones with substandard batteries > or charging circuits, in order to sell more cordless phones. > > I would like to know whether there is some "honest" cordless phone > systems that, say, use rechargeable AA batteries or something like > that that has easy, economical replacement, or where good replacement > batteries are available from known honest sellers. > > Thanks > > i Do you mean cordless phone or cellphone, they are two different animals in how they use power?
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ EVIL EYE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Next: How much power used when device is Off. |