Current rows etc
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Woody on 3 Jul 2010 22:24 Ian Piper <ianpiper(a)mac.com> wrote: > On 2010-07-03 23:41:07 +0100, usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk (Woody) said: > > > Ian Piper <ianpiper(a)mac.com> wrote: > > > > Don't you use auto-kill then? I don't have anyone killfiled at the > > moment (too many machines, I would need it on a server level but i don't > > have my own news server any more), but when I had CH and his other > > killfiled I always had autokill, which kills the original and any > > replies to it, as these things never recover. > > I don't know how to do auto-kill with Unison. Is it capable of doing that? I really don't know, I haven't used it. I would assume it has some kind of 'kill this post and all follow ups' option though? -- Woody www.alienrat.com
From: Chris Ridd on 4 Jul 2010 01:51 On 2010-07-04 03:24:29 +0100, Woody said: > Ian Piper <ianpiper(a)mac.com> wrote: >> On 2010-07-03 23:41:07 +0100, usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk (Woody) said: >> >>> Ian Piper <ianpiper(a)mac.com> wrote: >>> >>> Don't you use auto-kill then? I don't have anyone killfiled at the >>> moment (too many machines, I would need it on a server level but i don't >>> have my own news server any more), but when I had CH and his other >>> killfiled I always had autokill, which kills the original and any >>> replies to it, as these things never recover. >> >> I don't know how to do auto-kill with Unison. Is it capable of doing that? > I really don't know, I haven't used it. I would assume it has some kind > of 'kill this post and all follow ups' option though? In 1.x and 2.0 it just has a "Mark thread as Read" option. In a version being beta tested you can kill by reference to a message ID. The same beta test version does scoring, but it isn't clear how you'd do scoring in practice. Any scoring afficionados around who could offer suggestions? -- Chris
From: John DoH on 5 Jul 2010 04:14 In article <12ext73seibjr.pmffcgfaej7g.dlg(a)40tude.net>, Chris Holland <ilove(a)macs.com> wrote: > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:41:25 +0100, John DoH wrote: > > >> Rowland. > >> (look, I chose to post this, so an apology would not be meaningful. But > >> I really shouldn't have even written this, should I? I really, really, > >> really should learn to *not* poke DoH with a stick, because of what > >> happens when I do. Hey guys, maybe you could take that point on board > >> and see if you could work out if it applies to you? Is there someone > >> you habitually poke with a stick who reacts badly when you do? Maybe > >> you should stop it?) > > > > Rowland you little scamp, do you think any of your tormentors actually > > believe you:-), well maybe Beaky and the failed Mac supplier, but even > > those fops don't really believe anything you say:-)))) > > John, John.... what a parade of human folly. The incessant bickering about > who should kill file whom. And to top it off, the crowning glory, is > Rowlie's oft-repeated story about protecting a friend and drawing the > trolls' fire. The hypocrisy and self delusion is so intense you can taste > it. And then he insults his old mate Sarah, whom he protected from the > trolls, by saying she's a compulsive liar. Rowland, like Sarah, has never been known to let the truth get in the way of one of his fantasies. > > I think Rowlie likes you because he just can't stop replying to your posts. He is obsessed with me, for years he has told everyone how I am in his killfile, but he is far to obsessed to ever put anyone in a killfile:-) > I know he likes me because he's never said a bad word to me. It could all be so different if you were a woman, he doesn't suffer women gladly, I just wonder what brought about his dislike of them. > I think he's an all right chap. Yes, he is very entertaining. -- "Telling someone to kill themselves is not harmful: it's merely me expressing an opinion. You try to drive people to suicide - that's evil. My behaviour is perfectly okay; your behaviour is evil - plain and simple evil." Rowland McDonnell - 9th. Mar. 2009
From: Gwynne Harper on 5 Jul 2010 04:20 Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > I know what you mean, but really: they're not mine, honest. > > If they *WERE* mine, I'd've sent them all back to the factory to be > broken down into spares for repairs. Priceless; thanks for that, as it made me chuckle. Gwynne -- My real email is net, not line.
From: Gwynne Harper on 5 Jul 2010 04:20
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > > Good points and i'll just ignore him then. > > Count yourself lucky - I got the buttered radish. You had butter? Gwynne -- My real email is net, not line. |