Prev: EDK : *.bit and *.elf Files
Next: Embedded clocks
From: homoalteraiensis on 5 Aug 2006 17:18 I still discover a difference between the fmax for Cyclone I and Cyclone II. Is this caused by the DP-RAM bug with Cyclone II devices - let's say with the additional hardware produced by the work around?
From: Martin Schoeberl on 6 Aug 2006 05:19
>I still discover a difference between the fmax for Cyclone I and > Cyclone II. > > Is this caused by the DP-RAM bug with Cyclone II devices - > let's say with the additional hardware produced by the work around? > AFAIK the example I'm using (same data width on both ports) does not need the additional hardware. With different port widths, which I used first, I got the additional MUX inserted by Quartus. However, in my application I can tolerate some latency, so I will MUX the data (and demux) it in an extra pipeline stage. Martin |