Prev: KMDF : Synchronisation of USB continuous reader
Next: How Scsiport load class driver
From: Tim Roberts on 3 Oct 2009 21:49
"Don Burn" <burn(a)stopspam.windrvr.com> wrote:
>
>This is as close as I can get for versions.
>
>NT 3.1 DDK
>NT 3.5 DDK
>NT 3.5.1 DDK

Too many dots: just 3.51.

>NT 4.0 DDK
>Windows 2000 DDK

Right, DDKs up to this point did not use build numbers when they installed.

>Windows XP DDK

This was build 2600.

>Windows Server 2003 DDK Build 3790
>Windows Server 2003 SP1 DDK Build 3790.1830
>Windows Vista WDK Build 6000
>Windows Server 2008 WDK Build 6001.18000
>Windows 7 WDK Build 7600.16385

For completeness, one also might see in the wild 6001.18001 (which omitted
the broken KMDF co-installer) and 6001.18002 (which finally fixed it).
--
Tim Roberts, timr(a)probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
From: Don Burn on 4 Oct 2009 09:10
No on the CD's I have for the DDK


--
Don Burn (MVP, Windows DKD)
Windows Filesystem and Driver Consulting
Website: http://www.windrvr.com
Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr


"Tim Roberts" <timr(a)probo.com> wrote in message
news:7gvfc550uq4apujj76idvdl7cpigcmb73p(a)4ax.com...
> "Don Burn" <burn(a)stopspam.windrvr.com> wrote:
>>
>>This is as close as I can get for versions.
>>
>>NT 3.1 DDK
>>NT 3.5 DDK
>>NT 3.5.1 DDK
>
> Too many dots: just 3.51.
>
>>NT 4.0 DDK
>>Windows 2000 DDK
>
> Right, DDKs up to this point did not use build numbers when they
> installed.
>
>>Windows XP DDK
>
> This was build 2600.
>
>>Windows Server 2003 DDK Build 3790
>>Windows Server 2003 SP1 DDK Build 3790.1830
>>Windows Vista WDK Build 6000
>>Windows Server 2008 WDK Build 6001.18000
>>Windows 7 WDK Build 7600.16385
>
> For completeness, one also might see in the wild 6001.18001 (which omitted
> the broken KMDF co-installer) and 6001.18002 (which finally fixed it).
> --
> Tim Roberts, timr(a)probo.com
> Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4478 (20091003) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4478 (20091003) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




From: Kosta on 4 Oct 2009 10:35
Also the Win98 DDK.
From: Don Burn on 4 Oct 2009 10:57
Has anyone cared about 95, 98 or ME? Really a different OS that just had a
similar name.


--
Don Burn (MVP, Windows DKD)
Windows Filesystem and Driver Consulting
Website: http://www.windrvr.com
Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr
Remove StopSpam to reply



"Kosta" <kosta.koeman(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8207d76a-7ce2-49f3-a113-577e813407cc(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> Also the Win98 DDK.
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4478 (20091003) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4478 (20091003) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: KMDF : Synchronisation of USB continuous reader
Next: How Scsiport load class driver