Prev: SysAdmin from a smartphone
Next: She kissed me
From: Clogwog on 4 Jun 2010 13:07 "High Plains Thumper" <hpt(a)invalid.invalid> schreef in bericht news:hu9kdl$ut8$1(a)tornado.tornevall.net... > The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> philo wrote: >>> RayLopez99 wrote: >>> >>>> Some background on me: programmer in C#, some of my programs are >>>> run commercially, own my own business, heavy Windows user, very >>>> knowledgeable about PCs (built about a dozen for myself and >>>> friends from scratch, all Windows machines) hand RedHat Linux >>>> dual booted about 12 years ago with NT. >>>> >>>> I have an old Pentium II (1996 or so) with a tiny amount of RAM >>>> (about 26 MB!I think it says on bootup). >>>> >>>> Installed over a year ago DSL (ver. 4.2.5) on this old Pentium, >>>> which stands for Damn Small Linux. System was running Windows >>>> 2000 fine, >>> >>> <snip> total bull >>> >>> Win2k will not run with just 26 megs of RAM... even with 64 megs it >>> would be too slow to be useful >> >> I think what Ray means is that all it has left AFTER it boots up >> WinDoze. > > My venerable Dell Latitude C600 dual boot laptop with 850 MHz Intel > Mobile and 512 MB RAM takes a long time to boot up and boot down with > Windows 2000. To run Win2K on anything less would be insane, IMHO. > You Idiot, recommended minimum =128 MB, works like a charme on my old (1999) Armada laptop 160MB / 450 Mhz!
From: philo on 4 Jun 2010 14:31 On 06/04/2010 10:53 AM, RayLopez99 wrote: > On Jun 4, 1:26 pm, philo<ph...(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >> First off >> >> you lied >> >> you said it had 26 megs of ram >> >> now you've changed the number to 49 megs >> >> Though I am sure Win2k will eventually load with that amount of ram >> it's essentially unusable... >> especially considering a virus checker is required. >> >> I've set up hundreds of win2k machines and 128 megs is the minimum >> needed to actually have a "functional" machine > > Shutup shiite bag. See my answer to Mike Easter. > > What you here for, net nanny? You're not helping anybody. > > RL If you do not even know how to figure how much ram you have in your machine I seriously doubt you have the ability to do any trouble shooting. Since win2k works so well for you just go back to it and forget about Linux sheesh
From: philo on 4 Jun 2010 14:42 On 06/03/2010 07:33 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > philo wrote: >> On 06/03/2010 02:52 PM, RayLopez99 wrote: >>> Some background on me: programmer in C#, some of my programs are run >>> commercially, own my own business, heavy Windows user, very >>> knowledgeable about PCs (built about a dozen for myself and friends >>> from scratch, all Windows machines) hand RedHat Linux dual booted >>> about 12 years ago with NT. >>> >>> I have an old Pentium II (1996 or so) with a tiny amount of RAM (about >>> 26 MB!I think it says on bootup). >>> >>> Installed over a year ago DSL (ver. 4.2.5) on this old Pentium, which >>> stands for Damn Small Linux. System was running Windows 2000 fine, >>> >> >> >> <snip> >> >> total bull >> >> Win2k will not run with just 26 megs of RAM... >> even with 64 megs it would be too slow to be useful >> > I think what Ray means is that all it has left AFTER it boots up WinDoze. Once in a while I reply to stuff like that just to blow off a little steam after work... I am sure that's why he posts in the first place
From: RayLopez99 on 5 Jun 2010 19:59
On Jun 5, 6:27 pm, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > As much as Mr. Lopez acts like a troll, there is a small point from > this. First reports of hardware capabilities are often mistaken, not > maliciously, but because hardware behaves oddly or reports oddly. > Systems that use system RAM for their video displays, for example, > come up with some very odd RAM numbers indeed. Let's not hold folks on > comp.os.linux.setup to such tight reporting standards, because they > often don't know precisely how to verify such numbers. Right. I am reporting what the BIOS shows. I could take the case off and look to see how much memory I installed (since I built this system over 12 years ago) but I'm too lazy. RL |