Prev: SysAdmin from a smartphone
Next: She kissed me
From: RayLopez99 on 3 Jun 2010 15:52 Some background on me: programmer in C#, some of my programs are run commercially, own my own business, heavy Windows user, very knowledgeable about PCs (built about a dozen for myself and friends from scratch, all Windows machines) hand RedHat Linux dual booted about 12 years ago with NT. I have an old Pentium II (1996 or so) with a tiny amount of RAM (about 26 MB!I think it says on bootup). Installed over a year ago DSL (ver. 4.2.5) on this old Pentium, which stands for Damn Small Linux. System was running Windows 2000 fine, but it turned into a paperweight when DSL failed to recognize the CD- ROM. But, at that time, I thought I had it running OK. Turned it on now, over a year later, since I want to familiarize myself with Linux again (the myth is that all versions of Linux share a common ancestor, and since I might install Linux on another old machine for a lady who is computer illiterate, I figured this would be a good way to reacquaint myself with Linux). CD-ROM *is* now being recognized, but now the mouse is not. But in fairness to Linux, it might be a hardware problem. I have at the moment one of those automatic A/B switches (since my Windows XP machine and this old puter that has DSL share keyboard, while only the XP machine has internet access), and there may be leakage between the PS/2 mouse ports on this switch. But I notice online that others also had problems with Linux DSL and the mouse. As I type this I am downloading Puppy Linux--I'll let you know if it works better. But annoying in DSL is that after you get the prompt for login, it goes directly to the "Dillo" GUI, rather than a command prompt. Don't know how to turn off this behavior. Interestingly, if I unplug the mouse, it sometimes does not do this, but goes to a command prompt after login. I'll tell you one thing: DSL may be small, compact, etc, but it doesn't seem stable. Not unlike Linux in general. Hobbyware. Trust me on this folks--I code and I know what I'm talking about. The look and feel of Linux (DSL version) is cute, "almost like Windows, just like", but hobbyware nonetheless. Any suggestions appreciated...but by the time I read any replies here I'll probably already have installed Puppy Linux. BTW sometimes, if I cold reboot (since with no mouse it's very difficult to exit gracefully from the Dillo GUI, though a couple of times I somehow managed it), I get messages like "fsck failed: please repair manually and reboot... #mount -n -o remount, rww/ " etc. Like Fdisk in windows or something...implies a corrupt hard disk...but might be Linux's tendency to "mount" and "unmount" hard drives and all drives--a needless exercise IMO. Like I say, the system was a few years ago working fine with Windows 2000. Unless you assume that a PC sitting dormant for a couple of years will randomly develop errors in the hard drive (which I suppose with atmospheric radiation is always possible), then the hardware is not that much to blame (other than the on again / off again CD-ROM, as I said). RL
From: RayLopez99 on 3 Jun 2010 18:20 On Jun 3, 10:52 pm, RayLopez99 <raylope...(a)gmail.com> wrote: Just tried to run Puppy Linux...latest distro...it also failed to recognize the optical mouse. It might be because the mouse runs off the video card port, via this A/B switch. I'll get a USB mouse instead and see if that helps... So far Linux is not impressing me with the installation process...but that's part of the "fun" ain't it? Linux is installation-ware... Are we having "fun" yet? RL
From: Mike Easter on 3 Jun 2010 18:39 c.o.l.s only RayLopez99 wrote: > I have an old Pentium II (1996 or so) with a tiny amount of RAM (about > 26 MB!I think it says on bootup). Wait a minute. I want a full and accurate report on the hardware seen by the BIOS, or if the bios doesn't give you enough information about something, use some kind of dos tool on a boot cd like hwinfo or whatever. There's a hwinfo on Hiren's, along with a lot of other system id tools to choose from. -- Mike Easter
From: RayLopez99 on 3 Jun 2010 19:44 On Jun 4, 1:39 am, Mike Easter <Mi...(a)ster.invalid> wrote: > c.o.l.s only > > There's a hwinfo on Hiren's, along with a lot of other system id tools > to choose from. > Trouble is, as of the moment my mouse is not being recognized (like I said I'll get a USB mouse tomm). Now I'm in man pages for Puppy Linux (running off the CD only--DSL is still on the HD), command prompt only, but I cannot get out of the command prompt. So I type whatever and it just keeps scrolling... very frustrating. I did type Help and it gave me a list of commands but how do you break out? I tried ESC, Control-X, etc the usual Window keyboard escapes and nothing. Linux is...frustration-ware. Signing off...until tomm. RL
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia on 3 Jun 2010 20:25
On Jun 3, 7:44 pm, RayLopez99 <raylope...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 4, 1:39 am, Mike Easter <Mi...(a)ster.invalid> wrote: > > > c.o.l.s only > > > There's a hwinfo on Hiren's, along with a lot of other system id tools > > to choose from. > > Trouble is, as of the moment my mouse is not being recognized (like I > said I'll get a USB mouse tomm). Now I'm in man pages for Puppy Linux > (running off the CD only--DSL is still on the HD), command prompt > only, but I cannot get out of the command prompt. So I type whatever > and it just keeps scrolling... very frustrating. I did type Help and > it gave me a list of commands but how do you break out? I tried ESC, > Control-X, etc the usual Window keyboard escapes and nothing. > > Linux is...frustration-ware. > > Signing off...until tomm. This isn't "Linux". This is trying to run modern software, even stripped modern software, on antique and obscure hardware. Laptops, in particular, have always been flakey about proprietary drivers and unusual chipsets designed to save a few pennies, a watt of power there, or a square inch of board space somewhere else. I've helped design and build enough server and mini-system hardware to have some handle on the issues. If the manufacturer didn't provide drivers, it's unreasonable to ask another vendor or a user support community, unpaid and unthanked, to make it work for you. For the amount of time you've just burned, you can invest in a very modestly priced, far more powerful system capable of running the OS of your choice. In fact, you could even experiement and try a micro- system if you need small operating systems for expertise. But chipsets 15 years old? *Laptop* chipsets 15 years old, when you haven't even named the model number of the laptop? That's unfair to expect of any OS. Go ahead. Try and install a contemporary Windows OS on it, without the manufacturer's installation media and drivers. I'll bet that at least two components won't work. |