From: Anonymous on
"Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn't.
Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured,
outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks."

Didn't Bottoms recommend this once because it was the only distro he was
able to get his wireless working with? I think this was after he
recommended Sabayon. Of course, I could be mistaken. :o)

From: za kAT on
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 20:59:42 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote:

> "Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn't.
> Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured,
> outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks."
>
> Didn't Bottoms recommend this once because it was the only distro he was
> able to get his wireless working with? I think this was after he
> recommended Sabayon. Of course, I could be mistaken. :o)

No you are correct. There is even a pic of Bottoms on the home page.

http://www.damnvulnerablelinux.org/

--
zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416.
Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: Mark Warner on
Anonymous wrote:
> "Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn't.
> Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured,
> outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks."
>
> Didn't Bottoms recommend this once because it was the only distro he was
> able to get his wireless working with? I think this was after he
> recommended Sabayon. Of course, I could be mistaken. :o)

I doubt he did. It's not nearly as pretty as Sabayon.

--
Mark Warner
MEPIS Linux
Registered Linux User #415318
....lose .inhibitions when replying
From: B℮ar Bottoms on
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:17:40 -0400, Mark Warner wrote:

> Anonymous wrote:
>> "Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn't.
>> Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured,
>> outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks."
>>
>> Didn't Bottoms recommend this once because it was the only distro he was
>> able to get his wireless working with? I think this was after he
>> recommended Sabayon. Of course, I could be mistaken. :o)
>
> I doubt he did. It's not nearly as pretty as Sabayon.

A luzer's distro, such as it is, has but 250,000 downloads, and needs no
consideration. Such as this is much less than my postings to Usenet.

--
B℮ar Bottoms
Proud p0wner of Googleware
From: Franklin Stubbings on
Anonymous scribbled this in much secrecy:

>"Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything ...its developers have spent
>hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured, outdated, and exploitable
>software..."

That's the whole purpose of Linux, it's not a real op/sys.
It's only intended for one-up wannabes who have too much time on their
hands to spend searching for drivers et al to get it 'sort of working',
not for people with productive work to do. If you don't understand that,
then you're playing with the wrong thing.


Franklin Stubbings
"You have been targeted for denigration"