From: Anonymous on 4 Jul 2010 16:59 "Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn't. Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured, outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks." Didn't Bottoms recommend this once because it was the only distro he was able to get his wireless working with? I think this was after he recommended Sabayon. Of course, I could be mistaken. :o)
From: za kAT on 4 Jul 2010 16:59 On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 20:59:42 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote: > "Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn't. > Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured, > outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks." > > Didn't Bottoms recommend this once because it was the only distro he was > able to get his wireless working with? I think this was after he > recommended Sabayon. Of course, I could be mistaken. :o) No you are correct. There is even a pic of Bottoms on the home page. http://www.damnvulnerablelinux.org/ -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: Mark Warner on 4 Jul 2010 17:17 Anonymous wrote: > "Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn't. > Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured, > outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks." > > Didn't Bottoms recommend this once because it was the only distro he was > able to get his wireless working with? I think this was after he > recommended Sabayon. Of course, I could be mistaken. :o) I doubt he did. It's not nearly as pretty as Sabayon. -- Mark Warner MEPIS Linux Registered Linux User #415318 ....lose .inhibitions when replying
From: B℮ar Bottoms on 4 Jul 2010 18:36 On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:17:40 -0400, Mark Warner wrote: > Anonymous wrote: >> "Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn't. >> Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured, >> outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks." >> >> Didn't Bottoms recommend this once because it was the only distro he was >> able to get his wireless working with? I think this was after he >> recommended Sabayon. Of course, I could be mistaken. :o) > > I doubt he did. It's not nearly as pretty as Sabayon. A luzer's distro, such as it is, has but 250,000 downloads, and needs no consideration. Such as this is much less than my postings to Usenet. -- B℮ar Bottoms Proud p0wner of Googleware
From: Franklin Stubbings on 4 Jul 2010 20:08 Anonymous scribbled this in much secrecy: >"Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything ...its developers have spent >hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured, outdated, and exploitable >software..." That's the whole purpose of Linux, it's not a real op/sys. It's only intended for one-up wannabes who have too much time on their hands to spend searching for drivers et al to get it 'sort of working', not for people with productive work to do. If you don't understand that, then you're playing with the wrong thing. Franklin Stubbings "You have been targeted for denigration"
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: [REQ] .mkv to DVD Next: Naked proof that PC Magazine's editor is a Microsoftwhore. |