David Kaye
in [Windows Viruses]
|
Prev: Ping: David Kaye
Next: Trojan.Fraudpack
From: Andy Medina on 18 Apr 2010 17:43 "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:uvBO1dz3KHA.5084(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > "~BD~" <BoaterDaveNoSpam(a)Hotmail.co.uk> babbled in message > news:hqf0ou$84t$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > >> I am an IDIOT! >> >> Nowhere do I see an answer to my question:- >> >> Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite >> reference. >> >> If it really is as good as it sounds, perhaps Microsoft will but >> it! >> (They bought Giant - remember?!!) > > Will a mention on an official webpage suffice? > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-7/en-us/Details.aspx?type=Software&p=Malwarebytes'%20Anti-malware&v=Malwarebytes&uid=1&pf=0&pi=0&c=Communication%20%26%20Internet&sc=Security&os=32-bit Actually the question is idiotic, but that's to be expected from the ~bd~ IDIOT. Why does MS have to approve it? And what's the deal with changing a thread's subject line ~bd~ IDIOT? Not to mention the idiotic editing of the post you replied to, which I sort of undid to reflect the true aim of the original, which stated that ~bd~ is an IDIOT. Now it is truthful.
From: Andy Medina on 18 Apr 2010 19:13 "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:uvBO1dz3KHA.5084(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > "~BD~" <BoaterDaveNoSpam(a)Hotmail.co.uk> babbled in message > news:hqf0ou$84t$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > >> Nowhere do I see an answer to my question:- >> >> Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite >> reference. > > Will a mention on an official webpage suffice? > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-7/en-us/Details.aspx?type=Software&p=Malwarebytes'%20Anti-malware&v=Malwarebytes&uid=1&pf=0&pi=0&c=Communication%20%26%20Internet&sc=Security&os=32-bit BTW turn it around: ~bd~, show us a reference of software that MS has "approved".
From: "FromTheRafters" erratic on 18 Apr 2010 19:16 "Andy Medina" <gmedina(a)email.arizona.edu> wrote in message news:uewY7A03KHA.4816(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message > news:uvBO1dz3KHA.5084(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > >> "~BD~" <BoaterDaveNoSpam(a)Hotmail.co.uk> babbled in message >> news:hqf0ou$84t$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >>> I am an IDIOT! >>> >>> Nowhere do I see an answer to my question:- >>> >>> Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite >>> reference. >>> >>> If it really is as good as it sounds, perhaps Microsoft will but it! >>> (They bought Giant - remember?!!) >> >> Will a mention on an official webpage suffice? >> >> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-7/en-us/Details.aspx?type=Software&p=Malwarebytes'%20Anti-malware&v=Malwarebytes&uid=1&pf=0&pi=0&c=Communication%20%26%20Internet&sc=Security&os=32-bit > > Actually the question is idiotic, but that's to be expected > from the ~bd~ IDIOT. Why does MS have to approve it? They don't have to, but it would lend credibility toward its trustworthiness if they mentioned it. You *won't* find "Remove-it" mentioned in the same light on a Microsoft webpage. BoaterDave plays the "average user" advocate role -and wants to find a reason to believe PCButts' software is not to be trusted while Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware is. Since both "programs" are aware of each other and act on that awareness in a feud-like manner, it may confuse "average user". (the evidence he's already been shown *should* have been enough - but BD is BD after all) [...]
From: ~BD~ on 25 Apr 2010 02:30 FromTheRafters wrote: >> They don't have to, but it would lend credibility toward its >> trustworthiness if they mentioned it. You *won't* find "Remove-it" >> mentioned in the same light on a Microsoft webpage. BoaterDave plays >> the "average user" advocate role -and wants to find a reason to >> believe PCButts' software is not to be trusted while Malwarebytes' >> Anti-Malware is. Since both "programs" are aware of each other and >> act on that awareness in a feud-like manner, it may confuse "average >> user". >> >> (the evidence he's already been shown *should* have been enough - >> but BD is BD after all) BD appreciates all the help and guidance given by FTR - and thanks him! :) Banning me from The Malwarebytes forums - an organisation which has no physical address nor contact *telephone* number - is not helpful in persuading the average user that Malwarebytes *is* bonio fido. However, a link with Sunbelt Software *is* welcomed. I've tried the new facility on this laptop and am pleased to report that no malware was discovered! -- Dave
From: Peter Foldes on 25 Apr 2010 06:30
Tell me David. What was the purpose of this post of yours. Your whole post is looking very strongly as Trolling -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "~BD~" <BoaterDave.always(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:ONynKDE5KHA.3184(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > BD appreciates all the help and guidance given by FTR - and thanks him! > :) > > Banning me from The Malwarebytes forums - an organisation which has no > physical address nor contact *telephone* number - is not helpful in > persuading the average user that Malwarebytes *is* bonio fido. > > However, a link with Sunbelt Software *is* welcomed. I've tried the new > facility on this laptop and am pleased to report that no malware was > discovered! > > -- > Dave > > |