David Kaye
in [Windows Viruses]
|
Prev: Ping: David Kaye
Next: Trojan.Fraudpack
From: Andy Medina on 17 Apr 2010 05:45 "Anne Onime" <anonymous(a)rip.ax.lt> wrote in message news:b4d9bbb40022ef09aea24751d6edb834(a)rip.ax.lt... > > "~BD~" <BoaterDaveNoSpam(a)Hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:hqbpth$4k2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> David H. Lipman wrote: >>>> >>>> They weren't Easter bunnies. It was soft p.o.r.n. It was >>>> inappropriate for the Malkwarebyte forums and the religious >>>> Christians were offended. >> >> What rubbish! >> >> Most certainly there was no reason for banning me from the >> Malwarebytes >> forums, that's for sure. >> >> There's something that doesn't quite ring true about an >> organisation >> which does not correspond in a civilised manner with the users of >> its >> product. >> >> Maybe someone like David Kaye has the experience to determine if a >> machine is actually *clean* after installing and running MBAM. >> Someone, >> surely, has carried out an independent check to give such a widely >> used >> facility a clean bill of health. Whilst MBAM is obviously highly >> effective at removing 'malware' why is it considered impossible for >> the >> downloaded software to leave its *own* gremlin within the cleaned >> machine? >> >> Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite >> reference. >> >> Dave - seeking only the truth! > > IDIOT! +1
From: Peter Foldes on 17 Apr 2010 14:15 {Crossposting removed} You friggin idiot and Troll , Why did you have the need to crosspost this in the middle of the thread and for what reason. You are unfriggin believable -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "~BD~" <BoaterDaveNoSpam(a)Hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:hqbpth$4k2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > David H. Lipman wrote: >>> >>> They weren't Easter bunnies. It was soft p.o.r.n. It was >>> inappropriate for the Malkwarebyte forums and the religious >>> Christians were offended. > > What rubbish! > > Most certainly there was no reason for banning me from the Malwarebytes > forums, that's for sure. > > There's something that doesn't quite ring true about an organisation > which does not correspond in a civilised manner with the users of its > product. > > Maybe someone like David Kaye has the experience to determine if a > machine is actually *clean* after installing and running MBAM. Someone, > surely, has carried out an independent check to give such a widely used > facility a clean bill of health. Whilst MBAM is obviously highly > effective at removing 'malware' why is it considered impossible for the > downloaded software to leave its *own* gremlin within the cleaned > machine? > > Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite > reference. > > -- > Dave - seeking only the truth! > >
From: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries on 17 Apr 2010 14:47 ~BD~ wrote: > David H. Lipman wrote: >>> >>> They weren't Easter bunnies. It was soft p.o.r.n. It was >>> inappropriate for the Malkwarebyte forums and the religious >>> Christians were offended. > > What rubbish! > > Most certainly there was no reason for banning me from the > Malwarebytes forums, that's for sure. > > There's something that doesn't quite ring true about an > organisation which does not correspond in a civilised manner with > the users of its product. > > Maybe someone like David Kaye has the experience to determine if a > machine is actually *clean* after installing and running MBAM. > Someone, surely, has carried out an independent check to give > such a widely used facility a clean bill of health. Whilst MBAM > is obviously highly effective at removing 'malware' why is it > considered impossible for the downloaded software to leave its > *own* gremlin within the cleaned machine? > > Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite > reference. Malwarebytes is approved by Microsoft at least to the extent that if you open a support ticket and your problem is malware, it is one of the programs (the first program, I think) the techs will recommend to clean the infection. Your sociopathic behavior causes you to be shunned by anyone with even half a brain, over and over again. I'm amazed that you are unable to learn from experience. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey
From: ~BD~ on 18 Apr 2010 09:17 Anne Onime wrote: > I am an IDIOT! ** Nowhere do I see an answer to my question:- Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite reference. If it really is as good as it sounds, perhaps Microsoft will but it! (They bought Giant - remember?!!) -- Dave
From: "FromTheRafters" erratic on 18 Apr 2010 16:40
"~BD~" <BoaterDaveNoSpam(a)Hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:hqf0ou$84t$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Anne Onime wrote: >> I am an IDIOT! > > > ** > > Nowhere do I see an answer to my question:- > > Is Malwarebytes approved by Microsoft itself? If so, please cite > reference. > > If it really is as good as it sounds, perhaps Microsoft will but it! > (They bought Giant - remember?!!) Will a mention on an official webpage suffice? http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-7/en-us/Details.aspx?type=Software&p=Malwarebytes'%20Anti-malware&v=Malwarebytes&uid=1&pf=0&pi=0&c=Communication%20%26%20Internet&sc=Security&os=32-bit |