From: guskz on
On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > De Walls,
>
> You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone
> understand them.
>
> >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London
>
> [snipped rest of nonsense]

Look up the word de waals then dipole, then go back to school little
girl.

From: guskz on
On Jun 26, 6:19 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > De Walls,
>
> > You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone
> > understand them.
>
> > >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London
>
> > [snipped rest of nonsense]
>
> Look up the word de waals then dipole, then go back to school little
> girl.

and it's der waals.
From: guskz on
On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > De Walls,
>
> You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone
> understand them.
>
> >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London
>
> [snipped rest of nonsense]


Look up the word der waals & dipole, then go back to school little
girl.
From: guskz on
On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > De Walls,
>
> You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone
> understand them.
>
> >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London
>
> [snipped rest of nonsense]

I think magnum is looking for u.
From: Robert Higgins on
On Jun 26, 6:19 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 1:36 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 25, 3:04 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > De Walls,
>
> > You can't even spell "van der Waals" interactions, let alone
> > understand them.
>
> > >and London are forces from dipole moments of charge. London
>
> > [snipped rest of nonsense]
>
> Look up the word de waals then dipole, then go back to school little
> girl.

I'm not a girl - not like you would know what to do with one, anyway.
"Van der Waals" forces are named for a physicist,; it's not "de
Walls", or "de waals". God, you're stupid.