Prev: attachment manipulations
Next: A couple of problems
From: Charles Marcus on 2 Sep 2009 14:04 On 9/2/2009, Remy Lambert (RLambert(a)healthforcepartners.com) wrote: > Regarding the error counts, I see what you're getting at - when > taking into consideration how often a message can be retried over any > given span of time, it makes error count pretty irrelevant. I > suppose if I want the message to bounce after x number of failures, I > should just compute the average time it would take to produce that > condition and shorten "maximal_queue_lifetime" to that number. Did you miss this: Postfix can also be configured to send mail when there is a delay: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_warning_time I set mine to 15 minutes (15m) - that way a user will know that their message was not delivered when they sent it, and can follow it up with a phone call if it is important... EMail is reliable enough these days that we rarely ever get a delay warning... -- Best regards, Charles
From: Victor Duchovni on 2 Sep 2009 14:20 On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:04:12PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 9/2/2009, Remy Lambert (RLambert(a)healthforcepartners.com) wrote: > > Regarding the error counts, I see what you're getting at - when > > taking into consideration how often a message can be retried over any > > given span of time, it makes error count pretty irrelevant. I > > suppose if I want the message to bounce after x number of failures, I > > should just compute the average time it would take to produce that > > condition and shorten "maximal_queue_lifetime" to that number. > > Did you miss this: > > Postfix can also be configured to send mail when there is a delay: > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_warning_time > > I set mine to 15 minutes (15m) - that way a user will know that their > message was not delivered when they sent it, and can follow it up with a > phone call if it is important... A bit too soon, given typical grey-listing minimum retry timers. I would not send delay notices sooner than an hour after a message has been queued. FWIW, I use a 2 hour delay warning. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majordomo(a)postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
From: Charles Marcus on 2 Sep 2009 15:17 On 9/2/2009, Victor Duchovni (Victor.Duchovni(a)morganstanley.com) wrote: > A bit too soon, given typical grey-listing minimum retry timers. I > would not send delay notices sooner than an hour after a message has > been queued. FWIW, I use a 2 hour delay warning. Hmmm... I just realized why we haven't had any problems. We relay all outbound mail through our outsourced anti-spam provider (Webroot SaaS). So, unless *their* system is down - which it pretty much never is - our mail is accepted immediately. I've commented my config so if I ever fire webroot, I'll be sure to change it to 2 hours... Thanks Victor... -- Best regards, Charles
From: LuKreme on 2 Sep 2009 15:58 On 2-Sep-2009, at 11:09, Remy Lambert wrote: > I come from the land of MS Exchange so, although I'm competent I'm not sure one is allowed to use "MS Exchange" and "competent" in the same sentence without a negation. Only half kidding :) -- A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
From: Remy Lambert on 2 Sep 2009 16:09
I did indeed miss that part, thanks! Actually, now that I've looked we don't have that configured. I find that = quite odd. I didn't set this system up, but they guy who did I have high r= espect for and I'm a little amazed that he didn't configure it. I'll do so immediately - thanks again for pointing this out! -Rem -----Original Message----- From: Charles Marcus [mailto:CMarcus(a)Media-Brokers.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:04 AM To: Remy Lambert Cc: 'Postfix users' Subject: Re: Deferred queue settings? On 9/2/2009, Remy Lambert (RLambert(a)healthforcepartners.com) wrote: > Regarding the error counts, I see what you're getting at - when > taking into consideration how often a message can be retried over any > given span of time, it makes error count pretty irrelevant. I > suppose if I want the message to bounce after x number of failures, I > should just compute the average time it would take to produce that > condition and shorten "maximal_queue_lifetime" to that number. Did you miss this: Postfix can also be configured to send mail when there is a delay: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_warning_time I set mine to 15 minutes (15m) - that way a user will know that their message was not delivered when they sent it, and can follow it up with a phone call if it is important... EMail is reliable enough these days that we rarely ever get a delay warning... --=20 Best regards, Charles |