From: Fred Marshall on 5 Aug 2010 14:28 Ico wrote: > A potential customer requested a feasibiltiy study for a product > requiring detecion of dog barks in a real-time recorderd digital audio > signal. Functional requirements describe: > > "Barks should be detected with a accuracy of at least 80%, while other > (possibly loud) signals like traffic, playing children, etc should > generate false positives in no more then 10% of the cases." > > Any tips on algorithms or literature to get me started ? > > Thanks, > > Ico > If you did a "fair" job of detection, accepting more false alerts in trade for fewer false rests. I'm assuming that you're going to be wanting to detect multiple-bark sequences more than single barks. saved audio segments that are "likely", then edit out the false alerted segments manually (and, perhaps eventually automatically), You'd have a short(er) audio record of all the dog barks. I figure that the false alerts would have *some* noticeable difference that might be automated once you have the "rough" data. And, I'm assuming that the composite / compressed audio record doesn't have to be generated in real time. The problem is likely tougher if it has to run in real time. Rick's shock machine would have to run in real time to be effective I should think. Even Pavlov would say so, I'm sure. I would have mentioned the off-the-shelf products but I'll bet they operate on amplitude more than anything - so have to have high SNR and, thus, close proximity. Fred
From: Clay on 5 Aug 2010 15:14 On Aug 5, 1:26 pm, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...(a)ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: > Clay <c...(a)claysturner.com> wrote: > > (snip) > > > Simple, get your own dog and attach a sound detector with a high > > detection threshold to your dog. When your dog hears the distant dog's > > barks, your dog will act as a bark repeater/amplifier and set off your > > detector which will be rarely falsed because of the high threshold of > > detection. > > I bionic bark detector! > > -- glen The problem I'm still trying to figure out is why dogs don't bark themselves deaf? I've asked veternarians this, and the ones I've asked don't know. I wonder if the dog's ear canals pinch close during barking? Clay
From: Eric Jacobsen on 5 Aug 2010 16:33 On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:14:09 -0700 (PDT), Clay <clay(a)claysturner.com> wrote: >On Aug 5, 1:26=A0pm, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...(a)ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: >> Clay <c...(a)claysturner.com> wrote: >> >> (snip) >> >> > Simple, get your own dog and attach a sound detector with a high >> > detection threshold to your dog. When your dog hears the distant dog's >> > barks, your dog will act as a bark repeater/amplifier and set off your >> > detector which will be rarely falsed because of the high threshold of >> > detection. >> >> I bionic bark detector! >> >> -- glen > >The problem I'm still trying to figure out is why dogs don't bark >themselves deaf? I've asked veternarians this, and the ones I've asked >don't know. I wonder if the dog's ear canals pinch close during >barking? > >Clay Adaptive noise cancelling/line enhancing. Or something like that. I don't think a bark is loud enough to do any physical damage. Eric Jacobsen Minister of Algorithms Abineau Communications http://www.abineau.com
From: Ico on 5 Aug 2010 16:46 Eric Jacobsen <eric.jacobsen(a)ieee.org> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:14:09 -0700 (PDT), Clay <clay(a)claysturner.com> > wrote: > >>The problem I'm still trying to figure out is why dogs don't bark >>themselves deaf? I've asked veternarians this, and the ones I've asked >>don't know. I wonder if the dog's ear canals pinch close during >>barking? > > Adaptive noise cancelling/line enhancing. Or something like that. I > don't think a bark is loud enough to do any physical damage. I'm sure my neighbours dog is loud enough, because *I* am about to make the physical damage happen here!
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Kenlighten - A social network for knowledge seekers and providers Next: Used Car Sri Lanka |