Did Michelson Morley prove Newton correct?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Problem shows absolute space, not relative space is needed.
Next: Did Michelson Morley prove Newton correct?
From: HVAC on 11 Jun 2010 08:39 "Painius" <starswirlernosp(a)maol.com> wrote in message news:4c11fb0c$0$15235$9a6e19ea(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... >> >>> What do *you* know about it? >> >> You know, I'm really into getting a good laugh, once in a while. Why >> don't >> you go over to sci.phyics.relativity and create a post with the subject >> line: Uncle Al, I believe in aether. > > All Uncle Al does anymore is call people "idiots" and > whatever. Why would anybody want to subject > themselves to his brand of "brutal" mainstream > dogma leg lifting? That dogma won't hunt. Uncle Al sounds like my kind of guy. I think I'll check it out. Thanks, MIB ! > > MIB, this is not your great-grandfather's aether, which > was static and unmoving. This is a dynamic, highly > pressurized medium that flows into stars to contain > their tremendous, outwardly mobile fusion pressure > (otherwise they would have us believe that a star for > some ungodly reason generates *BOTH* forces). And > a medium that flows into planets to keep your feet on > the ground. > > Now, what do you know about that? What do *you* > think space is comprised of, MIB? > > happy days and... > starry starry nights! > > -- > Indelibly yours, > Paine Ellsworth > > P.S. "In my experience, there is only one motivation, > and that is desire. No reasons or principle > contain it or stand against it." > > Jane Smiley > Pulitzer Prize-winning American novelist > > P.P.S.: http://www.painellsworth.net > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth > > |