From: Notan on 17 Jun 2010 00:47 On 6/16/2010 3:53 PM, Bob Wang wrote: > Are you saying that for 18 months you were downloading and accepting > fraudulent charges into Quicken, and didn't notice? There's probably some type of statute-of-limitations clause, within a credit card company's contract, that states the holder has a limited period in which to submit a fraud claim. This one is laughable.
From: Margaret on 17 Jun 2010 12:05 Notan wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:53 PM, Bob Wang wrote: >> Are you saying that for 18 months you were downloading and accepting >> fraudulent charges into Quicken, and didn't notice? > > There's probably some type of statute-of-limitations clause, > within a credit card company's contract, that states the holder > has a limited period in which to submit a fraud claim. > > This one is laughable. > I would say so! What's the point of downloading charges if you never look at them? This is one reason I don't let Quicken automatically enter charges. I'd most likely notice a balance off, but I'll definitely notice it when I review and accept those charges. Regards, Margaret -- http://twokatmew.smugmug.com
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Verizon - VZ - no quote Next: How to fix a confusing Mutual fund situation |