Do disk defraggers check file systems first?
in [Storage]
|
From: Joep on 14 Oct 2009 03:49 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> schreef in bericht news:7jhcubF3577d8U1(a)mid.individual.net... > >>> Easy to claim. You cant actually substantiate that claim. > >> No actually it isn't, just try it for yourself. > > Did that, you lied. You didn't Rodless > > And it makes no sense to be doing a full reboot every day anyway. > > If you do want to turn the system off every day, you should hibernate, not > shut down. I shut it down. > >
From: Joep on 14 Oct 2009 03:58 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> schreef in bericht news:7jhdikF35bug4U1(a)mid.individual.net... > Joep wrote >> Ato_Zee <ato_zee(a)hotmail.com> wrote >>> Joep <available(a)request.nl> wrote > >>>>>>> Fragmentation wasn't an issue in the days of CP/M and isn't today. > >>>>>> It still is an issue > >>>>> Easy to claim. You cant actually substantiate that claim. > >>>> No actually it isn't, just try it for yourself. > >>> I have, defragging makes no discernable difference. > >> I do not make money with it. I am not talking defragging, I am talking >> optimizing for quite a few posts now. > > You're lying now. Oh? > >> If you didn't get that by now, you're thick. > > And you are a pathological liar. Hahaha. Yes, I AM LYING! > >> It does make a noticable difference (file placement, optimization). > > Like hell it does. And modern MS OSs do that anyway. > >> Right here, on both PCs I use. > > Doesnt make the HUGE DIFFERENCE you lied about previously. Well, actually it is huge. > > Even with the worst file placement, the most that does is add > a couple of milliseconds to the head movement between files > and that is nothing in the total boot time of a curent MS OS. Try it and you will find you're wrong. You can continue repeating yourself, but that doesn't change this fact that can be easily verified by anyone. > >> What you have to say for the rest, I don't care. If you defrag or not, I >> don't care.Iif anyone else defrags or not, I don't care. I am not in a >> server environment, I don't care if they run it on servers or not. > >> Waiting for the thing to boot bugs me. > > Then you should hibernate instead of shutting down, stupid. He's calling names and we all know what that means > > Pity you're so stupid that you havent even noticed that hibernating saves > a hell of a lot MORE in the startup time than file placement ever does. Well, personal dislike, I only use it for laptop during lunchbreak, short brakes. > >> To accomplish that I do not need to defrag 'all the time' as you put it. >> Just once every 3 months is fine depending on software installed >> (including service packs) during that period. > > Service packs dont come out at anything like that frequency and > software installed doesnt affect the placement of OS files either. Yeah, I meant the regular updates, sorry. No, software installed doesn't affect OC boot, but if those are programs I frequently use, I want them optimized as well. > >> All apps I frequently use load faster after disk optimization. > > At most by a few mS. Thats nothing in app start time, liar. Well, it actually does Rod. Loading an app does may require Windows more than just loading the app. > >> Instead of the previous disk rattling and waiting, the disk is now quiet >> and the app is up in no time. > > Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you are a pathological > liar. > >> For me that's a significant improvement. > > Pity that hibernating instead of shutting down would save MUCH more. What does hibernate do for app loading then? > >> I am happy now. > > Village eejuts usually are. Even if so, that doesn't proof a thing.
From: Rod Speed on 13 Oct 2009 05:22 Joep wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>>>>> Fragmentation wasn't an issue in the days of CP/M and isn't today. >>>>> It still is an issue >>>> Easy to claim. You cant actually substantiate that claim. >>> No actually it isn't, just try it for yourself. >> Did that, you lied. > You didn't Rodless You're lying, as always. >> And it makes no sense to be doing a full reboot every day anyway. >> If you do want to turn the system off every day, you should hibernate, not shut down. > I shut it down. Then you are a terminal fuckwit when hibernating saves a hell of a lot more time on the startup than 'optimising' can ever do.
From: Rod Speed on 5 Nov 2009 04:24
John Turco wrote > Rod Speed wrote >>> Joep wrote >>>> If you do want to turn the system off every day, you should >>>> hibernate, not shut down. >>> I shut it down. >> Then you are a terminal fuckwit when hibernating saves a hell >> of a lot more time on the startup than 'optimising' can ever do. > Hey, Rod, do you think "Joep" knows what ever happened to his > fellow denizen of the Netherlands...the foulest of fanatics, > Folkert Rienstra? Dat ol' Folksy ain't been around here, at > all, throughout 2009. He's the one that killed him off, because Fucknert made snide remarks about his commercial activity. > In fact, according to Google Groups </http://groups.google.com>, > the dreadful Dutchman's final Usenet post was on September 19, > 2008; no longer does he plague >any< newsgroup, evidently. Yeah, the GFC saw the plug pulled on net access to his padded cell. Heard the one about silver linings ? > Oh, and for your information, I'm hardly wailing about his sudden disappearance. I know you grovel in front of your Fucknert shrine, daily. > (Good riddance to bad rubbish, as the saying goes.) Indeed. |