Prev: Electrochemistry cut off experiments and absurdity of modern science?.
Next: Defining Observation.
From: Zerkon on 12 Apr 2010 09:07
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:09:30 -0700, Dennis Markuze wrote:

> THE REAL QUESTION:
>
> DOES ATHEISM HAVE A FUTURE?
>
> AND THE ANSWER - NO!

On this NG the question is: is there such a thing as a future that can
then be 'had'. Also, since you immediately answer your own question, it
is either not a "real question" or a real answer. The exclamation mark
possibly a clue here.

Also your subject is an -ism defined by the simple negation of yet
another -ism. Since you demand "GET OUT OF MY UNIVERSE" it seems apparent
you claim sole ownership of the universe therefore you are attacking
A*DennisMarkuze*ISM or those who do not believe that you are the god/
theos.

I, for one, welcome the revelation of finally knowing who owns this
universe and so bears total legal responsible for it. My very smart
brother-in-law and two mildly bright first cousins are lawyers
specializing in civil and criminal law. I strongly suggest you begin
preparing for your own future.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Electrochemistry cut off experiments and absurdity of modern science?.
Next: Defining Observation.