From: dorayme on
In article <hi4v5i92i43(a)news5.newsguy.com>, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol>
wrote:

> Patricia Aldoraz wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 9:38 am, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Methinks PD is a mathematician in which axiomatic certainty can occur.
> >
> > Axioms do not reside in mathematicians, they reside in systems.
>
> Oh, good grief. You don't even have high school math in your
> background.
>

You are becoming quite a specialist at cowardly one line responses to
posts by me and others, is this to hide the great analytical skills you
boasted about recently? Do you ever have really good reasons for your
views?

--
dorayme
From: dorayme on
In article
<762f63fb-184d-4547-9a88-c13b015e9a1c(a)k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 6, 11:52 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 9:38 am, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Methinks PD is a mathematician in which axiomatic certainty can occur.
> >
> > Axioms do not reside in mathematicians, they reside in systems.
>
> What do you mean by a "system"? You mean like an algebraic system or
> in a car engine?

Oh, you are actually coming back to do more than abuse me personally!
What happened? Did you have a religious experience?

The matter is quite trivial and it was a light remark of mine in
response to a stupid looking (perhaps grammatically stupid) sentence
from Stafford. When philosophers talk about axioms it is generally to
indicate statements that have a special status, often ones that generate
a system or tree of consequences, the statements themselves not being a
consequence of anything else in the system. It just seemed odd to me to
think that axioms were somehow in mathematicians themselves.

Anyway, I also probably made a mistake here - you see I am only just in
training in fathoming the convolutions of the scrambled egg brains I am
seeing on this usenet group and long experience of this insulting fool,
Stafford makes me jump to conclusions incautiously. I notice he does use
the word certainty, and that I suppose does *reside* in mathematicians.
But this is way too subtle a mistake for you to have realised before
abusing me in your last post.

--
dorayme
From: J. Clarke on
dorayme wrote:
> In article <hi4v5i92i43(a)news5.newsguy.com>, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol>
> wrote:
>
>> Patricia Aldoraz wrote:
>>> On Jan 6, 9:38 am, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Methinks PD is a mathematician in which axiomatic certainty can
>>>> occur.
>>>
>>> Axioms do not reside in mathematicians, they reside in systems.
>>
>> Oh, good grief. You don't even have high school math in your
>> background.
>>
>
> You are becoming quite a specialist at cowardly one line responses to
> posts by me and others, is this to hide the great analytical skills
> you boasted about recently? Do you ever have really good reasons for
> your views?

Would you be kind enough to define the words "axiom" and "axiomatic" as you
are using them?

From: PD on
On Jan 7, 1:54 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>
> Anyway, I also probably made a mistake here - you see I am only just in
> training in fathoming the convolutions of the scrambled egg brains I am
> seeing on this usenet group and long experience of this insulting fool,
> Stafford makes me jump to conclusions incautiously.

Aaaaand the Hypocrisy Meter lights up into the red...
From: John Stafford on
In article
<40ff7a5d-d930-46b7-9516-dff2874d8637(a)j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 7, 1:54�pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> >
> > Anyway, I also probably made a mistake here - you see I am only just in
> > training in fathoming the convolutions of the scrambled egg brains I am
> > seeing on this usenet group and long experience of this insulting fool,
> > Stafford makes me jump to conclusions incautiously.
>
> Aaaaand the Hypocrisy Meter lights up into the red...

And I "made her jump...". Hey, if I could make her do anything it would
be to have her check into an asylum for an overhaul.