Does the crop work?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Dudley Hanks on 3 May 2010 20:31 http://www.nothingnotpossible.com/cgi-bin/NotPossible/UnderConstruction Take Care, Dudley
From: Vance on 4 May 2010 05:26 On May 3, 5:31 pm, "Dudley Hanks" <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > http://www.nothingnotpossible.com/cgi-bin/NotPossible/UnderConstruction > > Take Care, > Dudley Not really, at least to my eye. It's not the cropping down of the sky area, but something else that makes it a little ungainly. Perhaps, keeping the sky reducing crop, crop in from image left a bit. Just by eye, maybe 3/4 of the length in along the lighter striped fabric of the harness. That would put the emphasis properly on MIch by making him a larger part of the composition in terms of visual mass (his size and color as a percentage of the total image) and still leave the car as an important element. Just a suggestion. Regards, Vance
From: LOL! on 4 May 2010 05:31 On Tue, 4 May 2010 02:26:09 -0700 (PDT), Vance <vance.lear(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On May 3, 5:31�pm, "Dudley Hanks" <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: >> http://www.nothingnotpossible.com/cgi-bin/NotPossible/UnderConstruction >> >> Take Care, >> Dudley > >Not really, at least to my eye. It's not the cropping down of the sky >area, but something else that makes it a little ungainly. Perhaps, >keeping the sky reducing crop, crop in from image left a bit. Just by >eye, maybe 3/4 of the length in along the lighter striped fabric of >the harness. That would put the emphasis properly on MIch by making >him a larger part of the composition in terms of visual mass (his size >and color as a percentage of the total image) and still leave the car >as an important element. > >Just a suggestion. > >Regards, >Vance Oooo, look everybody! Dudley conned another human into being his seeing-eye doggy for him! For FREE! Unless of course Vance got trained and was fed treats for this. LOL! Sit up and beg "Vance!" What a GOOD doggy you are! <pat> <pat> <pat> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: LOL! on 4 May 2010 05:51 On Tue, 4 May 2010 02:26:09 -0700 (PDT), Vance <vance.lear(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On May 3, 5:31�pm, "Dudley Hanks" <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: >> http://www.nothingnotpossible.com/cgi-bin/NotPossible/UnderConstruction >> >> Take Care, >> Dudley > >Not really, at least to my eye. It's not the cropping down of the sky >area, but something else that makes it a little ungainly. Perhaps, >keeping the sky reducing crop, crop in from image left a bit. Just by >eye, maybe 3/4 of the length in along the lighter striped fabric of >the harness. That would put the emphasis properly on MIch by making >him a larger part of the composition in terms of visual mass (his size >and color as a percentage of the total image) and still leave the car >as an important element. > >Just a suggestion. > >Regards, >Vance Oooo, look everybody! Dudley conned another human into being his seeing-eye doggy for him! For FREE! Unless of course Vance got trained and was fed treats for this. LOL! Sit up and beg "Vance!" What a GOOD doggy you are! <pat> <pat> <pat> Now, for the real challenge "Vance", can you roll over and play dead? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: Tim Conway on 4 May 2010 06:32
"LOL!" <lol(a)lol.org> wrote in message news:kfrvt5lvel2i4jmpvlf9gjm4n5i9n243de(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 4 May 2010 02:26:09 -0700 (PDT), Vance <vance.lear(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>On May 3, 5:31 pm, "Dudley Hanks" <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: >>> http://www.nothingnotpossible.com/cgi-bin/NotPossible/UnderConstruction >>> >>> Take Care, >>> Dudley >> >>Not really, at least to my eye. It's not the cropping down of the sky >>area, but something else that makes it a little ungainly. Perhaps, >>keeping the sky reducing crop, crop in from image left a bit. Just by >>eye, maybe 3/4 of the length in along the lighter striped fabric of >>the harness. That would put the emphasis properly on MIch by making >>him a larger part of the composition in terms of visual mass (his size >>and color as a percentage of the total image) and still leave the car >>as an important element. >> >>Just a suggestion. >> >>Regards, >>Vance > > > Oooo, look everybody! > > Dudley conned another human into being his seeing-eye doggy for him! > > For FREE! > > Unless of course Vance got trained and was fed treats for this. > > LOL! > > Sit up and beg "Vance!" > > What a GOOD doggy you are! > > <pat> <pat> <pat> > > Now, for the real challenge "Vance", can you roll over and play dead? > > LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! how about you?! |