From: RichA on 3 May 2010 18:45 Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. All you do is allow your competition to take (and keep) market share. If the market has shrunk from 100 to 80 (arbitrary numbers) do think being LESS visible is going to help your company?? You are now fighting over a smaller pie, so get the F--- in there and produce something.
From: Overseer on 3 May 2010 19:22 "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:5e868267-67b8-46dd-b7ff-c70e6aefdaaa(a)q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes > about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. All > you do is allow your competition to take (and keep) market share. If > the market has shrunk from 100 to 80 (arbitrary numbers) do think > being LESS visible is going to help your company?? You are now > fighting over a smaller pie, so get the F--- in there and produce > something. > WOW, you must vote NDP (Canada's Socialists) too. Their plan is to spend their way out of a deficit.
From: Ray Fischer on 4 May 2010 02:38 RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes >about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. Given that you're a stupid racist bigot I'd hardly think that you're in the slightest bit qualified to make decisions about multinational corporations' strategies. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Ray Fischer on 4 May 2010 02:39 Overseer <anonymous(a)not-for-mail.invalid> wrote: > >"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >news:5e868267-67b8-46dd-b7ff-c70e6aefdaaa(a)q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >> Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes >> about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. All >> you do is allow your competition to take (and keep) market share. If >> the market has shrunk from 100 to 80 (arbitrary numbers) do think >> being LESS visible is going to help your company?? You are now >> fighting over a smaller pie, so get the F--- in there and produce >> something. >> >WOW, you must vote NDP (Canada's Socialists) too. Their plan is to spend >their way out of a deficit. In the US that's the plan of the GOP. As I recall it was Reagan who first pushed the idea. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: David J Taylor on 4 May 2010 02:43
"RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:5e868267-67b8-46dd-b7ff-c70e6aefdaaa(a)q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > Dear camera makers; reducing releases of cameras in a recession makes > about as much sense as cutting back advertising to save money. All > you do is allow your competition to take (and keep) market share. If > the market has shrunk from 100 to 80 (arbitrary numbers) do think > being LESS visible is going to help your company?? You are now > fighting over a smaller pie, so get the F--- in there and produce > something. I rather suspect that purchasers are pleased that their existing cameras are not being made obsolete as often. Value for money will be even more important than before, not reworks of a 10MP camera into an11MP one. David |