Prev: debian [testing/etch] redirected broadcasts not working
Next: Install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 problem
From: Greg Folkert on 18 Feb 2007 22:50 On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 22:43 -0500, Ken Heard wrote: > Is there anyone on this list who uses dosemu? I had it working on Sarge > ever since Sarge came out, but I am having trouble getting it to work on > Etch. Exactly how did you install it? -- greg(a)gregfolkert.net Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup
From: Ron Johnson on 18 Feb 2007 23:00 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/18/07 21:43, Ken Heard wrote: > Is there anyone on this list who uses dosemu? I had it working on Sarge > ever since Sarge came out, but I am having trouble getting it to work on > Etch. This is an example of a Bad Question. All we know is "dosemu" and "Sarge". No error messages or what you've done to solve it yourself or research it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF2R+WS9HxQb37XmcRAu2cAKDE5fKBtUIr4afoqqS1f1+3sAo1PQCfZ9EO zqJ1BS8TbZhcb3i4+ekj5ak= =yTKZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
From: Miquel van Smoorenburg on 19 Feb 2007 05:40 In article <45D91CEB.4050006(a)heard.name>, Ken Heard <ken(a)heard.name> wrote: >Is there anyone on this list who uses dosemu? I had it working on Sarge >ever since Sarge came out, but I am having trouble getting it to work on >Etch. If your PC is fast enough, why not use dosbox instead. It uses cpu-emulation instead of vm86 mode, so it's a bit slower, but it's a lot easier to get going (dos is built in, and it can access the linux file system). Mike. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
From: Stephen Chadfield on 19 Feb 2007 07:20 Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels(a)cistron.nl> wrote: > In article <45D91CEB.4050006(a)heard.name>, > Ken Heard <ken(a)heard.name> wrote: >>Is there anyone on this list who uses dosemu? I had it working on Sarge >>ever since Sarge came out, but I am having trouble getting it to work on >>Etch. > > If your PC is fast enough, why not use dosbox instead. > > It uses cpu-emulation instead of vm86 mode, so it's a bit slower, > but it's a lot easier to get going (dos is built in, and it can > access the linux file system). Dosbox is great. I have been using it to play Microprose F1GP2 - vroom! -- Stephen Chadfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
From: Roberto C. Sanchez on 19 Feb 2007 10:10 On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:18:42AM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > If your PC is fast enough, why not use dosbox instead. > > It uses cpu-emulation instead of vm86 mode, so it's a bit slower, > but it's a lot easier to get going (dos is built in, and it can > access the linux file system). > In that case, qemu with the kqemu accelerator might be a good choice as well. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: debian [testing/etch] redirected broadcasts not working Next: Install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 problem |