Prev: apt-get's update and upgrade don't tell me about newer Kernels?
Next: out of disk space error installing fedora: linux allowcddma not ?helpful
From: Bit Twister on 24 Apr 2010 08:29 On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:14:41 -0700, Artist wrote: > I am using the dovecot.conf my control panel (http://froxlor.org) > instructed to use. I see nothing listening on port 110, emails sent to > my server bounce, and email client connection attempts are refused. I > have been looking for something wrong in dovecot.conf For me, I setup dovecot to use imap protocols, where to dump errors/info logs, declared the mail location, and group for dovecot access. Ports in use are # netstat -tunap | grep dove tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:993 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2307/dovecot tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:143 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2307/dovecot Here is the vendor original and my dovecot.conf file difference. # diff -bBw /etc/dovecot.conf_vorig /etc/dovecot.conf 24c24 < #protocols = imap imaps --- > protocols = imap imaps 68c68 < #log_path = --- > log_path = /var/log/dovecot/errors.log 72c72 < #info_log_path = --- > log_path = /var/log/dovecot/info.log 228c228 < #mail_location = --- > mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u 309c309 < #mail_privileged_group = --- > mail_privileged_group = mail
From: Keith Keller on 24 Apr 2010 12:48 On 2010-04-24, Artist <Artist(a)sj.speakeasy.net> wrote: > Keith Keller wrote: >> If you're configuring a new dovecot from scratch, it's probably better >> to start with the example dovecot-example.conf and modify it as needed. > > I am using the dovecot.conf my control panel (http://froxlor.org) > instructed to use. Please read my above again. Trust me, get the original example file and modify that. Not only are you starting from a known configuration (that others know), but you know exactly what modifications are being made. > I see nothing listening on port 110, emails sent to > my server bounce, and email client connection attempts are refused. I > have been looking for something wrong in dovecot.conf You need access to your logs to know for sure, but it sounds like dovecot isn't starting up (which probably means your control panel hosed the config). The log should tell you why it might not be starting; this is also better than randomly looking through the config file trying to find errors, since the log will tell you exactly what's wrong. --keith -- kkeller-usenet(a)wombat.san-francisco.ca.us (try just my userid to email me) AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt see X- headers for PGP signature information
From: Artist on 24 Apr 2010 18:55 Keith Keller wrote: > On 2010-04-24, Artist <Artist(a)sj.speakeasy.net> wrote: >> Keith Keller wrote: >>> If you're configuring a new dovecot from scratch, it's probably better >>> to start with the example dovecot-example.conf and modify it as needed. >> I am using the dovecot.conf my control panel (http://froxlor.org) >> instructed to use. > > Please read my above again. Trust me, get the original example file and > modify that. Not only are you starting from a known configuration (that > others know), but you know exactly what modifications are being made. > >> I see nothing listening on port 110, emails sent to >> my server bounce, and email client connection attempts are refused. I >> have been looking for something wrong in dovecot.conf > > You need access to your logs to know for sure, but it sounds like > dovecot isn't starting up (which probably means your control panel hosed > the config). The log should tell you why it might not be starting; this > is also better than randomly looking through the config file trying to > find errors, since the log will tell you exactly what's wrong. > > --keith > Dovecot had started up. But I have dovecot listening now and connections to the server using the email client are no longer being refused. I had been using the command "/etc/init.d/dovecot reload" expecting this would cause dovecot to reload "dovecot.conf." The command "dovecot -n" seemed to verify it reloaded "dovecot.conf." But the ports at 110 and 143 were still not open. To get them open I had to kill dovecot and restart it. It did not work to do this with "/etc/init.d/dovecot restart." In response I got the error that dovecot was already running, which means the function "do_stop()" in the script "/etc/init.d/dovecot" did not work. This was true even with the correction described at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516845 where the extra "/" character is removed. (This correction did work for awhile. But no longer for an unknown reason.) To kill and restart dovecot to get the most recent "dovecot.conf" file acted on I had to do the command sequence: pkill dovecot /etc/init.d/dovecot start My problem now is dovecot is not accepting the password I enter in the email client. -- If you desire to respond directly remove the "sj." from the domain name part of my email address. It is a spam jammer.
From: Keith Keller on 24 Apr 2010 19:41 On 2010-04-24, Artist <Artist(a)sj.speakeasy.net> wrote: > > My problem now is dovecot is not accepting the password I enter in the > email client. CHECK YOUR LOGS!!!!!!!! Nobody can give you much useful help without these. (And dovecot is usually good at logging authentication issues.) --keith -- kkeller-usenet(a)wombat.san-francisco.ca.us (try just my userid to email me) AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt see X- headers for PGP signature information
From: Artist on 24 Apr 2010 20:54
Keith Keller wrote: > On 2010-04-24, Artist <Artist(a)sj.speakeasy.net> wrote: >> My problem now is dovecot is not accepting the password I enter in the >> email client. > > CHECK YOUR LOGS!!!!!!!! Nobody can give you much useful help without > these. (And dovecot is usually good at logging authentication issues.) > > --keith > I have, and I have been trying to figure out why there is no connection to the database: dovecot: Apr 24 18:32:01 Error: auth-worker(default): sql(Webmaster,0.0.0.0): Password query failed: Not connected to database (real IP number removed) -- If you desire to respond directly remove the "sj." from the domain name part of my email address. It is a spam jammer. |