Prev: Suggestions for digital camera which has 1920x1080 video
Next: eat more meat
From: Ray Fischer on 27 Nov 2009 01:17
RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 26, 6:59�am, Mike <mikere...(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 26, 6:01�am, RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Robert Coe wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:48:20 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > : On Nov 25, 12:33 am, nospam <nos...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> > > : > In article <YrOdnUkGWe8JJpHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdn...(a)giganews.com>, Rich
>> > > : >
>> > > : > <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
>> > > : > > The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but silence
>> > > : > > speaks volumes. They guy is right about some of the more prolific
>> > > : > > posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive because
>> > > : > > of the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.
>> > > : >
>> > > : > the fact that you are reposting that garbage here suggests that it is
>> > > : > *you* who signed up as 'hercules' and posted it in just about every
>> > > : > forum.
>> > > :
>> > > : Hardly. �I just applaud the guy for attacking the thin-skinned, fanboy
>> > > : children in those forums.
>>
>> > > By what convoluted logic does that puerile rant qualify as an "attack"? It
>> > > lacks any substantive examples of the incompetence and fraud it seems to
>> > > allege. At best it's a diatribe; at worst it's gibberish.
>>
>> > > Bob
>>
>> > The idea was to broad-brush certain members of forums without naming
>> > them all and starting 100 brush fires in the process. �Fact is, the
>> > guy makes good points and it all boils down to one cause: �That too
>> > many hotheads are TOO emotionally involved with their particular
>> > equipment. �They need to be reminded that a camera is a tool or a toy
>> > and NOT a lover.
>>
>> Ha ha ha ha ha. You utter hypocrite.
>> Canon this.
>> Plastic that.
>>
>> Physician heal thyself
>
>Difference is, I'm not defending the indefensible, making up
>attributes for products to minimize faults.

LOL!

Yes, you are. It's all you do.

> In other words, unlike
>them, I have no blind faith in any system

Except the one you use.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: John McWilliams on 27 Nov 2009 14:05
Ray Fischer wrote:
> RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Yes, you are. It's all you do.
>
>> In other words, unlike
>> them, I have no blind faith in any system
>
> Except the one you use.
>

Don't feed the trolls, hypocrite.
From: Bob Larter on 29 Nov 2009 00:16
Rich wrote:
> This follows on the heels of that Youtube entry about Dpreview and pixel
> peeping.
>
> The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but silence
> speaks volumes. They guy is right about some of the more prolific
> posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive because of
> the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=33793997

Um, you do realise that post is almost certainly from our pet P&S troll?

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up. on 29 Nov 2009 04:37
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:16:23 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Rich wrote:
>> This follows on the heels of that Youtube entry about Dpreview and pixel
>> peeping.
>>
>> The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but silence
>> speaks volumes. They guy is right about some of the more prolific
>> posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive because of
>> the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.
>>
>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=33793997
>
>Um, you do realise that post is almost certainly from our pet P&S troll?


Bob Larter's legal name: Lionel Lauer
Home news-group, an actual group in the "troll-tracker" hierarchy:
alt.kook.lionel-lauer (established on, or before, 2004)
Registered Description: "the 'owner of several troll domains' needs a group where he'll stay on topic."

<http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&num=10&as_ugroup=alt.kook.lionel-lauer>

"Results 1 - 10 of about 2,170 for group:alt.kook.lionel-lauer."
From: Charles on 29 Nov 2009 21:23

"Rich" <none(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:YrOdnUkGWe8JJpHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> This follows on the heels of that Youtube entry about Dpreview and pixel
> peeping.
>
> The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but silence
> speaks volumes. They guy is right about some of the more prolific
> posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive because of
> the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=33793997
>
> Below is the transcript as of 12:05am EST:
>
>
> Speaking of 4/3 NEW [SIMILAR]
> Hercules - 5 hours ago
>
> It's time that someone steps in here and tells you fanboys a thing or
> two. You guys are the most pathetic, laughable, delusional, idiotic,
> trollish, big mouthed wastes of resources this planet has ever seen.

Big Snip

Gee, I never knew that brand zealots posted there ;>)



First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Suggestions for digital camera which has 1920x1080 video
Next: eat more meat