Prev: Suggestions for digital camera which has 1920x1080 video
Next: eat more meat
From: nospam on 25 Nov 2009 00:33
In article <YrOdnUkGWe8JJpHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Rich
<none(a)nowhere.com> wrote:

> The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but silence
> speaks volumes. They guy is right about some of the more prolific
> posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive because of
> the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.

the fact that you are reposting that garbage here suggests that it is
*you* who signed up as 'hercules' and posted it in just about every
forum.
From: RichA on 25 Nov 2009 18:48
On Nov 25, 12:33 am, nospam <nos...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
> In article <YrOdnUkGWe8JJpHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdn...(a)giganews.com>, Rich
>
> <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
> > The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but silence
> > speaks volumes.  They guy is right about some of the more prolific
> > posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive because of
> > the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.
>
> the fact that you are reposting that garbage here suggests that it is
> *you* who signed up as 'hercules' and posted it in just about every
> forum.

Hardly. I just applaud the guy for attacking the thin-skinned, fanboy
children in those forums.
From: Robert Coe on 25 Nov 2009 20:05
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:48:20 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
: On Nov 25, 12:33�am, nospam <nos...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
: > In article <YrOdnUkGWe8JJpHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdn...(a)giganews.com>, Rich
: >
: > <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
: > > The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but silence
: > > speaks volumes. �They guy is right about some of the more prolific
: > > posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive because
: > > of the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.
: >
: > the fact that you are reposting that garbage here suggests that it is
: > *you* who signed up as 'hercules' and posted it in just about every
: > forum.
:
: Hardly. I just applaud the guy for attacking the thin-skinned, fanboy
: children in those forums.

By what convoluted logic does that puerile rant qualify as an "attack"? It
lacks any substantive examples of the incompetence and fraud it seems to
allege. At best it's a diatribe; at worst it's gibberish.

Bob
From: RichA on 26 Nov 2009 01:01


Robert Coe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:48:20 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> : On Nov 25, 12:33�am, nospam <nos...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:
> : > In article <YrOdnUkGWe8JJpHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdn...(a)giganews.com>, Rich
> : >
> : > <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
> : > > The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but silence
> : > > speaks volumes. �They guy is right about some of the more prolific
> : > > posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive because
> : > > of the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.
> : >
> : > the fact that you are reposting that garbage here suggests that it is
> : > *you* who signed up as 'hercules' and posted it in just about every
> : > forum.
> :
> : Hardly. I just applaud the guy for attacking the thin-skinned, fanboy
> : children in those forums.
>
> By what convoluted logic does that puerile rant qualify as an "attack"? It
> lacks any substantive examples of the incompetence and fraud it seems to
> allege. At best it's a diatribe; at worst it's gibberish.
>
> Bob

The idea was to broad-brush certain members of forums without naming
them all and starting 100 brush fires in the process. Fact is, the
guy makes good points and it all boils down to one cause: That too
many hotheads are TOO emotionally involved with their particular
equipment. They need to be reminded that a camera is a tool or a toy
and NOT a lover.
From: Bruce on 26 Nov 2009 01:49
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:01:29 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>The idea was to broad-brush certain members of forums without naming
>them all and starting 100 brush fires in the process. Fact is, the
>guy makes good points and it all boils down to one cause: That too
>many hotheads are TOO emotionally involved with their particular
>equipment. They need to be reminded that a camera is a tool or a toy
>and NOT a lover.


Yes, it is almost as bad as an irrational hatred of "plastic".

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Suggestions for digital camera which has 1920x1080 video
Next: eat more meat