From: kangax on 4 Dec 2009 16:33 ES5 is now officially approved as an ECMA standard � https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2009-December/010215.html -- kangax
From: Dmitry A. Soshnikov on 5 Dec 2009 06:31 On Dec 5, 12:33 am, kangax <kan...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > ES5 is now officially approved as an ECMA standard https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2009-December/010215.html > > -- > kangax That's good. Thanks for info ;)
From: Hans-Georg Michna on 5 Dec 2009 06:40 On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:33:39 -0500, kangax wrote: >ES5 is now officially approved as an ECMA standard — >https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2009-December/010215.html So what do you all like and dislike in ECMAScript 5? Hans-Georg
From: Dr J R Stockton on 5 Dec 2009 16:14 In comp.lang.javascript message <lYudnUBpqZiuHYTWnZ2dnUVZ_v5i4p2d(a)gigane ws.com>, Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:33:39, kangax <kangax(a)gmail.com> posted: >ES5 is now officially approved as an ECMA standard — https://mail.mozil >la.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2009-December/010215.html I see that ecmascript.org is still offering a final version which is not the latest final version. Has anyone found a URL for the actual non-draft version? As things stand, I cannot assume that the latest final draft version that I've seen is the last final draft. H'mmm ... Google -> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm -> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA- 262.pdf The latter seems /echt/. -- (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Grandson-Of-RFC1036 is published. RFC 5536 Netnews Article Format is a subset of Internet Message Format which is described in RFC 5532. The two RFCs are read together to determine standard Netnews article format.
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 5 Dec 2009 23:42
Dr J R Stockton wrote: > kangax posted: >> ES5 is now officially approved as an ECMA standard — https://mail.mozil >> la.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2009-December/010215.html > > I see that ecmascript.org is still offering a final version which is not > the latest final version. > > Has anyone found a URL for the actual non-draft version? > As things stand, I cannot assume that the latest final > draft version that I've seen is the last final draft. > > H'mmm ... Google -> > http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm > -> > http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA- > 262.pdf > > The latter seems /echt/. And yet the title of that latter PDF document confusingly is only "Final final final final draft Standard ECMA-262 5th edition", at least in my viewer (Okular). I wonder, is this just a publishing glitch of some sort or will the final revision be published later (as it was with ES3, published at ecma-international.org in December 1999, but the revision named "final", being available at Mozilla.org, dated March 24, 2000)? PointedEars -- var bugRiddenCrashPronePieceOfJunk = ( navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE 5') != -1 && navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mac') != -1 ) // Plone, register_function.js:16 |