Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Relativity]
|
From: ajay on 4 Oct 2009 19:41 On Oct 4, 9:47 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Oct 4, 8:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > (i) The main paper is at > > >http://merlin.fic.uni.lodz.pl/concepts/2006_4/2006_4_351.pdf > > And the rebuttal is in the same journal: > > http://www.conceptsofphysics.net/V_3/549.pdf > > You never answered the question: why do you try to push the SAME paper > all over the internet? ------- (i) See the same journals CONCEPTS OF PHYSICS Vol. V No. 3 (2008) pp. 553-558 Link http://www.wbabin.net/ajay/sharma13.pdf Title Ajay Sharma re-justifies his paper on Generalization of Einstein's E=mc2 after pointing out elementary mistake in Andrew George's paper (ii) A person ANDREW GEORGE, who gave his false identity ( that he is at University of Denver Physics Dept, Denver, Colorado, 80208 , USA) wrote a contradictory article and sent to Editor. Editor welcomed the same as different opinion and asked me to clarify. I did the same. So my reply is also published side by side. I AGAIN ADD ANDREW GEORGE has committed elementary mistakes. You can read. (iii) I invite you to contradict my work. When you will read , try to write , you will understand the papers. And you will appreciate. Let me again add, Einstein's Sep. 1905 is true under SPECIAL CONDITIONS only not under GENERAL CONDITIONS. It is justified in paper. It is being extended. Hence I critically analyzed the same. Is it sin to question Einstein? (iv) Reason for posting on internet. Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics. I REQUESTED number of times and asked him to re-consider the decision. But he did not. He is misusing the resources of PHYSICAL REVIEW A, AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, New York. I have my highest regards for Physical Review A and American Physical Society. So I am pointing out the facts on the internet for wider audience. (v) Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: pra(a)aps.org, 001-631-591-4000, Should explain why he did 8th class math wrong. AJAY SHARMA
From: ajay on 4 Oct 2009 19:42 On Oct 4, 9:47 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Oct 4, 8:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > (i) The main paper is at > > >http://merlin.fic.uni.lodz.pl/concepts/2006_4/2006_4_351.pdf > > And the rebuttal is in the same journal: > > http://www.conceptsofphysics.net/V_3/549.pdf > > You never answered the question: why do you try to push the SAME paper > all over the internet? (i) See the same journals CONCEPTS OF PHYSICS Vol. V No. 3 (2008) pp. 553-558 Link http://www.wbabin.net/ajay/sharma13.pdf Title Ajay Sharma re-justifies his paper on Generalization of Einstein's E=mc2 after pointing out elementary mistake in Andrew George's paper (ii) A person ANDREW GEORGE, who gave his false identity ( that he is at University of Denver Physics Dept, Denver, Colorado, 80208 , USA) wrote a contradictory article and sent to Editor. Editor welcomed the same as different opinion and asked me to clarify. I did the same. So my reply is also published side by side. I AGAIN ADD ANDREW GEORGE has committed elementary mistakes. You can read. (iii) I invite you to contradict my work. When you will read , try to write , you will understand the papers. And you will appreciate. Let me again add, Einstein's Sep. 1905 is true under SPECIAL CONDITIONS only not under GENERAL CONDITIONS. It is justified in paper. It is being extended. Hence I critically analyzed the same. Is it sin to question Einstein? (iv) Reason for posting on internet. Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics. I REQUESTED number of times and asked him to re-consider the decision. But he did not. He is misusing the resources of PHYSICAL REVIEW A, AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, New York. I have my highest regards for Physical Review A, American Physical Society. So I am pointing out the facts on the internet for wider audience. (v) Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: pra(a)aps.org, 001-631-591-4000, Should explain why he did 8th class math wrong. AJAY SHARMA
From: Dono. on 4 Oct 2009 21:05 On Oct 4, 4:41 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 4, 9:47 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > On Oct 4, 8:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > (i) The main paper is at > > > >http://merlin.fic.uni.lodz.pl/concepts/2006_4/2006_4_351.pdf > > > And the rebuttal is in the same journal: > > >http://www.conceptsofphysics.net/V_3/549.pdf > > > You never answered the question: why do you try to push the SAME paper > > all over the internet? > > ------- > > (i) See the same journals CONCEPTS OF PHYSICS Vol. V No. 3 (2008) pp. > 553-558 > The rebuttal is correct, this is why it was published. > > Title Ajay Sharma re-justifies his paper on Generalization of > Einstein's E=mc2 > after pointing out elementary mistake in Andrew George's paper > The errors are all yours. > wrote a contradictory article and sent to Editor. Editor welcomed the > same as different opinion and asked me to clarify. I did the same. So > my reply is also published side by side. > You just repeated the same errors. > Hence I critically analyzed the same. Is it sin to question > Einstein? > No, it is not a sin but in your case it is an idiocy. > (iv) Reason for posting on internet. > Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG > subtraction of 8th Class mathematics. > I REQUESTED number of times and asked him to re-consider the decision. And he refused since : 1. You are trying to publish the SAME paper over and over again. 2. Your paper has been proven wrong already.
From: ajay on 4 Oct 2009 22:20 On Oct 5, 6:05 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Oct 4, 4:41 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 4, 9:47 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > On Oct 4, 8:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > (i) The main paper is at > > > > >http://merlin.fic.uni.lodz.pl/concepts/2006_4/2006_4_351.pdf > > > > And the rebuttal is in the same journal: > > > >http://www.conceptsofphysics.net/V_3/549.pdf > > > > You never answered the question: why do you try to push the SAME paper > > > all over the internet? > > > ------- > > > (i) See the same journals CONCEPTS OF PHYSICS Vol. V No. 3 (2008) pp.. > > 553-558 > > The rebuttal is correct, this is why it was published. > > > > > Title Ajay Sharma re-justifies his paper on Generalization of > > Einstein's E=mc2 > > after pointing out elementary mistake in Andrew George's paper > > The errors are all yours. > > > wrote a contradictory article and sent to Editor. Editor welcomed the > > same as different opinion and asked me to clarify. I did the same. So > > my reply is also published side by side. > > You just repeated the same errors. > > > Hence I critically analyzed the same. Is it sin to question > > Einstein? > > No, it is not a sin but in your case it is an idiocy. > > > (iv) Reason for posting on internet. > > Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG > > subtraction of 8th Class mathematics. > > I REQUESTED number of times and asked him to re-consider the decision. > > And he refused since : > > 1. You are trying to publish the SAME paper over and over again. > 2. Your paper has been proven wrong already.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ----------- (i) I have proved in 6 page rebuttal that there are elementary mistakes in George's article. It is title of article itself. See the same journal CONCEPTS OF PHYSICS Vol. V No. 3 (2008) pp. 553-558 Link http://www.wbabin.net/ajay/sharma13.pdf Title Ajay Sharma re-justifies his paper on Generalization of Einstein's E=mc2 after pointing out elementary mistake in Andrew George's paper My explanation is correct, was accepted after George's remarks and published. Just read it. Andrew George who gave false identity in the paper (that he is at University of Denver Physics Dept, Denver, Colorado, 80208 , USA) does not even know how to interpret an equation for final results. Chairman of Physics Dept University of DENVER said he has been never member of Dept of Physics. Such liars can not be believed. (ii) How many times I am to tell you GO TO JOURNALS AND PROVE I AM WRONG, if you have little sense. I have proved in broad day light, in number of journals improving my papers. Do you think all Editors are wrong? Every Editor is right, and you are wrong. (iii) Reason for posting on internet. Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics. I REQUESTED number of times and asked him to re-consider the decision. But he did not. He is misusing the resources of PHYSICAL REVIEW A, AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, New York. I have my highest regards for Physical Review A, American Physical Society. So I am pointing out the facts on the internet for wider audience. (vi) Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: pra(a)aps.org, 001-631-591-4000, Should explain why he did 8th class math wrong. (v) Dr Drake is not coming up as he knows he is wrong and cannot defend himself. He has made many more mistakes in manipulated reports. On July 11, 2008 he has asked me to accept everything and dont discuss it anywhere. It implies he knows his mistakes. Why he is silent after committing mistakes? AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Dono. on 5 Oct 2009 00:11
On Oct 4, 7:20 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > ----------- > (i) I have proved in 6 page rebuttal that there are elementary > mistakes in George's article. No, your error is quite evident, as pointed by Georges, you don't know the conservation of momentum. > My explanation is correct, was accepted after George's remarks and > published. Just read it. I read it, you repeat the same mistakes. You don't know conservation of momentum. Elementary. |