Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Logic]
|
Prev: New essay on Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem
Next: Solutions manual to Entrepreneurship 1e Bygrave Zacharakis
From: doug on 23 Oct 2009 11:04 ajay wrote: > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > >>ajay wrote: >> >> -------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>To >> >>>Inertial >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >>> frequency f '' >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted text - >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > --------- > To > Doug > > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here which is at zero. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: ajay on 23 Oct 2009 19:41 On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > ajay wrote: > > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > >>ajay wrote: > > >> -------- > > >>>To > > >>>Inertial > > >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse > > >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > >>> frequency f '' > > >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. > >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. > > >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant > >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand > >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted text - > > >>- Show quoted text - > > > --------- > > To > > Doug > > > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. > You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here > which is at zero. > > > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ------------- To Doug Under what conditions energy is conseved? Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Inertial on 23 Oct 2009 20:13 "ajay" <ajayonline.us(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> ajay wrote: >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> >> >>ajay wrote: >> >> >> -------- >> >> >>>To >> >> >>>Inertial >> >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse >> >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >> >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >> >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >> >>> frequency f '' >> >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. >> >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. >> >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us >> >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant >> >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted >> >>text - >> >> >>- Show quoted text - >> >> > --------- >> > To >> > Doug >> >> > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. >> >> No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. >> You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here >> which is at zero. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > ------------- > To > Doug > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be. Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.
From: ajay on 24 Oct 2009 09:07 On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > >> ajay wrote: > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > >> >> -------- > > >> >>>To > > >> >>>Inertial > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > >> >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > >> >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > >> >>> frequency f '' > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant > >> >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted > >> >>text - > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > >> > --------- > >> > To > >> > Doug > > >> > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. > >> You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here > >> which is at zero. > > >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > ------------- > > To > > Doug > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A > is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be.. > Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -------------- To Doug Give specific reply so that we may proceed further Under what conditions energy is conseved? Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: tomy tomy on 24 Oct 2009 19:28
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > >> ajay wrote: > > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > > >> >> -------- > > > >> >>>To > > > >> >>>Inertial > > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse > > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > > >> >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > > >> >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > > >> >>> frequency f '' > > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. > > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. > > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant > > >> >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand > > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted > > >> >>text - > > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > >> > --------- > > >> > To > > >> > Doug > > > >> > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. > > >> You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here > > >> which is at zero. > > > >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > ------------- > > > To > > > Doug > > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > > You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A > > is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be. > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > -------------- > > To > Doug > > Give specific reply so that we may proceed further > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - interesting |