Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Logic]
|
Prev: New essay on Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem
Next: Solutions manual to Entrepreneurship 1e Bygrave Zacharakis
From: ajay on 3 Oct 2009 20:03 Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics. It is done to save Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of E =mc2 Dr Drake is REQUESTED to justify himself as he is associated with world's most famous American Physical Society. Email of Dr Gordon W.F. Drake: pra(a)aps.org, 001-631-591-4000, Email of Ajay Sharma ajay.sharmaa(a)rediffmail.com, 0091 94184 50899 Website www.AjayOnLine.us Part I Ajay Sharma has sent paper to Editor Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake 17 March 2008 manuscript no. DQ10345A. The title of the paper Experimental and theoretical feasibilities of conversion factor other than c2 in mass energy inter-conversion equation by Ajay Sharma Wrong subtraction of 8th class mathematics in letter dated 19 June 2008 by Dr Gordon W.F. Drake In letter dated 19 June 2008, wrote equations and then doing wrong subtraction of 8th standard level. In my paper I have justified that Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of E =mc2, also gives E 'proportional to' mc2 or E =Ac2m i.e. E =mc2 is generalized as E =Ac2m Dr Gordon W.F. Drakes perception of cyclic process in Email dated 19 June 2008 1. A hydrogen atom of mass M in its ground state absorbs a photon of frequency f and makes a transition to the first excited state. 2. The hydrogen atom of mass M* in its excited state is then converted entirely into the energy of a high-frequency photon of frequency f*. Then hf* = M*c^2 = Mc^2 + hf/A. hf* = Mc2 + hf/A. (1) 3. The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of frequency f. hf* =Mc2 + hf (2) Subtraction by Editor Gordon W.F.Drake of eq.(1) and eq.(2) hf* = Mc2 + hf/A hf* =Mc2 + hf --------------------------- Difference = hf/A â hf = hf (1/A-1) (3) and interpreted it. WRONG, 8th class subtraction by Editor Dr W.F. Drake. Dr Drake has forgotten the basic definition of equation that it has LHS and RHS. Further basic rule which is taught to 8th class student is while subtraction is that LHS of one equation is subtracted from LHS from second equation. RHS of one equation is subtracted from the second equation. Mistake of Dr Drake: Dr Drake did not subtract LHS of eq.(1) from LHS of eq.(2), which is absolutely wrong. Correct version is hf* = Mc2 + hf/A hf* = Mc2 + hf --------------------------- 0 = hf/A â hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1 (4) LHS is subtracted from LHS, (hf* - hf* = 0) and RHS is subtracted from RHS (hf/A â hf). As the Left Hand Sides of both the equations are equal, hence the difference is zero. Thus Dr Drake applied 8th class mathematics incorrectly. Part II What was Drakes' motive behind remarks? Ajay Sharma in paper manuscript DQ10345A Experimental and theoretical feasibilities of conversion factor other than c2 in mass energy inter-conversion equation has generalized E = mc2 to E =Ac2m on the basis concrete theoretical and experimental evidences. Now Editor Dr Gordon W.F. Drake, wanted to prove this generalization is wrong and he invented own mechanism for this. But in the process he proved, that he did 8th class mathematics WRONG. Thus Dr Drake is wrong, and generalization of E=mc2 to E =Ac2m is correct. The theme of Einstein's paper of Sep. 1905 of E = mc2 (i) Einstein's Sep.1905, derivation of E = mc2 also predicts that E 'proportional to' mc2. The reason for above deduction is that Einstein derived ïE=ïmc2 under SPECIAL CONDITIONS, and under GENERAL CONDITIONS the result, E 'proportional to' mc2 or E =Ac2m (5) It is justified by Ajay Sharma in manuscript DQ10345A. What is meant by Special Conditions in Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation? In Einstein's derivation of E=mc2 of Sep. 1905 there are four variables and Einstein took suitable values of variables. This derivation involves emission of light energy by luminous body. (a) Luminous body under consideration emits only TWO waves. (b) Luminous body emits two waves of EQAUL magnitudes. (c) Two waves are emitted by body in exactly opposite directions (ï¦ = 0 and ï¦ =180). (d) Einstein has taken velocity in classical region (v<<c and applied binomial theorem). Under the Special or handpicked conditions, Einstein derived L = mc2 (6) where L is light energy emitted by body. Then Einstein replaced L by E to get E = mc2 (7) What is meant by General Conditions in Einstein's derivation? The conditions other than taken by Einstein are called General conditions. For example, (A) The body emits LARGE NUMBER of light waves. (B) The waves emitted are of DIFFERENT MAGNITUDES. (C) Body emits waves at DIFFERENT ANGLES. (D) Light emitting body may be at rest. Under the General or handpicked conditions, Einstein derived (typical calculations) L = mc2/1141 = 0.000876mc2 (8) L 'proportional to' mc2 As above, E 'proportional to' mc2 or E =Ac2m. (5) Then, E =Ac2m. is applied in various cases. For further information visit www.AjayOnLine.us Email ajay.sharmaa(a)rediffmail.com, 0091 94184 50899 AJAY SHARMA 02 October 2009
From: tomy tomy on 16 Oct 2009 12:51 On Oct 16, 4:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 16, 11:08 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 10:11 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 16, 7:20 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 15, 6:42 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 15, 10:38 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 11:22 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > No, he has realized that you are a crank and are not capable > > > > > > > of being educated so there was no more need to waste time trying > > > > > > > to help you. > > > > > > > Exactly > > > > > > ------ > > > > > To > > > > > Dono > > > > > > Dr Drake knows he is wrong. > > > > > No, he know YOU are wrong. > > > > ----- > > > To > > > DONO > > > How I am wrong? Dr Drake is silent over. Why does he not defend > > > himself ? > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > He just got bored with your stupidity. Me too, bye.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > ------ > To > DONO > > Why did Drake not address the issue in letter dated 6th Oct. 2009 ? > The reason is that it is difficult for him defend. > Soon I am going to point out his limitations about > LAW OF CONSERVATION OF energy. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - interesting
From: tomy tomy on 16 Oct 2009 12:53 On Oct 16, 4:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 16, 11:08 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 10:11 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 16, 7:20 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 15, 6:42 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 15, 10:38 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 11:22 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > No, he has realized that you are a crank and are not capable > > > > > > > of being educated so there was no more need to waste time trying > > > > > > > to help you. > > > > > > > Exactly > > > > > > ------ > > > > > To > > > > > Dono > > > > > > Dr Drake knows he is wrong. > > > > > No, he know YOU are wrong. > > > > ----- > > > To > > > DONO > > > How I am wrong? Dr Drake is silent over. Why does he not defend > > > himself ? > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > He just got bored with your stupidity. Me too, bye.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > ------ > To > DONO > > Why did Drake not address the issue in letter dated 6th Oct. 2009 ? > The reason is that it is difficult for him defend. > Soon I am going to point out his limitations about > LAW OF CONSERVATION OF energy. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - interesting
From: ajay on 16 Oct 2009 20:47 On Oct 16, 9:53 pm, tomy tomy <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 16, 4:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 16, 11:08 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > On Oct 15, 10:11 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 16, 7:20 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 15, 6:42 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 10:38 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 11:22 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > No, he has realized that you are a crank and are not capable > > > > > > > > of being educated so there was no more need to waste time trying > > > > > > > > to help you. > > > > > > > > Exactly > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > To > > > > > > Dono > > > > > > > Dr Drake knows he is wrong. > > > > > > No, he know YOU are wrong. > > > > > ----- > > > > To > > > > DONO > > > > How I am wrong? Dr Drake is silent over. Why does he not defend > > > > himself ? > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > He just got bored with your stupidity. Me too, bye.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > ------ > > To > > DONO > > > Why did Drake not address the issue in letter dated 6th Oct. 2009 ? > > The reason is that it is difficult for him defend. > > Soon I am going to point out his limitations about > > LAW OF CONSERVATION OF energy. > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > interesting- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ------- AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
From: ajay on 16 Oct 2009 20:49
On Oct 16, 9:53 pm, tomy tomy <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 16, 4:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 16, 11:08 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > On Oct 15, 10:11 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 16, 7:20 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 15, 6:42 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 10:38 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 11:22 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > No, he has realized that you are a crank and are not capable > > > > > > > > of being educated so there was no more need to waste time trying > > > > > > > > to help you. > > > > > > > > Exactly > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > To > > > > > > Dono > > > > > > > Dr Drake knows he is wrong. > > > > > > No, he know YOU are wrong. > > > > > ----- > > > > To > > > > DONO > > > > How I am wrong? Dr Drake is silent over. Why does he not defend > > > > himself ? > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > He just got bored with your stupidity. Me too, bye.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > ------ > > To > > DONO > > > Why did Drake not address the issue in letter dated 6th Oct. 2009 ? > > The reason is that it is difficult for him defend. > > Soon I am going to point out his limitations about > > LAW OF CONSERVATION OF energy. > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > interesting- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ----- AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us |