From: John_H on 27 Apr 2010 18:32 On Apr 27, 8:59 am, Eric <eric.lafor...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > You mentioned earlier that you had implemented this at some point in > the past. Could you tell me more about where you heard about this > (domain, application, etc...) or did you come up with it yourself? I'm > just trying to suss out the common origin of the multiple XOR > suggestions I've received. This was original development. It started from flag management between two asynchronous domains. Then it moved to data manipulation between two async domains. Extending it to larger memories just flowed.
From: John_H on 27 Apr 2010 20:16 On Apr 27, 6:32 pm, John_H <newsgr...(a)johnhandwork.com> wrote: > > This was original development. A little clarification: Many things that are "good" but not immediately obvious have already been done. After I'd been using the technique for async transfers and talked about it on this newsgroup applied to multiport memories a couple years back, I found the technique was already used. Like the rhombic dodecahedron and triacontahedron I "invented" in high school (the Greeks beat me to it by far) those shapes and the XOR technique are unique to those who haven't been exposed to them.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: clock routing to generic IO pins? Next: Raggedstone2 Spartan-6 Board Update |