Efficient methods
in [Embedded]
|
From: karthikbalaguru on 28 Jan 2010 02:46 On Jan 26, 11:19 pm, Jim Stewart <jstew...(a)jkmicro.com> wrote: > karthikbalaguru wrote: > > Hi, > > > Need to know some efficient > > methods for reception, > > processing and transmission > > of the high speed messages. > > > Should i need to go in for > > a method of having a > > transmitter thread, queue > > and receiver thread concept ? > > > Are there alternative efficient > > methods for processing of > > High Speed Messages ? > > The most efficient way to send data > is a 747 cargo plane full of DVD ROMS.- Hide quoted text - > :-) Nice imagination :-) !! Karthik Balaguru
From: karthikbalaguru on 28 Jan 2010 03:00 On Jan 27, 12:08 am, Grant Edwards <inva...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 2010-01-26, Paul E. Bennett <Paul_E.Benn...(a)topmail.co.uk> wrote: > > > Jim Stewart wrote: > >> The most efficient way to send data > >> is a 747 cargo plane full of DVD ROMS. > > > There was a story about a data file being sent by memory stick > > (encrypted) attached to the leg of a carrier pigeon. The > > entire file made it to the receivers end by this means before > > 30% of the same data file had been transmitted over the > > internet connections. I gather that the file was some > > 4Gbytes. > > It was done in South Africa as a stunt to publicize the slow > ADSL service provided by Telkom: > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm > > The pigeon transported 4GB of data 60 miles between two > datacenters in 1 hour 8 minutes. The transfer ADSL was 4% > complete 4% in the same amount of time. > Interesting :-) :-) > Protocols requiring more interaction don't fare so well when > using a Pigeon as a physical layer: > > http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-257064.html > Good links ! :-) Karthik Balaguru
From: Tauno Voipio on 28 Jan 2010 06:15 Jim Stewart wrote: > karthikbalaguru wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Need to know some efficient >> methods for reception, >> processing and transmission >> of the high speed messages. >> >> Should i need to go in for >> a method of having a >> transmitter thread, queue >> and receiver thread concept ? >> >> Are there alternative efficient >> methods for processing of >> High Speed Messages ? > > The most efficient way to send data > is a 747 cargo plane full of DVD ROMS. A bit more: Change the DVD's to 1 TByte disks. (Just my EUR 0.02). -- Tauno Voipio
From: karthikbalaguru on 28 Jan 2010 11:30 On Jan 27, 12:08 am, Grant Edwards <inva...(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 2010-01-26, Paul E. Bennett <Paul_E.Benn...(a)topmail.co.uk> wrote: > > > Jim Stewart wrote: > >> The most efficient way to send data > >> is a 747 cargo plane full of DVD ROMS. > > > There was a story about a data file being sent by memory stick > > (encrypted) attached to the leg of a carrier pigeon. The > > entire file made it to the receivers end by this means before > > 30% of the same data file had been transmitted over the > > internet connections. I gather that the file was some > > 4Gbytes. > > It was done in South Africa as a stunt to publicize the slow > ADSL service provided by Telkom: > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8248056.stm > > The pigeon transported 4GB of data 60 miles between two > datacenters in 1 hour 8 minutes. The transfer ADSL was 4% > complete 4% in the same amount of time. > > Protocols requiring more interaction don't fare so well when > using a Pigeon as a physical layer: > > http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-257064.html > Interestingly QoS RFC is also present for it in the form of RFC 2549 ! Weighted fair queueing & plot of traffic shaping topics appear interesting :-) Karthik Balaguru
From: karthikbalaguru on 29 Jan 2010 10:35
On Jan 26, 2:11 pm, FreeRTOS info <noem...(a)given.com> wrote: > karthikbalaguru wrote: > > Hi, > > > Need to know some efficient > > methods for reception, > > processing and transmission > > of the high speed messages. > > > Should i need to go in for > > a method of having a > > transmitter thread, queue > > and receiver thread concept ? > > > Are there alternative efficient > > methods for processing of > > High Speed Messages ? > > > Thx in advans, > > Karthik Balaguru > > That would depend on a lot of things, details of which you helpfully > avoid giving in your post (like what "high speed" means, and how long > the messages are). > Many messages are around 700 bytes and few are around 1200 bytes. The speed would be around 80 Mbit/s. Thx in advans, Karthik Balaguru |