Prev: Two slit experiment
Next: PHOTONS AND CANNONBALLS IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD
From: Spirit on 31 May 2010 01:45
On May 30, 3:41 am, Spirit <truthtot...(a)prodigy.net> wrote:
> The worm in Einstein's apple is the addition of velocity. It is not
> correct for this universe of ours.
>
> An exterior at rest Observer has to hold a moving object still to
> observe a motion in that moving object, or you may conceive that the
> Observer also moves with the moving object he is observing and that
> from that viewpoint both are at rest and not moving.
>
> The moving object and the exterior at rest Observer are thus both at
> rest with regard to the motion observed in the previously conceived of
> moving object.
>
> Thus no time dilation, no length contraction, no lack of simultaneity,
> no time warps, wormholes or black holes.
>
> The basis of SR and much else is thus nullified.
>
> In a universe such as this, where there is a speed limit, velocity is
> only computable to one order of event/magnitude.
>
> Spirit
>
> Copyright Spirit of Truth May 30th, 2010

Since, apparently that is too much for you to understand, perhaps the
following will put it in perspective for you all:

Sunday, June 07, 2009 2:23 AM
>snip
Part of that truth is no time dimension exists, only the eternity
of consciousness existence. That existence translates to nowness.
Part of that truth is that all observers exist in that nowness
and it is, simply, now. Lack of simultaneity is false because it is
false.

In that consciousness existence of now the physical
universe persists in continuing, changing and evolving,
a kind of foreverness energy, constantly appearing around
the consciousness. No block universe exists. The
consciousness is cause and causes effects at the will
of the consciousness.

That nowness is also a state of complete rest. All observers
exist in actual complete rest despite appearances. So,
relativity is also true.

Since the math Einstein uses works out as he says,
something else is wrong with the proposition.
Either light is not always c in the condition that a frame
would say it would be a problem, or the math is missing
some factor which would correct the problem. I am not an
expert in physics so while I continue to try to find the
answer myself, I am waiting for some bright spark
to come up with the solution. As it is, the math, if
understood (as it is in SR), would lead people to not be able to
see the truth of nowness and the truth of the universe,
and that would be a tragedy.


Spirit


May, 30, 2010

And, since none of you came up with the correct insight, I had to do
it myself.

It is correct what I have revealed to you above so it behooves all of
you and the physics community
to go back to basics and realize it.


Spirit

Copyright Spirit of Truth May 30, 2010
From: Sue... on 31 May 2010 02:48
On May 31, 1:45 am, Spirit <truthtot...(a)prodigy.net> wrote:
> On May 30, 3:41 am, Spirit <truthtot...(a)prodigy.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The worm in Einstein's apple is the addition of velocity. It is not
> > correct for this universe of ours.
>
> > An exterior at rest Observer has to hold a moving object still to
> > observe a motion in that moving object, or you may conceive that the
> > Observer also moves with the moving object he is observing and that
> > from that viewpoint both are at rest and not moving.
>
> > The moving object and the exterior at rest Observer are thus both at
> > rest with regard to the motion observed in the previously conceived of
> > moving object.
>
> > Thus no time dilation, no length contraction, no lack of simultaneity,
> > no time warps, wormholes or black holes.
>
> > The basis of SR and much else is thus nullified.
>
> > In a universe such as this, where there is a speed limit, velocity is
> > only computable to one order of event/magnitude.
>
> > Spirit
>
> > Copyright Spirit of Truth May 30th, 2010
>
> Since, apparently that is too much for you to understand, perhaps the
> following will put it in perspective for you all:
>
> Sunday, June 07, 2009 2:23 AM>snip
>
> Part of that truth is no time dimension exists, only the eternity
> of consciousness existence. That existence translates to nowness.

That's the spirit, Spirit!

Hope you are still spry enough for military service
because the armies of the world need more people
like you that are unconcerned how much *time*
elapses as a bullet completes the final metre
approaching their breastbone.


<< Application of Noether's theorem allows physicists to
gain powerful insights into any general theory in physics,
by just analyzing the various transformations that would
make the form of the laws involved invariant. For example:

* the invariance of physical systems with respect
to spatial translation (in other words, that the laws
of physics do not vary with locations in space) gives
the law of conservation of linear momentum;
* invariance with respect to rotation gives the law
of conservation of angular momentum;
* invariance with respect to time translation gives
the well-known law of conservation of energy >>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Applications

Now go put a flag on a grave for breathing air
that mathematically challenged idiots don't really
deserve to breath.

Sue...


> Part of that truth is that all observers exist in that nowness
> and it is, simply, now. Lack of simultaneity is false because it is
> false.
>
> In that consciousness existence of now the physical
> universe persists in continuing, changing and evolving,
> a kind of foreverness energy, constantly appearing around
> the consciousness. No block universe exists. The
> consciousness is cause and causes effects at the will
> of the consciousness.
>
> That nowness is also a state of complete rest. All observers
> exist in actual complete rest despite appearances. So,
> relativity is also true.
>
> Since the math Einstein uses works out as he says,
> something else is wrong with the proposition.
> Either light is not always c in the condition that a frame
> would say it would be a problem, or the math is missing
> some factor which would correct the problem. I am not an
> expert in physics so while I continue to try to find the
> answer myself, I am waiting for some bright spark
> to come up with the solution. As it is, the math, if
> understood (as it is in SR), would lead people to not be able to
> see the truth of nowness and the truth of the universe,
> and that would be a tragedy.
>
> Spirit
>
> May, 30, 2010
>
> And, since none of you came up with the correct insight, I had to do
> it myself.
>
> It is correct what I have revealed to you above so it behooves all of
> you and the physics community
> to go back to basics and realize it.
>
> Spirit
>
> Copyright Spirit of Truth May 30, 2010

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Two slit experiment
Next: PHOTONS AND CANNONBALLS IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD