Prev: Anders, Ebihara Re: additive versus multiplicative creation: Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #179; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Long Summary (rev 2) of 'Medical Doctors: The Sickening Force Undermining World Health and also Undermining the United Nations Organizations ...' {HRI 20100304-V6.1-SL-V2}
From: mpc755 on 20 Jun 2010 15:50
On Jun 20, 3:46 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I see you are just cut and paste!
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ...
disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
aether's state of displacement.

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
The material is maether.
Maether has mass.
Aether and matter have mass.
Aether is uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether.
Aether is displaced by matter.
The aether is not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'.
The 'displacing back' is the pressure exerted by the aether.
Gravity is pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter.

A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit. The aether wave enters
and exits multiple slits. The aether wave creates interference upon
exiting the slits which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the aether
wave and there is no interference.

'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
By A. EINSTEIN'
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

"If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass
diminishes by L/c2."

The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer
exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as
aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three
dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether
and matter is energy.

Mass does not convert to energy. Matter converts to aether. As the
mæther transitions from matter to aether it increases in volume. The
physical effect the increase in volume has on the neighboring matter
and aether is energy.

The physical effect of maether decompressing is energy.

Mass is conserved.

The rate at which an atomic clock 'ticks' is based upon the aether
pressure in which it exists. In terms of motion, the speed of a GPS
satellite with respect to the aether causes it to displace more aether
and for that aether to exert more pressure on the clock in the GPS
satellite than the aether pressure associated with a clock at rest
with respect to the Earth. This causes the GPS satellite clock to
"result in a delay of about 7 ìs/day". The aether pressure associated
with the aether displaced by the Earth exerts less pressure on the GPS
satellite than a similar clock at rest on the Earth" causing the GPS
clocks to appear faster by about 45 ìs/day". The aether pressure
associated with the speed at which the GPS satellite moves with
respect to the aether and the aether pressure associated with the
aether displaced by the Earth causes "clocks on the GPS satellites
[to] tick approximately 38 ìs/day faster than clocks on the ground."
(quoted text from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_relativity_on_GPS).

'The Need to Understand Mass'
By Roger Cashmore
Department of Physics
University of Oxford, UK.
http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/courses/phy400w/particle/higgs2.htm

"There is, however, one very clever and very elegant solution to this
problem, a solution first proposed by Peter Higgs. He proposed that
the whole of space is permeated by a field, similar in some ways to
the electromagnetic field. As particles move through space they travel
through this field, and if they interact with it they acquire what
appears to be mass. This is similar to the action of viscous forces
felt by particles moving through any thick liquid. the larger the
interaction of the particles with the field, the more mass they appear
to have. Thus the existence of this field is essential in Higg's
hypothesis for the production of the mass of particles."

The "action of viscous forces felt by particles moving through any
thick liquid" is the particles interaction with the aether. The force
is the pressure exerted by the displaced aether towards the particle.
The "thick liquid" is the aether behaving as a frictionless superfluid
'one something'.

"the larger the interaction of the particles with the field, the more
mass they appear to have." The faster the particle moves with respect
to the aether, the greater the pressure exerted by the displaced
aether towards the particle.

'Politics, Solid State and the Higgs'
By David Miller
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University College, London, UK.
http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/courses/phy400w/particle/higgs3.htm

"1. The Higgs Mechanism
In three dimensions, and with the complications of relativity, this is
the Higgs mechanism. In order to give particles mass, a background
field is invented which becomes locally distorted whenever a particle
moves through it. The distortion - the clustering of the field around
the particle - generates the particle's mass. The idea comes directly
from the physics of solids. Instead of a field spread throughout all
space a solid contains a lattice of positively charged crystal atoms.
When an electron moves through the lattice the atoms are attracted to
it, causing the electron's effective mass to be as much as 40 times
bigger than the mass of a free electron."

The distortion of the background field is the displacement of the
aether by the moving particle. The 'clustering' of the field around
the particle is the 'displacing back'. The 'clustering' of the field
is the pressure exerted by the displaced aether towards the particle.

"The idea comes directly from the physics of solids." The aether
behaves as a frictionless superfluid 'one something'.

In the Casimir Effect, the aether displaced by each of the plates
extends past the other plate, forcing the plates together.
From: BURT on 20 Jun 2010 16:05
On Jun 20, 8:52 am, Sam <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2:08 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Mass is concentrated energy but there is spread out energy that does
> > not weigh and cannot be called mass.
>
>   Already wrong--but you being a troll already know that
>   what you post is only to provoke responses from other
>   posters. That's one reason I ignore your posts via my
>   kill file. Have fun troll!  Replonk!

There is unconcentrated energy in field bond of Strong and Electric
force inside the atoms. At the center of spread out energy sphere
there is mass we call point particle. It is surrounded by a pilot
wave.

Mitch Raemsch
From: zookumar yelubandi on 22 Jun 2010 10:29
mpc755 wrote:
> > On Jun 21, 12:12 pm, zookumar yelubandi <zooku...(a)yahoo.ca> wrote:
> > > Uncle Al wrote:
[...]
> > > > The physical effect of maether decompressing is energy.
> > > > Mass is conserved.
> >
> > > 1) Elugelab, October 1952, 19:15 hrs 31 GMT.
> > > 2) idiot
> >
> > Elugelab does not contradict what mpc755 is proposing. Mass is
> > conserved precisely because *both* aether and matter have mass. The
> > conversion (according to mpc755) is between matter and aether, not mass
> > and energy. If one reads the author correctly, mass is compressed and
> > decompressed, not created and destroyed. Also, energy is a physical
> > effect of this compression/decompression and is therefore either
> > absorbed or released in the process. This is akin to endothermic and
> > exothermic ... although the better words are probably endodynic and
> > exodynic.
> > To wit, Mass = Maether = (matter + aether). Mass/maether is
> > conserved.
> > Why are you making a munch of it in grasping a simple and highly
> > intuitive proposition?
> > Uncle Zook
> Thanks.

You're welcome. Of all the big brains I've ever had the
pleasure and displeasure of encounter (of the usenet kind), Brother Al
is perhaps the most useless of the lot ... and precisely because of the
narrow range of ideas he espouses. A big brain combined with a narrow
mind is an inefficient pairing. A shame, really. He could've been
something. As it is, he'll continue to argue in favor of "papered"
quasi-established science because, the way he figures it, false
certainty is better than uncertainty. Which is why he dances about
Elugelab when clearly such a dance has no bearing on your thesis.
Anyways, I really think you're onto something with the Maether
hypothesis.

Uncle Zook
From: mpc755 on 22 Jun 2010 22:33
On Jun 22, 12:12 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> <http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>
> No aether

The article you continually link to and then add 'No aether' under is
all about the aether. Your position that the article suggests there is
no aether is not supported by the article itself.

http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf

"quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible
interactions with matter"

The pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter manifests
itself as gravity.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" -
Albert Einstein

The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
matter and the state of the aether in nearby regions is the aether's
state of displacement.

http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf

"A possible candidate for dark energy that avoids some of the fine-
tuning problems associated with the cosmological is quintessence, a
very low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the
known universe. In addition to its effect on the expansion of the
universe, quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible
interactions with matter and radiation."

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quintessence

"quin·tes·sence
   /kwɪnˈtɛsəns/ Show Spelled[kwin-tes-uhns] Show IPA
–noun
1. the pure and concentrated essence of a substance.
2. the most perfect embodiment of something.
3. (in ancient and medieval philosophy) the fifth essence or element,
ether, supposed to be the constituent matter of the heavenly bodies"

A low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the
known universe is aether as a one something.

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.

Aether is the pure essence of matter.

Also from the article you continually link to:

http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf

"If future searches for Lorentz invariance and time-dependent
fundamental constants bring positive results, they may prove that the
universe contains a long-wavelength degree of freedom and point toward
the nature of quintessence. Then the variation of fundamental
constants and apparently Lorentz-violating spin precessions might be
completely demystified: They could both follow from the conventional
physics of an interacting scalar field."

The interacting scalar field is the aether as a one something. The
aether interacts with matter through the connections between the
aether and the matter. The state of the aether as determined by its
connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring
places is the aether's state of displacement.

You should actually read the articles you link to, you might learn
something.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"What is fundamentally new in the ether of the general theory of
relativity as opposed to the ether of Lorentz consists in this, that
the state of the former is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places,
which are amenable to law in the form of differential equations;
whereas the state of the Lorentzian ether in the absence of
electromagnetic fields is conditioned by nothing outside itself, and
is everywhere the same. The ether of the general theory of relativity
is transmuted conceptually into the ether of Lorentz if we substitute
constants for the functions of space which describe the former,
disregarding the causes which condition its state."
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

The cause which conditions its state is its displacement by matter.

Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047

"There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity
for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter
level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam
system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that
gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the
informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence
space effectively ‘flows’ towards matter. However this is not a ‘flow’
of some form of ‘matter’ through space, as previously considered in
the aether models or in the ‘random’ particulate Le Sage kinetic
theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the
quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a
geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the ‘flow’ in
one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not
relative to some a priori background geometrical space"

What is described as "space effectively ‘flows’ towards matter" is the
pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter.

"Then the ‘flow’ in one region is relative only to the patterns in
nearby regions" is the pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the
matter and the pressure associated the aether displaced by the matter
in nearby regions.

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.

'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A.
EINSTEIN'
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

"If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass
diminishes by L/c2."

The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer
exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as
aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three
dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether
and matter is energy.

The physical effect as matter converts to aether is energy.

Mass is conserved.
From: mpc755 on 22 Jun 2010 22:37
On Jun 22, 10:29 am, zookumar yelubandi <zooku...(a)yahoo.ca> wrote:
> mpc755 wrote:
> > > On Jun 21, 12:12 pm, zookumar yelubandi <zooku...(a)yahoo.ca> wrote:
> > > > Uncle Al wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > The physical effect of maether decompressing is energy.
> > > > > Mass is conserved.
>
> > > >    1) Elugelab, October 1952, 19:15 hrs 31 GMT.
> > > >    2) idiot
>
> > >         Elugelab does not contradict what mpc755 is proposing..  Mass is
> > > conserved precisely because *both* aether and matter have mass.  The
> > > conversion (according to mpc755) is between matter and aether, not mass
> > > and energy.  If one reads the author correctly, mass is compressed and
> > > decompressed, not created and destroyed.  Also, energy is a physical
> > > effect of this compression/decompression and is therefore either
> > > absorbed or released in the process.  This is akin to endothermic and
> > > exothermic ... although the better words are probably endodynic and
> > > exodynic.
> > >         To wit, Mass = Maether = (matter + aether).  Mass/maether is
> > > conserved.
> > >         Why are you making a munch of it in grasping a simple and highly
> > > intuitive proposition?  
> > >         Uncle Zook
> > Thanks.
>
>         You're welcome.  Of all the big brains I've ever had the
> pleasure and displeasure of encounter (of the usenet kind), Brother Al
> is perhaps the most useless of the lot ... and precisely because of the
> narrow range of ideas he espouses.  A big brain combined with a narrow
> mind is an inefficient pairing.  A shame, really.  He could've been
> something.  As it is, he'll continue to argue in favor of "papered"
> quasi-established science because, the way he figures it, false
> certainty is better than uncertainty.   Which is why he dances about
> Elugelab when clearly such a dance has no bearing on your thesis.
> Anyways, I really think you're onto something with the Maether
> hypothesis.  
>
>         Uncle Zook

Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Anders, Ebihara Re: additive versus multiplicative creation: Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #179; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Long Summary (rev 2) of 'Medical Doctors: The Sickening Force Undermining World Health and also Undermining the United Nations Organizations ...' {HRI 20100304-V6.1-SL-V2}