Einstein's Biggest Blunder - - Wasn't???
in [Physics]
|
Prev: (i) as a 90 degree rotation? Re: Algebra Number Wheel #503 Correcting Math
Next: RFC Number Factor Patterns & Riemann Zeta Function?
From: PD on 11 Mar 2010 14:24 On Mar 11, 1:15 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 11:09 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 10, 1:14 am, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > > Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. That was the > > > nitwit's only blunder. <shrug> > > > > The Cosmological constant indicates a negative mass density. It is > > > obvious that negative mass will result in antigravity in Newtonian > > > physics. <shrug> > > > However, an indication does not mean a necessary consequence. > > Recall energy and mass being equivalent? So, in this case, it is. > <shrug> Um, no. It's not energy, either. That goes in a different term. Bzzt. Please try again. > > > Therefore, your foregone conclusion that it is ruled out because it > > would yield antigravity in another theory altogether neither follows > > logically nor is at all relevant. > > Just what part of Newtonian law of gravity do you not understand? > Positive mass yields gravity according to the Newtonian law of > gravity. This indicates and leads to the consequence of negative mass > yielding antigravity. <shrug> Understood, but general relativity is not Newtonian gravity. And so a feature that is special to general relativity does not imply anything about Newtonian gravity. Bzzzt. Please try again. > > > > The suggestion of negative mass is so fvcking desperate on that > > > nitwit's part. <shrug> > > > He didn't suggest a negative mass. You did. > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was not capable of > understanding the mass-energy relationship. Now, THIS is funny, since he was the one that proposed it. Yet now you claim that he did not understand it, but that you do, and that ONLY you do, and that therefore mass-energy equivalence connects the cosmological constant and Newtonian antigravity, but that only you grasp that fact. > Apparently, you dont > either. Recall (E = m c^2)? This is a typical contradiction in the > academics among those so-called self-styled physicists. <shrug> What contradiction? You mean your boneheaded misapplication of an oversimplified generalization that leads you to believe there is a contradiction? Well done. > Their applications of mathematics involved are always comical in > nature. Ahahaha... Funny indeed.
From: Koobee Wublee on 11 Mar 2010 20:29 On Mar 11, 11:24 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 11, 1:15 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Recall energy and mass being equivalent? So, in this case, it is. > > <shrug> > > [Whining nonsense snipped] > > > Just what part of Newtonian law of gravity do you not understand? > > Positive mass yields gravity according to the Newtonian law of > > gravity. This indicates and leads to the consequence of negative mass > > yielding antigravity. <shrug> > > [More whining nonsense snipped] > > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was not capable of > > understanding the mass-energy relationship. > > [Yet more whining nonsense snipped] > > > Apparently, you dont > > either. Recall (E = m c^2)? This is a typical contradiction in the > > academics among those so-called self-styled physicists. <shrug> > > [PDs self-admitted ignorance snipped] It is a pity that a physics professor does not understand Newtonian law of gravity. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar at least giving the benefit of doubt finally understood the Newtonian law of gravity after so many years of struggle to do so. To celebrate that so-called ingenious achievement, the nitwit re-invented/re- discovered the principle of equivalence. The task of understanding the Newtonian law of gravity is still yet to be achieved by the self- styled physicists. <shrug> The suggestion of the Cosmological constant is utterly stupid in the person who even dared to utter this through his big mouth. However, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar seemed to have realized that gross mistake. In the meantime, the self-styled physicists are still indulged in this utter nonsense in the Cosmological constant which suggests negative mass density in vacuum. <shrug> Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar seems to possess slightly more reasoning capability than these self-styled physicists. It is no wonder that know-not-better self-styled physicists began to worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. <shrug> It is indeed getting too comical. Ahahahaha...
From: PD on 12 Mar 2010 15:09 On Mar 11, 7:29 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 11, 11:24 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 11, 1:15 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Recall energy and mass being equivalent? So, in this case, it is. > > > <shrug> > > > [Whining nonsense snipped] > > > > Just what part of Newtonian law of gravity do you not understand? > > > Positive mass yields gravity according to the Newtonian law of > > > gravity. This indicates and leads to the consequence of negative mass > > > yielding antigravity. <shrug> > > > [More whining nonsense snipped] > > > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was not capable of > > > understanding the mass-energy relationship. > > > [Yet more whining nonsense snipped] It's gotten pretty bad, KW, when you're only strategem is to snip everything you don't like to see, and repeat your buzzphrases with higher and higher histrionics density. > > > > Apparently, you dont > > > either. Recall (E = m c^2)? This is a typical contradiction in the > > > academics among those so-called self-styled physicists. <shrug> > > > [PDs self-admitted ignorance snipped] > > It is a pity that a physics professor does not understand Newtonian > law of gravity. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar at > least giving the benefit of doubt finally understood the Newtonian law > of gravity after so many years of struggle to do so. To celebrate > that so-called ingenious achievement, the nitwit re-invented/re- > discovered the principle of equivalence. The task of understanding > the Newtonian law of gravity is still yet to be achieved by the self- > styled physicists. <shrug> > > The suggestion of the Cosmological constant is utterly stupid in the > person who even dared to utter this through his big mouth. However, > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar seemed to have > realized that gross mistake. In the meantime, the self-styled > physicists are still indulged in this utter nonsense in the > Cosmological constant which suggests negative mass density in vacuum. > <shrug> > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar seems to possess > slightly more reasoning capability than these self-styled physicists. > It is no wonder that know-not-better self-styled physicists began to > worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. > <shrug> > > It is indeed getting too comical. Ahahahaha... Pretty soon, your foamy-lipped rants are going to be nothing but a repetitive concatenation of "worship" "Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar", "fail to understand", "utterly stupid", "utter nonsense", "self-styled physicists", "Ahahahaha..." and "<shrug>". I'm sure you realize you've relegated yourself to the bitter, cranker, whiner bleachers, with a seat behind the pole. PD
From: Koobee Wublee on 12 Mar 2010 16:46 On Mar 12, 12:09 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 11, 7:29 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > Recall energy and mass being equivalent? So, in this case, it is. > > <shrug> > > > Just what part of Newtonian law of gravity do you not understand? > > Positive mass yields gravity according to the Newtonian law of > > gravity. This indicates and leads to the consequence of negative mass > > yielding antigravity. <shrug> > > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was not capable of > > understanding the mass-energy relationship. > > It's gotten pretty bad, KW... In another words, the truth hurts you so much. <shrug> > > Apparently, you dont > > either. Recall (E = m c^2)? This is a typical contradiction in the > > academics among those so-called self-styled physicists. <shrug> > > > It is a pity that a physics professor does not understand Newtonian > > law of gravity. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar at > > least giving the benefit of doubt finally understood the Newtonian law > > of gravity after so many years of struggle to do so. To celebrate > > that so-called ingenious achievement, the nitwit re-invented/re- > > discovered the principle of equivalence. The task of understanding > > the Newtonian law of gravity is still yet to be achieved by the self- > > styled physicists. <shrug> > > > The suggestion of the Cosmological constant is utterly stupid in the > > person who even dared to utter this through his big mouth. However, > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar seemed to have > > realized that gross mistake. In the meantime, the self-styled > > physicists are still indulged in this utter nonsense in the > > Cosmological constant which suggests negative mass density in vacuum. > > <shrug> > > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar seems to possess > > slightly more reasoning capability than these self-styled physicists. > > It is no wonder that know-not-better self-styled physicists began to > > worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. > > <shrug> > > > It is indeed getting too comical. Ahahahaha... > > Pretty soon, your foamy-lipped rants are going to be nothing but a > repetitive concatenation of "worship" "Einstein the nitwit, the > plagiarist, and the liar", "fail to understand", "utterly stupid", > "utter nonsense", "self-styled physicists", "Ahahahaha..." and > "<shrug>". Well, what I have said are true. Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar as yours truly have effortlessly pointed out. Anyone who fails to understand negative mass would lead to the consequence of antigravity does not understand Newtonian law of gravity. When pointed out so, if still unable to comprehend, hey stupidity is a complimentary remark. Folks who cannot do physics but call themselves physicists need to be distinguished themselves as self- styled physicists. What else? What have I said is untruthful and not applied? > I'm sure you realize you've relegated yourself to the bitter, cranker, > whiner bleachers, with a seat behind the pole. You need to get back to reality instead of indulging in your fantasy world where ** A nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar is a God ** Existence of negative mass in vacuum ** Aloof in your head that you are the only one who can do physics ** Teaching to ones who are not capable of thinking for themselves .... Of course, and more... Got to go. Sayonara.
From: PD on 12 Mar 2010 17:06
On Mar 12, 3:46 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 12, 12:09 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 11, 7:29 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > > Recall energy and mass being equivalent? So, in this case, it is. > > > <shrug> > > > > Just what part of Newtonian law of gravity do you not understand? > > > Positive mass yields gravity according to the Newtonian law of > > > gravity. This indicates and leads to the consequence of negative mass > > > yielding antigravity. <shrug> > > > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was not capable of > > > understanding the mass-energy relationship. > > > It's gotten pretty bad, KW... > > In another words, the truth hurts you so much. <shrug> > > > > > > Apparently, you dont > > > either. Recall (E = m c^2)? This is a typical contradiction in the > > > academics among those so-called self-styled physicists. <shrug> > > > > It is a pity that a physics professor does not understand Newtonian > > > law of gravity. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar at > > > least giving the benefit of doubt finally understood the Newtonian law > > > of gravity after so many years of struggle to do so. To celebrate > > > that so-called ingenious achievement, the nitwit re-invented/re- > > > discovered the principle of equivalence. The task of understanding > > > the Newtonian law of gravity is still yet to be achieved by the self- > > > styled physicists. <shrug> > > > > The suggestion of the Cosmological constant is utterly stupid in the > > > person who even dared to utter this through his big mouth. However, > > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar seemed to have > > > realized that gross mistake. In the meantime, the self-styled > > > physicists are still indulged in this utter nonsense in the > > > Cosmological constant which suggests negative mass density in vacuum. > > > <shrug> > > > > Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar seems to possess > > > slightly more reasoning capability than these self-styled physicists. > > > It is no wonder that know-not-better self-styled physicists began to > > > worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. > > > <shrug> > > > > It is indeed getting too comical. Ahahahaha... > > > Pretty soon, your foamy-lipped rants are going to be nothing but a > > repetitive concatenation of "worship" "Einstein the nitwit, the > > plagiarist, and the liar", "fail to understand", "utterly stupid", > > "utter nonsense", "self-styled physicists", "Ahahahaha..." and > > "<shrug>". > > Well, what I have said are true. Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a > plagiarist, and a liar as yours truly have effortlessly pointed out. That's exactly right. You've expended no effort whatsoever, and it shows. It requires absolutely no effort to spout nonsense, and you're adept at spouting nonsense effortlessly. But do tell yourself that you've Made Your Point and That's Enough For You. > Anyone who fails to understand negative mass would lead to the > consequence of antigravity does not understand Newtonian law of > gravity. When pointed out so, if still unable to comprehend, hey > stupidity is a complimentary remark. Folks who cannot do physics but > call themselves physicists need to be distinguished themselves as self- > styled physicists. What else? What have I said is untruthful and not > applied? > > > I'm sure you realize you've relegated yourself to the bitter, cranker, > > whiner bleachers, with a seat behind the pole. > > You need to get back to reality instead of indulging in your fantasy > world where > > ** A nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar is a God He's a dead physicist. I see no physicists calling him a God. I see foamy-mouthed splutterers calling him a God. > > ** Existence of negative mass in vacuum I've already told you there is no necessity of negative mass in the vacuum. You spluttered and said the cosmological constant "suggests" negative mass to you, and further dug yourself deeper by suggesting that the cosmological constant suggests negative energy too, and that therefore mass-energy equivalence suggests negative mass. > > ** Aloof in your head that you are the only one who can do physics Not at all. What is clear, though, is that YOU cannot do physics. Recognizing this obvious fact (as does everyone except for you, apparently) does not make me aloof. > > ** Teaching to ones who are not capable of thinking for themselves On the contrary. My students have been exceptionally capable of thinking for themselves, and they do most of the work in figuring this stuff out. On the other hand, someone who reflexively says "bullshit" and cannot do a lick of physics correctly should not be patting himself on the head about thinking for himself. Knee-jerking himself, maybe, but thinking, no. > > ... Of course, and more... > > Got to go. > > Sayonara. Bye. Enjoy your cup of bile from your own intestines. |