Einstein's Biggest Blunder - - Wasn't???
in [Physics]
|
Prev: (i) as a 90 degree rotation? Re: Algebra Number Wheel #503 Correcting Math
Next: RFC Number Factor Patterns & Riemann Zeta Function?
From: spudnik on 12 Mar 2010 18:21 read _The Big Bang Never Happened" by Eric Lerner, student of the late Johannes Alfven (I have not). thus: what a bunch of silliness. the only real question is, how much energy was in "de planes," compared to the rather small amount that is required for a "controlled demo?" that is to say, were the planes not adequate bombs? thus: the "official" report (NIST) does have interesting stuff in it -- I linked to it via the link to Wiki -- for example, "Figure 9.3. Minimum heating of reinforced heavy columns to initiate global collapse," which shows "temperature range for a 50% redicution in steel strength," as opposed to the typical desideratum of "melting" that is promoted. > http://www.mujca.com thus: please, don't bother with the pro-hominemania of your supposed status as a practicing physicist and/or trained netdoggy! proabably most of the interpretation of the EPR "paradox" results, a la Alain Aspect et al, is due to the ideal of a photon, in assinging all of the energy of the wave-front as a "mass" (electron-voltage, say) of a particle, whence the wave-energy was somehow collected by the photoeletrical device. here are two ways to get over this: a) just consider the practice of audio quantization, the phonon; b) show how the photoelectrical device is actually tuned to absorb a particular frequency of light. so, is the "phonon" just one cycle of the period of the sound, and like-wise, is the photon just one cycle of the frequency? --Light: A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ --The Ides of March Are Coming: Pro-Impeachment Democrat Wins Nomination in Texas! http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100303kesha_victory.html
From: Ashton K on 15 Mar 2010 10:36 Probably the weirdest non sequitor I've seen in a while. --Ashton In sci.math spudnik <Space998(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > read _The Big Bang Never Happened" by Eric Lerner, > student of the late Johannes Alfven (I have not). > > thus: > what a bunch of silliness. the only real question is, > how much energy was in "de planes," > compared to the rather small amount that is required > for a "controlled demo?" that is to say, > were the planes not adequate bombs? > > thus: > the "official" report (NIST) does have interesting stuff in it > -- I linked to it via the link to Wiki -- > for example, "Figure 9.3. Minimum heating of reinforced heavy columns > to initiate global collapse," which shows "temperature range > for a 50% redicution in steel strength," as opposed > to the typical desideratum of "melting" that is promoted. > >> http://www.mujca.com > > thus: > please, don't bother > with the pro-hominemania of your supposed status > as a practicing physicist and/or trained netdoggy! > proabably most of the interpretation of the EPR "paradox" > results, > a la Alain Aspect et al, is due to the ideal of a photon, > in assinging all of the energy of the wave-front > as a "mass" (electron-voltage, say) of a particle, whence > the wave-energy was somehow collected > by the photoeletrical device. here are two ways to get over this: a) > just consider the practice of audio quantization, the phonon; b) > show how the photoelectrical device is actually tuned > to absorb a particular frequency of light. > so, is the "phonon" just one cycle of the period of the sound, > and > like-wise, is the photon just one cycle of the frequency? > > --Light: A History! > http://wlym.com > > --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! > http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ > > --The Ides of March Are Coming: > Pro-Impeachment Democrat > Wins Nomination in Texas! > http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100303kesha_victory.html
From: spudnik on 15 Mar 2010 15:04 see the book by Lerner, _The Big Bang Never -- just kidding. it seems taht he has a hotkey/macro to insert that phraseology, but there is a case to be made for some of it, or, just "herr docktor-professor Albert, the Showman." of course, it doesn't do much for his own Theory of Nuthin'; eh? anyway, Eisntein's biggest blunder was with "homopolar generators," and getting in over his head with Maxwell's wunnerful theory, which is also problematic; or, so saith my school (and Schroedinger's cat, in Meowse Code .-) thus: proabably most of the interpretation of the EPR "paradox" results, a la Alain Aspect et al, is due to the ideal of a photon, in assinging all of the energy of the wave-front as a "mass" (electron-voltage, say) of a particle, whence the wave-energy was somehow collected by the photo- eletrical device. here are two ways to get over this: a) just consider the practice of audio quantization, the phonon; b) show how the photoelectrical device is actually tuned to absorb a particular frequency of light. so, is the "phonon" just one cycle of the period of the sound, and like-wise, is the photon just one cycle of the frequency? --Light: A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ --The Ides of March Are Coming: Pro-Impeachment Democrat Wins Nomination in Texas! http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100303kesha_victory.html
From: Koobee Wublee on 15 Mar 2010 16:33 On Mar 12, 3:06 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, what I have said are true. Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a > > plagiarist, and a liar as yours truly have effortlessly pointed out. > > That's exactly right... I know that is exactly right. Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. <shrug> > > Anyone who fails to understand negative mass would lead to the > > consequence of antigravity does not understand Newtonian law of > > gravity. When pointed out so, if still unable to comprehend, hey > > stupidity is a complimentary remark. Folks who cannot do physics but > > call themselves physicists need to be distinguished themselves as self- > > styled physicists. What else? What have I said is untruthful and not > > applied? > > > You need to get back to reality instead of indulging in your fantasy > > world where > > > ** A nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar is a God > > He's a dead physicist. I see no physicists calling him a God. I see > foamy-mouthed splutterers calling him a God. Einstein was no physicist but a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. <shrug> You have continued to worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. <shrug> > > ** Existence of negative mass in vacuum > > I've already told you there is no necessity of negative mass in the > vacuum. You spluttered and said the cosmological constant "suggests" > negative mass to you, and further dug yourself deeper by suggesting > that the cosmological constant suggests negative energy too, and that > therefore mass-energy equivalence suggests negative mass. I see you are getting insane with contradictory ideas. Mass is energy, and energy is mass. If energy is negative, it indicates and leads to negative mass. <shrug> > > ** Aloof in your head that you are the only one who can do physics > > Not at all. What is clear, though, is that YOU cannot do physics. > Recognizing this obvious fact (as does everyone except for you, > apparently) does not make me aloof. See what I mean. You remain aloof in your own madness trying to reconcile several contradictory ideas. You are this caricature. http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/BenitoAndrocles.jpg > > ** Teaching to ones who are not capable of thinking for themselves > > On the contrary. My students have been exceptionally capable of > thinking for themselves, and they do most of the work in figuring this > stuff out. On the other hand, someone who reflexively says "bullshit" > and cannot do a lick of physics correctly should not be patting > himself on the head about thinking for himself. Knee-jerking himself, > maybe, but thinking, no. Believing that your students to think for themselves is not the same as your students able to think for themselves. <shrug> > Bye. Enjoy your cup of bile from your own intestines. I am glad you have enjoyed all the bile from my intestines I have sent you. Keep enjoying them. It is the only think an ignorant college professor of physics is good for --- disposal of waste product. Ahahahaha...
From: Koobee Wublee on 15 Mar 2010 16:34
I can assure you that I am not being payed by the word. Ones who are incapable of thinking for themselves need to be reminded of what a nitwit, a plagiarist, and liar that Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was merely a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. There is absolutely no need to be hateful of a nitwit, a plagiarist, and liar such as Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar, and there is absolute no need to be jealous of a nitwit, a plagiarist, and liar such as Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. <shrug> Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was no imagination. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was reality. <shrug> Obviously, you possess no aptitude to understand the subject matter thus resorting to be spoon fed with the fermented diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. <shrug> |