Electrons ALL emit packets of energy just like photons, but much smaller scale.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Tomorrow they are ready to start the LHC collider. The Earth can ?be exploded in a 1000 seconds!
Next: 473 nm
From: BURT on 26 Feb 2010 17:05 On Feb 26, 10:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 26, 10:49 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 25, 3:31 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 25, 10:00 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > > > What do we call these tiny photon-like packets of energy > > > > coming off every electron? > > > > Nanophotons? > > > > I think they have already been named: > > > > > Magnetons. > > > > > john > > > >- I know you believe everything that exists is made of smaller pieces, > > > -but it is useful to characterize them in a way that distinguishes them > > > -from the assembly and you haven't done that here. As far as anyone can > > > -tell from what you've written, you're only talking about smaller > > > -photons. Small dogs are still dogs, they're not pieces of bigger dogs. > > > OK, let's call them magnetons. > > Why call smaller photons magnetons? When do they cease becoming > describable as photons and start becoming describable as magnetons?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - If virtual EM is real why do we not see its light? Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 26 Feb 2010 17:09 On Feb 26, 10:32 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 26, 10:49 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 25, 3:31 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 25, 10:00 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > > > What do we call these tiny photon-like packets of energy > > > > coming off every electron? > > > > Nanophotons? > > > > I think they have already been named: > > > > > Magnetons. > > > > > john > > > >- I know you believe everything that exists is made of smaller pieces, > > > -but it is useful to characterize them in a way that distinguishes them > > > -from the assembly and you haven't done that here. As far as anyone can > > > -tell from what you've written, you're only talking about smaller > > > -photons. Small dogs are still dogs, they're not pieces of bigger dogs. > > > OK, let's call them magnetons. > > Why call smaller photons magnetons? When do they cease becoming > describable as photons and start becoming describable as magnetons?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - There is no virtual electric energy or magentic aether oscillation. Mitch Raemsch
From: Y.Porat on 27 Feb 2010 00:35 On Feb 25, 6:00 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > What do we call these tiny photon-like packets of energy > coming off every electron? > Nanophotons? > I think they have already been named: > > Magnetons. > > john see my thread 'A new corrected definition for a ' real single photon' energy emission it is ======================= E single photon = n hf while 0 < n <<<< 1.0000 ======================= ATB Y.Porat ------------------------
From: BURT on 27 Feb 2010 01:33 On Feb 26, 9:35 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 25, 6:00 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > What do we call these tiny photon-like packets of energy > > coming off every electron? > > Nanophotons? > > I think they have already been named: > > > Magnetons. > > > john > > see my thread > 'A new corrected definition for a ' real single photon' energy > emission > > it is > ======================= > E single photon = n hf > while > 0 < n <<<< 1.0000 > ======================= > ATB > Y.Porat > ------------------------ Set H bar to zero and the energy of light is all in its frequency. Mitch Raemsch
From: Y.Porat on 27 Feb 2010 02:28
On Feb 27, 8:33 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 26, 9:35 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 25, 6:00 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > > What do we call these tiny photon-like packets of energy > > > coming off every electron? > > > Nanophotons? > > > I think they have already been named: > > > > Magnetons. > > > > john > > > see my thread > > 'A new corrected definition for a ' real single photon' energy > > emission > > > it is > > ======================= > > E single photon = n hf > > while > > 0 < n <<<< 1.0000 > > ======================= > > ATB > > Y.Porat > > ------------------------ > > Set H bar to zero and the energy of light is all in its frequency. > > Mitch Raemsch -------------------------- frequency is a scalar associated with time therefore frequency in itself is time duratiion dependent or if you like -- the number of wave lengths per second if you want to say that f is defining th e ***amount** of energy then i am with you!! you must be more accurate .... ATB Y.Porat -------------------- |