From: Robert Haar on
On 5/24/10 8:17 PM, "Kir�ly" <me(a)home.spamsucks.ca> wrote:

> Can anyone suggest how I can encrypt those scans on my Mac (10.5.8) so
> that they can be easily decrypted on a Windows machine? Preferably
> without having to install additional decrypting software on the Windows
> machine? I know nothing at all about Windows and so I have no idea
> what decrpytion tools are preinstalled.

Would a hardware solution appeal? There are a couple of USB storage devices
that have encryption built in. You could put your sensitive data onto the
USB device (in the secured area) and then lug that into the target machine
and access the files as long as you have the key.


From: Warren Oates on
In article <C1XKn.4805$Z6.3114(a)edtnps82>, me(a)home.spamsucks.ca (Király)
wrote:

> I don't have an Intel Mac, which PGP seems to require.

http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgp/versions/freeware/mac/8.0/
--
Very old woody beets will never cook tender.
-- Fannie Farmer
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kir=E1ly?= on
Warren Oates <warren.oates(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't have an Intel Mac, which PGP seems to require.
>
> http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgp/versions/freeware/mac/8.0/

That too links to an Intel-only version.

I have taken David's suggestion and downloaded TrueCrypt. It seemed to
work just fine on the Mac end of things. I will try tomorrow at work to
see how easy it is to decrypt on Windows.

--
K.

Lang may your lum reek.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kir=E1ly?= on
Lewis <g.kreme(a)gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> You could also put the scans into a pdf and password protect the PDF,
> right?

That would be an excellent solution, but is the encryption method used
really secure? Searching online for "decrypt PDF" brings up lots of
tools that claim to be able to crack PDF encryption. Or am I
misunderstanding?

If OS X's built-in PDF encryption really is worth its salt then that is
definitely the route I will go.

--
K.

Lang may your lum reek.
From: David Ryeburn on
In article <0V3Mn.5150$Z6.4203(a)edtnps82>, me(a)home.spamsucks.ca (Kir�ly)
wrote:

> I tried TrueCrypt and it failed one of my tests - that
> being to log on to a Windows machine in a public library (a situation
> that I'd likely be in if I were to need to access those files) and try
> to download and install the decrypting software there.

This doesn't surprise me. However if you could use a Mac or PC belonging to
a friend who trusts you enough to let you install TrueCrypt, then you'd be
OK.

You don't need to download the TrueCrypt software, provided you can rely on
not losing a USB Flash unit, or having it stolen. You can put your encrypted
files as well as installation software for both Mac and Windows versions of
TrueCrypt on such a device.

> This is why I'd
> like to find a solution that won't require installing any additional
> software on the windows box - most public access terminals likely won't
> allow me to download and install software.

If you put unencrypted versions of your files inside the Public folder
inside your Dropbox and memorize the URLs for those files you can access
them, without using any decryption software, from any computer having web
access and a web browser. What distinguishes the URL of one of my files in
the Public folder inside my Dropbox folder from any other file inside the
Public folder inside anyone else's Dropbox folder is a seven digit number
(the same for all the files inside my Dropbox folder, so you have 10^7
guesses) and the name of the file itself (which you could make weird enough
for it to be hard to guess). If I just use the 7 digit number and not the
file name the response is the following:

Oops! (404)
We can't find the page you're looking for.
Check out our FAQ or forums for help.
Or maybe you should try heading home.

The advantages and disadvantages of using Dropbox in this way are obvious.
One way around the problem of people or bots finding your files by random
search, unlikely though that may be, is to encrypt the files in such a way
that you can decrypt them in your head. I wouldn't use ROT13, but something
not much more complicated than that would keep anyone or anything stumbling
upon your files from having a significant probability of getting anything
meaningful out of them.

As I indicated, I mainly use TrueCrypt when exchanging information with my
wife and our children, all of whom have the software installed on their
computers. If you come up with a solution to the problem which doesn't
require a friend who trusts you and which is more secure than my Dropbox
approach, I would appreciate hearing about it.

David

--
David Ryeburn
david_ryeburn(a)telus.netz
To send e-mail, use "net" instead of "netz".
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: iTunes - iPhoto conflict
Next: iphoto second library