Prev: Stock market competition: requrest for help
Next: Binding Problem - any proposed solution from you guys?
From: Uncle Al on 22 Jun 2010 10:40 "vincent64(a)yahoo.com" wrote: > > On Jun 21, 5:04 pm, Sam <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 21, 6:57 pm, "vincen...(a)yahoo.com" <datashap...(a)gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Assuming that the Universe is compact and expanding at a constant rate > > > in all directions, and using a model of the Universe that seems > > > reasonable: > > > > > 1) Can we measure the minimum speed v at which a particle must move > > > (assuming it is moving in the same direction in a curved Universe), in > > > order to come back indefinitely to its initial position? > > > > There is no absolute reference frame. > > > > No Center > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html > > How can you have no center and either expand or collapse: [snip] EVERY point in the universe is at its exact center. All 4(pi) steradians exactly point to an equidistant Big Bang. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: vincent64 on 22 Jun 2010 17:06 On Jun 22, 7:07 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jun 21, 8:42 pm, "vincen...(a)yahoo.com" <datashap...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 5:04 pm, Sam <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 21, 6:57 pm, "vincen...(a)yahoo.com" <datashap...(a)gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > Assuming that the Universe is compact and expanding at a constant rate > > > > in all directions, and using a model of the Universe that seems > > > > reasonable: > > > > > 1) Can we measure the minimum speed v at which a particle must move > > > > (assuming it is moving in the same direction in a curved Universe), in > > > > order to come back indefinitely to its initial position? > > > > There is no absolute reference frame. > > > > No Center > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > > > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > > > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html > > > How can you have no center and either expand or collapse: if you have > > no center, then from where are you expanding - from which reference > > point? > > Any reference point. The surface of a sphere has no center, yet it > can expand. Points on the surface appear to move away from each other > and any point is as good as any other. This link below will tell you how to compute the center of a sphere surface: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Sphere.html Keep in mind that you are talking about mathematical models of the universe. These are just models and approximation of the real world. Nevertheless, a sphere center has a center. > > >You can expand and have no center if you are not compact > > (meaning e.g. that the average distance between 2 closest neighboring > > stars is increasing over time, on average), but if you believe that > > the universe is not compact, then how do you explain the big bang? Was > > the universe compact (finite) when the big bang happened, and > > suddenly, one day the universe became infinite (non compact)? > > No one has recently suggested the universe is infinite. In fact, > Olbers showed it can't be infinite based on what we understand about > light in a very clever paradox. Modern cosmology, based on GR, > suggests that the universe is finite but unbounded (like the fore- > mentioned spherical surface).- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: Sam on 22 Jun 2010 20:58 On Jun 22, 4:06 pm, "vincen...(a)yahoo.com" <datashap...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Keep in mind that you are talking about mathematical models of the > universe. These are just models and approximation of the real world. > Nevertheless, a sphere center has a center. > > Every Point is the center of the expansion. No Center http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Stock market competition: requrest for help Next: Binding Problem - any proposed solution from you guys? |