Experts doubt Einstein..... but Einstein Dingleberries still worship him
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 398.0: USA Proves Flexagons Related to Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
Next: The Necessity of an experiment (classical electrodynamics) that should have been done 100 years ago
From: hanson on 1 Jun 2010 04:30 "Einstein was right?" yields 148,000 Google hits, posted by disciples of Einstein's cult, known as Einstein Dingleberries. > When googling for "Einstein was wrong, stupid, a plagiarist, fraud, liar, thief, nitwit, fool & idiot" in 9 individual Google searches with the above attributes (all of which appeared in sci.physics) then the accumultated sum shows 5'165'800 Google hits... ahahahAHAHA > One can argue about this anyway one wishes, but the hand writing is on the wall. --- Einstein's con has run its course. His 15 minutes are up... ... "You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. -- by Abraham Lincoln. > Albert's Dingleberries will moan, groan & howl over this... ahahaha Details of this trend is shown below in Arthur's post who wrote: > "Me, ...again!" <arthures(a)mv.com> wrote in message news:Pine.BSF.4.61.1005250817140.61930(a)osmium.mv.net... Was Einstein right or wrong? What we have are two schools of thought: i) Einstein did something, vs. ii) a bunch of experts/skeptics who think Einstein made a lot of noise, more heat than light, and fooled a lot of people. Here, below, are many more books which cast much doubt on Einstein's "contributions"...... (all dug up by searches on Amazon.com under: au=einstein) Note that most of these books were written in the last decade or two. If we do a search going back to the beginnings of SR, GR, then I'm sure there will be found many many dozens of books written by equally smart people who challenge and/or do not accept Einstein. I think it would be foolish to think the story is over, final, and finished. //////////////////////////////////////// Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius [Paperback] Hans C. Ohanian (Author) ================================ Einstein's Greatest Mistake: Abandonment of the Aether by Sid Deutsch ================================================== Questioning Einstein: Is Relativity Necessary? by, Tom Bethell Review.... That a book by a great and established writer like Tom Bethell, who is a long-time science writer and political columnist at The American Spectator, hasn't been officially reviewed yet, says more about those who pose as the intellectual and editorial guardians of literature than it does about the quality of this book or the stature of its author. In fact, it is an engaging, well researched book about one of the most interesting paradigm struggles of the twentieth century (and still ongoing today). That Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (SR) was influenced by and made quickly popular by the relativistic ideologies of its time (1905) seems to this writer a foregone conclusion. But it was the Michelson-Morley experiment that failed to detect a "luminiferous ether," which gave SR scientific credibility. But Michelson himself soon doubted its conclusions and proved it in the later Michelson-Gale experiment which did detect an ether. H. Lorentz, a contemporary of Einstein, and a scientist of equal stature, argued in numerous debates with Einstein that all "relativistic effects" (such as the bending of starlight as it passes near the sun) were the result of light traveling through an "entrained ether" which surrounds and moves with planetary bodies--otherwise known as the gravitational field. Other well-known physicists of the day also doubted the veracity of SR, especially its principle of space-time distortion. A few were: Herbert Dingle, whose "paradox" asked the question of which "clock" would run slow (and thus experience time dilation predicted by SR) of two relativistic travelers; as for example two rocket ships in different inertial frames (i.e., going at different speeds relative to each other). Another physicist, H. Ives, of the famous Ives-Stillwell experiment to test the Doppler effect of fast moving mesons, became a lifelong enemy of Einstein because he felt that his results were being misinterpreted. And there were many others who disagreed with Einstein's fundamental conclusions. Even Einstein himself, as Bethell points out, later in life admitted that forces propagating through empty space without a medium in which they could be conveyed, was a logical absurdity--a fact never mentioned in textbooks, or in other "easy Einstein" books. In the later part of the twentieth century, other scientific critics picked up where Lorentz and his contemporaries had left off. Among them were Tom Van Flandern, Carver Mead, and Petr Beckmann. Bethell concentrates on Beckmann's critique, written in a technical book called Einstein Plus Two, in which the author claims that all the effects of both Special and General Relativity can be explained using classical physics. Bethell brings Beckmann's book down to earth from the arcane heights of Mt. Olympus by rendering Beckmann's mathematical descriptions understandable to the layman. If you are interested in the history of one of the most pivotal scientific ideas of our time, if you have always believed that the world should make sense but would still like to know about the mysteries of relativity, this book may be for you. And this reviewer might add that although Bethell might not know it yet, this may be his most significant book. ===================================================== Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories by Al Kelly review... Al Kelly is right, July 3, 2009 By Alvin D. Heindel "another patent examiner" (USA) - See all my reviews This review is from: Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (Paperback) Al Kelly should be commended for his courage in standing up to the Einsteinian science mafia. The twin paradox proves Einsteinian relativity is impossible. Einstein's theories should be called absolutivity which is another logical contradiction. It was created when scientists believed in the steady state theory of the universe. Now that scientists accept Hubble's big bang theory and the fact that the earth's velocity has been measured relative to the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the big bang, it shows you can measure an absolute velocity based on Einstein's theories. Also, scientists believe there's nothing outside the event horizon around our universe. This provides us with another means for measuring a velocity relative to a point in space which is an absolute velocity based on Einstein's theories. Obviously, space and aether are infinite and gravity is an aether density gradient, not curved space. Kelly doesn't mention G. BURNISTON BROWN's discussion of the twin paradox in the Bulletin of the Institute of Physics and Physical Society, Vol. 18 (March, 1967) pp. 71--77, easily found on the internet. He provides another good anti-Einstein argument based on the twin paradox. I tend to think H. A. Lorentz's theory might be the best one. Also, Einstein insisted relativity depends on the existence of the aether which is denied by the physics establishment. SRT depends on the existence of the aether, the same way Newtonian relativity depends on the existence of space. In Lorentz's theory, the aether is NOT at absolute rest. A. J. Kox gives a translation of one paragraph from one of Lorentz's articles: 37 It should be emphasized that LORENTZ did not adhere to the idea of absolute space. In LORENTZ (1895) (sect. 2), for instance, he states that it is meaningless to talk about absolute rest of the ether and that the expression 'the ether is at rest' only means that the different parts of the ether do not move with respect to each other (AHESc-1988 pages 67-78). This is given as a reference: 1895 Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten K�rpern (Leiden: Brill, 1895); repr. in CP, Vol. 5, pp. 1-138. The 1906 reprint can be downloaded from Google books. ======================================================== Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist by Christopher Jon Bjerknes (Paperback - July 2002) ====================================== Einstein's Riddle: Riddles, Paradoxes, and Conundrums to Stretch Your Mind by Jeremy Stangroom (Hardcover - Apr. 28, 2009) ================================================= Reinventing Gravity: A Physicist Goes Beyond Einstein by John W. Moffat (Hardcover - Sept. 30, 2008) ==================================== What Einstein Did Not See: Redefining Time to Understand Space by Thomas W. Sills (Paperback - June 1, 2009) ============================================= Einstein's Greatest Blunder?: The Cosmological Constant and Other Fudge Factors in the Physics of the Universe (Questions of Science) by Donald Goldsmith (Paperback - Oct. 15, 1997) ============================================= Dialog About Objections Against the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein (Paperback - Nov. 12, 2009) ============================================================ The Quantum Theory of Planck, Einstein, Bohr and Sommerfeld: Its Foundation and the Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925 1 (The Historical Development of ... and the Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925) by Jagdish Mehra and H. Rechenberg (Paperback - Dec. 28, 2000) ====================================== The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers: A Counter-Revolution in Physics by Dean Turner; Richard Hazelett (Paperback - Oct. 1, 2005) ========================================================== Einstein on Trial or Metaphysical Principles of Natural Philosophy by Jorge Cespedes-Cure (Paperback - July 1, 2002) ======================================================= Einstein as Myth and Muse by Alan J. Friedman and Carol C. Donley (Paperback - Apr. 28, 1989) ======================================== Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) ~ Kamen George Kamenov (Author), Kamen G. Kamenov (Illustrator 1 of 2 people found the following review helpful: A classic book.!!!, December 4, 2008 By Peter Stone (USA) - See all my reviews This review is from: Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) In 1972 the famous British professor Herbert Dingle, an ex-relativist who turned into antirelativist, published a book against relativity titled: Science at the crossroads. Because of that he was gradually removed from the "scientiffic" establishment. Kamen Kamenov's book is one of the books, alongside those of Herbert Dingle, Harald Nordenson and Henri Bergson, highly recommendable to those who really want to understand how incurably flawed and useless the "theory" in question is and why it should be abandoned in its entirety. Some books are hard to find. Look in "bookfinder.com" and read about the above mentionned autors in Wikipedia. 7 of 12 people found the following review helpful: A revolutionary new book !, May 30, 2001 By Robert (Berkeley,California) - See all my reviews This review is from: Space, Time and Matter, and the Falsity of Einstein's Theory of Relativity (Paperback) Provocative and fascinating. Mr. Kamenov provides the clearest possible nonmathematical explanation of the present day understanding of the theory of relativity and then unmistakably disproves it. His logic is undeniable . I think that after reading the book nobody can believe in the validity of the theory of relatvity any longer but quite the opposite is true,the theory is wrong. Mr. Kamenov explains in plain langauge the real nature of relity and offers alternative solution to the theory of relativity. He proves the existence of ether. The book deals not only with theory of relativity but also with the philosophy of space, time and physical matter and explains in a plain , nonmathematical way the nature of electricity , magnetism and gravitation. This book is realy easy to understand but it requires an abstract thinking . It is a great exercise for the mind and Mr. Kamenov is a great mind. I read the book several times and every time it was even more interesting. I could not stop reading it. I believe that this book will revolutionize the modern science. It is a real treasure. ============================= Einstein, the Aether & Variable Rest Mass (Paperback) ~ Jack Heighway (Author) ================================= Einstein's Relativity Theory: Correct, Paradoxical, and Wrong by Lyubomir, T. Gruyitch (Hardcover - Dec. 6, 2006) ////////////////////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////////// --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Helmut Wabnig hwabnig on 1 Jun 2010 07:05 On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 01:30:35 -0700, "hanson" <hanson(a)quick.net> wrote: >"Einstein was right?" yields 148,000 Google hits, posted by >disciples of Einstein's cult, known as Einstein Dingleberries. >> >When googling for "Einstein was wrong, stupid, a plagiarist, fraud, >liar, thief, nitwit, fool & idiot" in 9 individual Google searches with >the above attributes (all of which appeared in sci.physics) then the >accumultated sum shows 5'165'800 Google hits... ahahahAHAHA >> >One can argue about this anyway one wishes, but the hand writing >is on the wall. --- Einstein's con has run its course. His 15 minutes >are up... ... "You can fool all the people some of the time, and >some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people >all the time. -- by Abraham Lincoln. >> >Albert's Dingleberries will moan, groan & howl over this... ahahaha >Details of this trend is shown below in Arthur's post who wrote: >> >"Me, ...again!" <arthures(a)mv.com> wrote in message >news:Pine.BSF.4.61.1005250817140.61930(a)osmium.mv.net... > >Was Einstein right or wrong? > >What we have are two schools of thought: >i) Einstein did something, vs. >ii) a bunch of experts/skeptics who think Einstein made a lot of noise, >more heat than light, and fooled a lot of people. > >Here, below, are many more books which cast much doubt on >Einstein's "contributions"...... > >(all dug up by searches on Amazon.com under: au=einstein) > >Note that most of these books were written in the last decade or two. If >we do a search going back to the beginnings of SR, GR, then I'm sure >there will be found many many dozens of books written by equally smart >people who challenge and/or do not accept Einstein. > >I think it would be foolish to think the story is over, final, and >finished. > >//////////////////////////////////////// > >Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius [Paperback] >Hans C. Ohanian (Author) > >================================ > >Einstein's Greatest Mistake: Abandonment of the Aether >by Sid Deutsch > >================================================== > >Questioning Einstein: Is Relativity Necessary? >by, Tom Bethell > >Review.... >That a book by a great and established writer like Tom Bethell, >who is a long-time science writer and political columnist at The >American Spectator, hasn't been officially reviewed yet, says >more about those who pose as the intellectual and editorial >guardians of literature than it does about the quality of this >book or the stature of its author. In fact, it is an engaging, >well researched book about one of the most interesting paradigm >struggles of the twentieth century (and still ongoing today). >That Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (SR) was influenced >by and made quickly popular by the relativistic ideologies of >its time (1905) seems to this writer a foregone conclusion. >But it was the Michelson-Morley experiment that failed to >detect a "luminiferous ether," which gave SR scientific credibility. >But Michelson himself soon doubted its conclusions and proved it in >the later Michelson-Gale experiment which did detect an ether. > >H. Lorentz, a contemporary of Einstein, and a scientist of equal >stature, argued in numerous debates with Einstein that all >"relativistic effects" (such as the bending of starlight as it >passes near the sun) were the result of light traveling through >an "entrained ether" which surrounds and moves with planetary >bodies--otherwise known as the gravitational field. Other >well-known physicists of the day also doubted the veracity of >SR, especially its principle of space-time distortion. A few >were: Herbert Dingle, whose "paradox" asked the question of >which "clock" would run slow (and thus experience time dilation >predicted by SR) of two relativistic travelers; as for example two >rocket ships in different inertial frames (i.e., going at different >speeds relative to each other). Another physicist, H. Ives, of the >famous Ives-Stillwell experiment to test the Doppler effect of >fast moving mesons, became a lifelong enemy of Einstein because >he felt that his results were being misinterpreted. And there were >many others who disagreed with Einstein's fundamental conclusions. > >Even Einstein himself, as Bethell points out, later in life admitted >that forces propagating through empty space without a medium in >which they could be conveyed, was a logical absurdity--a fact never >mentioned in textbooks, or in other "easy Einstein" books. In the >later part of the twentieth century, other scientific critics picked >up where Lorentz and his contemporaries had left off. Among them were >Tom Van Flandern, Carver Mead, and Petr Beckmann. Bethell concentrates >on Beckmann's critique, written in a technical book called Einstein >Plus Two, in which the author claims that all the effects of both >Special and General Relativity can be explained using classical >physics. Bethell brings Beckmann's book down to earth from the arcane >heights of Mt. Olympus by rendering Beckmann's mathematical descriptions >understandable to the layman. > >If you are interested in the history of one of the most pivotal scientific >ideas of our time, if you have always believed that the world should >make sense but would still like to know about the mysteries of relativity, >this book may be for you. And this reviewer might add that although >Bethell might not know it yet, this may be his most significant book. >===================================================== > >Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity >Theories by Al Kelly > >review... >Al Kelly is right, July 3, 2009 By Alvin D. Heindel "another patent >examiner" (USA) - See all my reviews > > >This review is from: Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's >Relativity Theories (Paperback) >Al Kelly should be commended for his courage in standing up to the >Einsteinian science mafia. The twin paradox proves Einsteinian relativity >is impossible. Einstein's theories should be called absolutivity which is >another logical contradiction. It was created when scientists believed in >the steady state theory of the universe. Now that scientists accept Hubble's >big bang theory and the fact that the earth's velocity has been measured >relative to the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the >big bang, it shows you can measure an absolute velocity based on Einstein's >theories. Also, scientists believe there's nothing outside the event horizon >around our universe. This provides us with another means for measuring a >velocity relative to a point in space which is an absolute velocity based >on Einstein's theories. Obviously, space and aether are infinite and gravity >is an aether density gradient, not curved space. Kelly doesn't mention >G. BURNISTON BROWN's discussion of the twin paradox in the Bulletin of >the Institute of Physics and Physical Society, Vol. 18 (March, 1967) pp. >71--77, easily found on the internet. He provides another good >anti-Einstein argument based on the twin paradox. I tend to think H. A. >Lorentz's theory might be the best one. Also, Einstein insisted relativity >depends on the existence of the aether which is denied by the physics >establishment. SRT depends on the existence of the aether, the same way >Newtonian relativity depends on the existence of space. In Lorentz's >theory, the aether is NOT at absolute rest. A. J. Kox gives a translation >of one paragraph from one of Lorentz's articles: 37 It should be emphasized >that LORENTZ did not adhere to the idea of absolute space. In LORENTZ (1895) >(sect. 2), for instance, he states that it is meaningless to talk about >absolute rest of the ether and that the expression 'the ether is at rest' >only means that the different parts of the ether do not move with respect to >each other (AHESc-1988 pages 67-78). >This is given as a reference: >1895 Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in >bewegten K�rpern (Leiden: Brill, 1895); repr. in CP, Vol. 5, pp. 1-138. >The 1906 reprint can be downloaded from Google books. > >======================================================== > >Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist by Christopher Jon >Bjerknes (Paperback - July 2002) > >====================================== > >Einstein's Riddle: Riddles, Paradoxes, and Conundrums to Stretch >Your Mind by Jeremy Stangroom (Hardcover - Apr. 28, 2009) > >================================================= > >Reinventing Gravity: A Physicist Goes Beyond Einstein >by John W. Moffat (Hardcover - Sept. 30, 2008) > >==================================== > >What Einstein Did Not See: Redefining Time to Understand >Space by Thomas W. Sills (Paperback - June 1, 2009) > >============================================= > >Einstein's Greatest Blunder?: The Cosmological Constant and >Other Fudge Factors in the Physics of the Universe >(Questions of Science) by Donald Goldsmith (Paperback - Oct. 15, 1997) > >============================================= > >Dialog About Objections Against the Theory of Relativity >by Albert Einstein (Paperback - Nov. 12, 2009) > >============================================================ > >The Quantum Theory of Planck, Einstein, Bohr and >Sommerfeld: Its Foundation and the Rise of Its Difficulties >1900-1925 1 (The Historical Development of ... and the >Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925) >by Jagdish Mehra and H. Rechenberg (Paperback - Dec. 28, 2000) > >====================================== > >The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers: A Counter-Revolution in >Physics by Dean Turner; Richard Hazelett (Paperback - Oct. 1, 2005) > >========================================================== > >Einstein on Trial or Metaphysical Principles of Natural >Philosophy by Jorge Cespedes-Cure (Paperback - July 1, 2002) > >======================================================= > >Einstein as Myth and Muse by Alan J. Friedman and >Carol C. Donley (Paperback - Apr. 28, 1989) > >======================================== > > Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory >Of Relativity (Paperback) >~ Kamen George Kamenov (Author), Kamen G. Kamenov (Illustrator > > 1 of 2 people found the following review helpful: > A classic book.!!!, December 4, 2008 By Peter Stone (USA) - See all >my reviews > >This review is from: Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of >Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) >In 1972 the famous British professor Herbert Dingle, >an ex-relativist who turned into antirelativist, published >a book against relativity titled: Science at the crossroads. >Because of that he was gradually removed from the "scientiffic" >establishment. Kamen Kamenov's book is one of the books, alongside >those of Herbert Dingle, Harald Nordenson and Henri Bergson, >highly recommendable to those who really want to understand how >incurably flawed and useless the "theory" in question is and >why it should be abandoned in its entirety. Some books are hard >to find. Look in "bookfinder.com" and read about the above >mentionned autors in Wikipedia. > > 7 of 12 people found the following review helpful: > A revolutionary new book !, May 30, 2001 By >Robert (Berkeley,California) - See all my reviews > >This review is from: Space, Time and Matter, and the Falsity of >Einstein's Theory of Relativity (Paperback) >Provocative and fascinating. Mr. Kamenov provides the clearest >possible nonmathematical explanation of the present day understanding >of the theory of relativity and then unmistakably disproves it. His >logic is undeniable . I think that after reading the book nobody >can believe in the validity of the theory of relatvity any longer >but quite the opposite is true,the theory is wrong. Mr. Kamenov >explains in plain langauge the real nature of relity and offers >alternative solution to the theory of relativity. He proves >the existence of ether. The book deals not only with theory of >relativity but also with the philosophy of space, time and physical >matter and explains in a plain , nonmathematical way the nature >of electricity , magnetism and gravitation. This book is realy >easy to understand but it requires an abstract thinking . It >is a great exercise for the mind and Mr. Kamenov is a great mind. >I read the book several times and every time it was even more >interesting. I could not stop reading it. I believe that this >book will revolutionize the modern science. It is a real treasure. > >============================= > >Einstein, the Aether & Variable Rest Mass (Paperback) >~ Jack Heighway (Author) > >================================= > >Einstein's Relativity Theory: Correct, Paradoxical, and Wrong >by Lyubomir, T. Gruyitch (Hardcover - Dec. 6, 2006) > >////////////////////////////////////////////////// >///////////////////////////////////// > > > >--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net --- hahaha, hanson digging in his garbage bin. Ya know hanson, that all those anti-books are garbage, do you. If you have something to say, write a formula. Else write another anti-Einstein pamphlet. w.
From: Helmut Wabnig hwabnig on 1 Jun 2010 09:16 On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:01:22 -0400, "Me, ...again!" <arthures(a)mv.com> wrote: > > >On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, it was written: > >> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 01:30:35 -0700, "hanson" <hanson(a)quick.net> wrote: >> >>> "Einstein was right?" yields 148,000 Google hits, posted by >>> disciples of Einstein's cult, known as Einstein Dingleberries. >>>> >>> When googling for "Einstein was wrong, stupid, a plagiarist, fraud, >>> liar, thief, nitwit, fool & idiot" in 9 individual Google searches with >>> the above attributes (all of which appeared in sci.physics) then the >>> accumultated sum shows 5'165'800 Google hits... ahahahAHAHA >>>> >>> One can argue about this anyway one wishes, but the hand writing >>> is on the wall. --- Einstein's con has run its course. His 15 minutes >>> are up... ... "You can fool all the people some of the time, and >>> some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people >>> all the time. -- by Abraham Lincoln. >>>> >>> Albert's Dingleberries will moan, groan & howl over this... ahahaha >>> Details of this trend is shown below in Arthur's post who wrote: >>>> >>> "Me, ...again!" <arthures(a)mv.com> wrote in message >>> news:Pine.BSF.4.61.1005250817140.61930(a)osmium.mv.net... >>> >>> Was Einstein right or wrong? >>> >>> What we have are two schools of thought: >>> i) Einstein did something, vs. >>> ii) a bunch of experts/skeptics who think Einstein made a lot of noise, >>> more heat than light, and fooled a lot of people. >>> >>> Here, below, are many more books which cast much doubt on >>> Einstein's "contributions"...... >>> >>> (all dug up by searches on Amazon.com under: au=einstein) >>> >>> Note that most of these books were written in the last decade or two. If >>> we do a search going back to the beginnings of SR, GR, then I'm sure >>> there will be found many many dozens of books written by equally smart >>> people who challenge and/or do not accept Einstein. >>> >>> I think it would be foolish to think the story is over, final, and >>> finished. >>> >>> //////////////////////////////////////// >>> >>> Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius [Paperback] >>> Hans C. Ohanian (Author) >>> >>> ================================ >>> >>> Einstein's Greatest Mistake: Abandonment of the Aether >>> by Sid Deutsch >>> >>> ================================================== >>> >>> Questioning Einstein: Is Relativity Necessary? >>> by, Tom Bethell >>> >>> Review.... >>> That a book by a great and established writer like Tom Bethell, >>> who is a long-time science writer and political columnist at The >>> American Spectator, hasn't been officially reviewed yet, says >>> more about those who pose as the intellectual and editorial >>> guardians of literature than it does about the quality of this >>> book or the stature of its author. In fact, it is an engaging, >>> well researched book about one of the most interesting paradigm >>> struggles of the twentieth century (and still ongoing today). >>> That Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (SR) was influenced >>> by and made quickly popular by the relativistic ideologies of >>> its time (1905) seems to this writer a foregone conclusion. >>> But it was the Michelson-Morley experiment that failed to >>> detect a "luminiferous ether," which gave SR scientific credibility. >>> But Michelson himself soon doubted its conclusions and proved it in >>> the later Michelson-Gale experiment which did detect an ether. >>> >>> H. Lorentz, a contemporary of Einstein, and a scientist of equal >>> stature, argued in numerous debates with Einstein that all >>> "relativistic effects" (such as the bending of starlight as it >>> passes near the sun) were the result of light traveling through >>> an "entrained ether" which surrounds and moves with planetary >>> bodies--otherwise known as the gravitational field. Other >>> well-known physicists of the day also doubted the veracity of >>> SR, especially its principle of space-time distortion. A few >>> were: Herbert Dingle, whose "paradox" asked the question of >>> which "clock" would run slow (and thus experience time dilation >>> predicted by SR) of two relativistic travelers; as for example two >>> rocket ships in different inertial frames (i.e., going at different >>> speeds relative to each other). Another physicist, H. Ives, of the >>> famous Ives-Stillwell experiment to test the Doppler effect of >>> fast moving mesons, became a lifelong enemy of Einstein because >>> he felt that his results were being misinterpreted. And there were >>> many others who disagreed with Einstein's fundamental conclusions. >>> >>> Even Einstein himself, as Bethell points out, later in life admitted >>> that forces propagating through empty space without a medium in >>> which they could be conveyed, was a logical absurdity--a fact never >>> mentioned in textbooks, or in other "easy Einstein" books. In the >>> later part of the twentieth century, other scientific critics picked >>> up where Lorentz and his contemporaries had left off. Among them were >>> Tom Van Flandern, Carver Mead, and Petr Beckmann. Bethell concentrates >>> on Beckmann's critique, written in a technical book called Einstein >>> Plus Two, in which the author claims that all the effects of both >>> Special and General Relativity can be explained using classical >>> physics. Bethell brings Beckmann's book down to earth from the arcane >>> heights of Mt. Olympus by rendering Beckmann's mathematical descriptions >>> understandable to the layman. >>> >>> If you are interested in the history of one of the most pivotal scientific >>> ideas of our time, if you have always believed that the world should >>> make sense but would still like to know about the mysteries of relativity, >>> this book may be for you. And this reviewer might add that although >>> Bethell might not know it yet, this may be his most significant book. >>> ===================================================== >>> >>> Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity >>> Theories by Al Kelly >>> >>> review... >>> Al Kelly is right, July 3, 2009 By Alvin D. Heindel "another patent >>> examiner" (USA) - See all my reviews >>> >>> >>> This review is from: Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's >>> Relativity Theories (Paperback) >>> Al Kelly should be commended for his courage in standing up to the >>> Einsteinian science mafia. The twin paradox proves Einsteinian relativity >>> is impossible. Einstein's theories should be called absolutivity which is >>> another logical contradiction. It was created when scientists believed in >>> the steady state theory of the universe. Now that scientists accept Hubble's >>> big bang theory and the fact that the earth's velocity has been measured >>> relative to the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the >>> big bang, it shows you can measure an absolute velocity based on Einstein's >>> theories. Also, scientists believe there's nothing outside the event horizon >>> around our universe. This provides us with another means for measuring a >>> velocity relative to a point in space which is an absolute velocity based >>> on Einstein's theories. Obviously, space and aether are infinite and gravity >>> is an aether density gradient, not curved space. Kelly doesn't mention >>> G. BURNISTON BROWN's discussion of the twin paradox in the Bulletin of >>> the Institute of Physics and Physical Society, Vol. 18 (March, 1967) pp. >>> 71--77, easily found on the internet. He provides another good >>> anti-Einstein argument based on the twin paradox. I tend to think H. A. >>> Lorentz's theory might be the best one. Also, Einstein insisted relativity >>> depends on the existence of the aether which is denied by the physics >>> establishment. SRT depends on the existence of the aether, the same way >>> Newtonian relativity depends on the existence of space. In Lorentz's >>> theory, the aether is NOT at absolute rest. A. J. Kox gives a translation >>> of one paragraph from one of Lorentz's articles: 37 It should be emphasized >>> that LORENTZ did not adhere to the idea of absolute space. In LORENTZ (1895) >>> (sect. 2), for instance, he states that it is meaningless to talk about >>> absolute rest of the ether and that the expression 'the ether is at rest' >>> only means that the different parts of the ether do not move with respect to >>> each other (AHESc-1988 pages 67-78). >>> This is given as a reference: >>> 1895 Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in >>> bewegten K�rpern (Leiden: Brill, 1895); repr. in CP, Vol. 5, pp. 1-138. >>> The 1906 reprint can be downloaded from Google books. >>> >>> ======================================================== >>> >>> Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist by Christopher Jon >>> Bjerknes (Paperback - July 2002) >>> >>> ====================================== >>> >>> Einstein's Riddle: Riddles, Paradoxes, and Conundrums to Stretch >>> Your Mind by Jeremy Stangroom (Hardcover - Apr. 28, 2009) >>> >>> ================================================= >>> >>> Reinventing Gravity: A Physicist Goes Beyond Einstein >>> by John W. Moffat (Hardcover - Sept. 30, 2008) >>> >>> ==================================== >>> >>> What Einstein Did Not See: Redefining Time to Understand >>> Space by Thomas W. Sills (Paperback - June 1, 2009) >>> >>> ============================================= >>> >>> Einstein's Greatest Blunder?: The Cosmological Constant and >>> Other Fudge Factors in the Physics of the Universe >>> (Questions of Science) by Donald Goldsmith (Paperback - Oct. 15, 1997) >>> >>> ============================================= >>> >>> Dialog About Objections Against the Theory of Relativity >>> by Albert Einstein (Paperback - Nov. 12, 2009) >>> >>> ============================================================ >>> >>> The Quantum Theory of Planck, Einstein, Bohr and >>> Sommerfeld: Its Foundation and the Rise of Its Difficulties >>> 1900-1925 1 (The Historical Development of ... and the >>> Rise of Its Difficulties 1900-1925) >>> by Jagdish Mehra and H. Rechenberg (Paperback - Dec. 28, 2000) >>> >>> ====================================== >>> >>> The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers: A Counter-Revolution in >>> Physics by Dean Turner; Richard Hazelett (Paperback - Oct. 1, 2005) >>> >>> ========================================================== >>> >>> Einstein on Trial or Metaphysical Principles of Natural >>> Philosophy by Jorge Cespedes-Cure (Paperback - July 1, 2002) >>> >>> ======================================================= >>> >>> Einstein as Myth and Muse by Alan J. Friedman and >>> Carol C. Donley (Paperback - Apr. 28, 1989) >>> >>> ======================================== >>> >>> Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of Einstein's Theory >>> Of Relativity (Paperback) >>> ~ Kamen George Kamenov (Author), Kamen G. Kamenov (Illustrator >>> >>> 1 of 2 people found the following review helpful: >>> A classic book.!!!, December 4, 2008 By Peter Stone (USA) - See all >>> my reviews >>> >>> This review is from: Space, Time, And Matter And The Falsity of >>> Einstein's Theory Of Relativity (Paperback) >>> In 1972 the famous British professor Herbert Dingle, >>> an ex-relativist who turned into antirelativist, published >>> a book against relativity titled: Science at the crossroads. >>> Because of that he was gradually removed from the "scientiffic" >>> establishment. Kamen Kamenov's book is one of the books, alongside >>> those of Herbert Dingle, Harald Nordenson and Henri Bergson, >>> highly recommendable to those who really want to understand how >>> incurably flawed and useless the "theory" in question is and >>> why it should be abandoned in its entirety. Some books are hard >>> to find. Look in "bookfinder.com" and read about the above >>> mentionned autors in Wikipedia. >>> >>> 7 of 12 people found the following review helpful: >>> A revolutionary new book !, May 30, 2001 By >>> Robert (Berkeley,California) - See all my reviews >>> >>> This review is from: Space, Time and Matter, and the Falsity of >>> Einstein's Theory of Relativity (Paperback) >>> Provocative and fascinating. Mr. Kamenov provides the clearest >>> possible nonmathematical explanation of the present day understanding >>> of the theory of relativity and then unmistakably disproves it. His >>> logic is undeniable . I think that after reading the book nobody >>> can believe in the validity of the theory of relatvity any longer >>> but quite the opposite is true,the theory is wrong. Mr. Kamenov >>> explains in plain langauge the real nature of relity and offers >>> alternative solution to the theory of relativity. He proves >>> the existence of ether. The book deals not only with theory of >>> relativity but also with the philosophy of space, time and physical >>> matter and explains in a plain , nonmathematical way the nature >>> of electricity , magnetism and gravitation. This book is realy >>> easy to understand but it requires an abstract thinking . It >>> is a great exercise for the mind and Mr. Kamenov is a great mind. >>> I read the book several times and every time it was even more >>> interesting. I could not stop reading it. I believe that this >>> book will revolutionize the modern science. It is a real treasure. >>> >>> ============================= >>> >>> Einstein, the Aether & Variable Rest Mass (Paperback) >>> ~ Jack Heighway (Author) >>> >>> ================================= >>> >>> Einstein's Relativity Theory: Correct, Paradoxical, and Wrong >>> by Lyubomir, T. Gruyitch (Hardcover - Dec. 6, 2006) >>> >>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////// >>> ///////////////////////////////////// >>> >>> >>> >>> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net --- >> >> >> hahaha, hanson digging in his garbage bin. >> >> Ya know hanson, that all those anti-books are garbage, do you. >> >> If you have something to say, write a formula. >> Else write another anti-Einstein pamphlet. >> >> >> w. >> > >You can hold a particular religious belief by assuming that all other >religious beliefs are absolutely incorrect..... > >or... > >You can say you prefer one particular religious belief (for reasons X,Y,Z) >but remember that there are other people who _prefer_ a different >religious belief (and remember that they _prefer_ theirs for reasons >A,B,C, and D)..... > >and you all can try to coexist without nuclear war between you. > Hehe, come on, come on, what is your nick on Battlefield Bad Company 2 and what server are you on.....I will get ya! w.
From: PD on 1 Jun 2010 13:33 On Jun 1, 3:30 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > "Einstein was right?" yields 148,000 Google hits, posted by > disciples of Einstein's cult, known as Einstein Dingleberries. > > When googling for "Einstein was wrong, stupid, a plagiarist, fraud, > liar, thief, nitwit, fool & idiot" in 9 individual Google searches with > the above attributes (all of which appeared in sci.physics) then the > accumultated sum shows 5'165'800 Google hits... ahahahAHAHA "Cold fusion progress" - 780,000 hits "Cold fusion fraud" - 190,000 hits By hanson's Google-consensus method, cold fusion is a viable technology. > > One can argue about this anyway one wishes, but the hand writing > is on the wall. --- Einstein's con has run its course. His 15 minutes > are up... ... "You can fool all the people some of the time, and > some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people > all the time. -- by Abraham Lincoln. > Then I suppose we won't be hearing any more about him from you, lest you perpetuate his course. PD
From: Peter Webb on 1 Jun 2010 22:15
I gather from the context that you believe that Einstein's Special and General Theory of Relativity are wrong. What do you think of Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect (which was instrumental in thedevelopment of Quantum Mechanics, and for which he earned a Nobel prize), and Einstein's modelling of Brownian motion (which virtually created the whole field of statistical mechanics) ? Was he wrong about them as well? |