From: ilario.mazzei on
Using the binomial serier (+1-1)^n i was able to extend the order of derivation to complex numbers. Please read the article on my site (http://researchpages.my-host.org/home/) and post here comments.
Thanks

Ilario M.
From: Dave L. Renfro on
Ilario M. wrote:

> Using the binomial serier (+1-1)^n i was able to extend the
> order of derivation to complex numbers. Please read the article
> on my site (http://researchpages.my-host.org/home/) and post
> here comments.

You might get more interest if you explain how your idea
relates to the similar well known notion in what's called
"fractional calculus", which has its roots way back with
Leibnitz (1690's) and which was extensively explored by
Liouville in the 1800's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FractionalDerivative.html

Dave L. Renfro
From: Ilario980 on
Thanks for the post professor Renfro.


Ilario M.
From: Ilario980 on
As professor Renfro suggested to me, I've found a sketch of proof that shows the equivalence between fractional integral/derivative operator and operator I've found; please post yours comments about this proof (http://researchpages.my-host.org/home/).
Thanks

Ilario M.
From: alainverghote on
On 1 juil, 21:09, Ilario980 <ilario.maz...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> As professor Renfro suggested to me, I've found a sketch of proof that shows the equivalence between fractional integral/derivative operator and operator I've found; please post yours comments about this proof (http://researchpages.my-host.org/home/).  
> Thanks  
>
> Ilario M.

Bonjour Ilario,

This matter has been often seen and discussed
on this site .

EX: with given conventions we may write things such as
f(x,y) = (d/dy)^[ln(x)/ln(2)] o exp(2y)

Alain