Prev: Extension of order of derivation
Next: electric charge is likely to be more accurately that of 1.618.. x 10^-19 C; magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #188; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 21 Jun 2010 15:25


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> (snipped)
> >
> > Let me try to explain what I mean with the theory of light. We all
> > know that light has a speed
> > designated as "c" of which it is travelling in a vaccuum. But is there
> > a perfect vaccuum? Is there a
> > vaccuum at all? Probably not. And is not the Universe an elliptic
> > geometry meaning it has
> > a curvature and thus any light travelling in curved space is not going
> > to speed at "c". And so there is no light, ever, travelling at "c"
> > itself. So if all light is travelling at less than "c" does it mean
> > that the physics of light is wrong? No. It simply means
> > that light has a upper bound, an upper limit. Another place in physics
> > where we meet such
> > a condition is the absolute zero temperature. Nothing in the Cosmos is
> > 0 Kelvin, but that does
> > not mean 0 Kelvin is nonexistant. It only means 0 Kelvin exists but is
> > an upper limit.
> >
>
> In sci.math, recently I outlined how we derive the speed of light
> purely out of math
> without ever doing experimental measurement. Let me recap that
> procedure. We are
> given a sphere surface, or it could be a elliptical surface. And we
> make the lines of
> longitude as bands rather than lines. So to use Earth as an example,
> and to use the
> speed of light in meters per second, the bands that are the lines of
> longitude are
> a meter thick bands. Then we use a logarithmic spiral for the time
> coordinate. So the
> speed of light is the full coverage of a light ray that races through
> all the longitude bands
> and the length of the logarthmic spiral is the time factor (keep in
> mind that only a 1/3,
> if memory serves me, of the
> log spiral from pole to pole is used due to geometry). So it matters
> none whether
> the speed of light is in meters a second or in miles per hour because
> the bands are compensated for different units.
>
> Now the speed of light as most experiments reveal is approx 2.99... x
> 10^8 m/sec
> or 3 x 10^8 m/sec.
>
> But the reasoning for this post is that those figures are probably,
> highly inaccurate, even
> though they are touted as super accurate.
> The reason I say this is because in my prior post, I said that there
> is no actual physics
> vacuum and all measurements of the speed of light were committed in
> nonvacuum conditions.
> Even space is highly occupied, even in the voids space there is no
> vacuum to be found.
> And another feature of Space is that it is highly curved or bent since
> it is not Euclidean geometry. So any measurement of light speed is
> going to be a slower speed than what
> "c" actually is, due to no vacuum and bent space.
>
> My hunch is that the speed of light is probably 3.14159.. x 10^8 m/
> sec. In other words, the
> speed of light in vacuum in Euclidean geometry is the digits of pi.
>
> Now there is a nice test of this conjecture. Simply see if the
> construct I proposed above:
>
> distance of bands of longitudes/logarithmic spiral one third from pole
> to pole
>
> to see if that formula is in fact the digits of pi in mathematics. No
> matter what the size
> of the sphere is, we divide the band distance by 1/3 log spiral
> distance and end up with a
> number that is the digits of pi.
>
> Now this monopole idea by Dirac makes me want to explore whether the
> electric charge:
>
> 1.60 x 10^-19 C is also able to be assertained purely from mathematics
> without ever doing
> a physics experiment. I think so. More in next post.
>

One of the problems with having so many irons in the fire, is that I
do not remember
so well where I left off previously. So I had to refresh my memory
with these two posts:




#######
sci.math, sci.physics, sci.logic
Jan 28, 1:00 am
Date: Jan 28, 2010 2:00 AM
Author: plutonium.archimedes(a)gmail.com
Subject: help on geometry problem #356; Correcting Math


Enrico wrote:

(snipped)


> Convex: The dual of the concave situation above:
> A circle centered on the triangle ABC and passing through points A,
B,
> and C.


> Disclaimer - I don't think this works if the surface area of the
> equilateral
> triangle is greater than or equal to 1/8 of the surface area of
the
> sphere.


> The task of converting all this into numbers is not one I care to have
> to
> learn how to do before producing a result. I don't have the time
or
> interest.


>                                                              Enrico

Thanks a million, Enrico. You have stated the problem far better than
what I have stated the problem.



#######

sci.math, sci.physics, sci.logic
Apr 14, 3:13 pm
Date: Apr 14, 2010 4:13 PM
Author: plutonium.archimedes(a)gmail.com
Subject: deriving the speed of light, purely out of math #599
Correcting Math

I wrote:
(snipped)

Now let me give an example of how a math book should treat a subject
matter.
Earlier I wrote how the speed of light in physics should be derived
out of pure math
as that of Stripe Geometry on the surface of Earth where I take all
the meridians
as stripes and where the circumference of Earth is 40,000 km so all
the stripes are
1 km wide and all of meridians would be 40,000 x 40,000 and the
stripe
that represents
the Log-spiral would be 5,000, thus yielding a speed of light of 3 x
10^5 km/sec.

######

Today is June 21, 2010, and for some reason, the log spiral
representative of
the meridians is only 1/8 of the meridian distance.

So I have in the above 40,000 x 40,000/ 5,000 = 300,000 km/sec

So I derive the speed of light purely out of mathematical geometry as
that of
the meridians versus the log spiral on any sphere surface, and
independent of
any units of measure as the bands or stripes removes the units.

This is what should happen in an Atom Totality, that the most
important numbers
of physics come from the fact the Cosmos is an Atom Totality. Such as
pi is
the number of subshells 22 of s,p,d,f subshells divided by the number
of shells
of 7; and "e" is the number of occupied subshells 19/7. So the speed
of light is the
number of band meridians divided by the representative log-spiral.

Now I should be able to derive from pure math, the electric charge of
1.6 x 10^-19 C.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Extension of order of derivation
Next: electric charge is likely to be more accurately that of 1.618.. x 10^-19 C; magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #188; ATOM TOTALITY