FAQ Topic - What are object models? (2010-03-21)
in [JavaScript]
|
Prev: [ANN] Call for Papers for 2010 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming
Next: FAQ Topic - Internationalisation and Multinationalisation in javascript. (2010-03-23)
From: David Mark on 25 May 2010 13:57 Scott Sauyet wrote: > David Mark wrote: >> Scott Sauyet wrote: >>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>> Garrett Smith wrote: >>>>> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, >>>> Wrong. [ ... ] >>> Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm >>> just curious. >> What's even more curious is why you would respond to the response in >> this fashion. JFTR, your curiosity is OT here and Usenet posts don't >> have expiration dates. > > Stranger still that you would bother to respond to my response to his > response... > Not really. Somebody has to point out mistakes, else they are sure to be repeated.
From: Scott Sauyet on 25 May 2010 14:02 David Mark wrote: > Scott Sauyet wrote: >> David Mark wrote: >>> Scott Sauyet wrote: >>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>>> Garrett Smith wrote: >>>>>> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, >>>>> Wrong. [ ... ] >>>> Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm >>>> just curious. >>> What's even more curious is why you would respond to the response in >>> this fashion. JFTR, your curiosity is OT here and Usenet posts don't >>> have expiration dates. > >> Stranger still that you would bother to respond to my response to his >> response... > > Not really. Somebody has to point out mistakes, else they are sure to > be repeated. Somebody has to point out mistakes, else they are sure to be repeated. -- Scott
From: David Mark on 25 May 2010 14:45 Scott Sauyet wrote: > David Mark wrote: >> Scott Sauyet wrote: >>> David Mark wrote: >>>> Scott Sauyet wrote: >>>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>>>> Garrett Smith wrote: >>>>>>> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, >>>>>> Wrong. [ ... ] >>>>> Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm >>>>> just curious. >>>> What's even more curious is why you would respond to the response in >>>> this fashion. JFTR, your curiosity is OT here and Usenet posts don't >>>> have expiration dates. >>> Stranger still that you would bother to respond to my response to his >>> response... >> Not really. Somebody has to point out mistakes, else they are sure to >> be repeated. > > Somebody has to point out mistakes, else they are sure to be repeated. > But Thomas didn't make a mistake. See my first response to you. HTH.
From: Dr J R Stockton on 25 May 2010 15:42 In comp.lang.javascript message <628376ed-bd73-471d-9df4-ce430db37019(a)e2 8g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>, Tue, 25 May 2010 06:18:14, Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet(a)gmail.com> posted: >Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Garrett Smith wrote: >>> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, >> >> Wrong. [ ... ] > >Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm >just curious. He is psychologically abnormal; and also lacks the courtesy to provide helpful Attribution information. -- (c) John Stockton, nr London UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links. Proper <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line exactly "-- " (RFCs 5536/7) Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (RFCs 5536/7)
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 27 May 2010 06:12
John G Harris wrote: > Scott Sauyet wrote: >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> Garrett Smith wrote: >>>> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, >>> Wrong. [ ... ] >> Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm >> just curious. > > He's feeling grumpy and has scanned back through the records looking for > something to be grumpy about. Guess again. PointedEars -- Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee |