FAQ Topic - What are object models? (2010-03-21)
in [JavaScript]
|
Prev: [ANN] Call for Papers for 2010 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming
Next: FAQ Topic - Internationalisation and Multinationalisation in javascript. (2010-03-23)
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 25 May 2010 06:33 Garrett Smith wrote: > | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, Wrong. | 4.3.8 | host object | | object supplied by the host environment to complete the execution | environment of ECMAScript. | | NOTE | Any object that is not native is a host object. > Thoughts and suggestions? You are not paying attention. The above statement has already been disproved (by me). PointedEars -- var bugRiddenCrashPronePieceOfJunk = ( navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE 5') != -1 && navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mac') != -1 ) // Plone, register_function.js:16
From: Scott Sauyet on 25 May 2010 09:18 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Garrett Smith wrote: >> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, > > Wrong. [ ... ] Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm just curious. -- Scott
From: David Mark on 25 May 2010 09:24 Scott Sauyet wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Garrett Smith wrote: >>> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, >> Wrong. [ ... ] > > Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm > just curious. > What's even more curious is why you would respond to the response in this fashion. JFTR, your curiosity is OT here and Usenet posts don't have expiration dates. HTH.
From: John G Harris on 25 May 2010 10:41 On Tue, 25 May 2010 at 06:18:14, in comp.lang.javascript, Scott Sauyet wrote: >Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Garrett Smith wrote: >>> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, >> >> Wrong. [ ... ] > >Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm >just curious. He's feeling grumpy and has scanned back through the records looking for something to be grumpy about. John -- John Harris
From: Scott Sauyet on 25 May 2010 11:21
David Mark wrote: > Scott Sauyet wrote: >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> Garrett Smith wrote: >>>> | A host object may be implemented as a native ECMAScript object, >>> Wrong. [ ... ] > >> Why do you choose to respond now to a post nearly two months old? I'm >> just curious. > > What's even more curious is why you would respond to the response in > this fashion. JFTR, your curiosity is OT here and Usenet posts don't > have expiration dates. Stranger still that you would bother to respond to my response to his response... ;-) -- Scott |