From: Robert L. Oldershaw on
On May 2, 9:46 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
<nowh...(a)canonicalscience.com> wrote:

---------------------------

Many thanks to all for the encouragement.

Best,
RLO
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
From: bz on
"Robert L. Oldershaw" <rloldershaw(a)amherst.edu> wrote in news:cfda1f99-
0cb5-4ed9-9f14-6ce4d6482ddb(a)i10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:


.....
> Perhaps there is just no real interest in science here?
>
> Thoughts welcome.
>
> RLO

Why don't you just put it on your web site and post a link to the
histogram?

Then people don't NEED to e-mail you and expose their e-mail address to
possible spam etc.

--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
From: leucipo2001 on
On 1 mayo, 18:40, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
> On Apr 29, 3:01 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
> wrote:> Mass range 100 MeV - 1860 MeV
>
> > Bin Heights reflect particle widths, i.e., their stability
>
> > Experimental spectrum is compared with expectation values derived from
> > M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass).
>
> > My graphics skills are a bit weak, but the results are definitely
> > worth a look.
>
> > TO GET A FREE COPY, SEND ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL ATTACH A PDF TO THE
> > REPLY.
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> I am somewhat in disbelief that no one is interested in seeing the
> subatomic particle mass spectrum displayed in a way that may have
> never been done before.  And for free!

stability against mass? :-DDDDDDDDD

http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/09/14/a-mistery-behind-the-z-width/

http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/nonstrong.jpg

–download mass_width_2006.csv from
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2006/html/computer_read.html
–go to the download directory and invoke

gnuplot

–in gnuplot do the following

set datafile commentschars “*”
set datafile separator “,”
set logscale xy
set key bottom Right
plot “mass_width_2006.csv” using 1:4




> Does the term histogram scare people away?



yes when it is wrongly used


> Are people worried about the fact that they would have to send me an
> email that I could reply to?  Would that be too much effort?

> Perhaps there is just no real interest in science here?

you have some point here.



From: leucipo2001 on
On 3 mayo, 17:41, bz <bz+...(a)ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu> wrote:
> "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu> wrote in news:cfda1f99-

>
> Why don't you just put it on your web site and post a link to the
> histogram?

+1
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on
On May 5, 8:11 pm, leucipo2001 <al.riv...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> stability against mass? :-DDDDDDDDD
>
---------------------------

Have you seen a copy of the graph, and the explanation of it, and the
derivation of the mass equation?

RLO
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw