Prev: Online survey jobs & data entry jobs
Next: Why is the square of the universal speed limit the amount of energy?
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 1 May 2010 12:40
On Apr 29, 3:01 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
> Mass range 100 MeV - 1860 MeV
>
> Bin Heights reflect particle widths, i.e., their stability
>
> Experimental spectrum is compared with expectation values derived from
> M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass).
>
> My graphics skills are a bit weak, but the results are definitely
> worth a look.
>
> TO GET A FREE COPY, SEND ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL ATTACH A PDF TO THE
> REPLY.
--------------------------------------

I am somewhat in disbelief that no one is interested in seeing the
subatomic particle mass spectrum displayed in a way that may have
never been done before. And for free!

Does the term histogram scare people away?

Are people worried about the fact that they would have to send me an
email that I could reply to? Would that be too much effort?

Perhaps there is just no real interest in science here?

Thoughts welcome.

RLO
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 1 May 2010 21:44
On May 1, 8:39 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Since you don't do physics at all, the question is irrelevant as is your
> numerology.
>
> Calculate the spectrum of the Hydrogen atom.
-------------------------------------

How about the singly-excited Helium spectrum for n = 7 to n =10?

This might surprise you: http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0510/0510147.pdf

The match between the two spectra cannot be attributed to chance or a
fortuitous choice of systems. Such argumnts would be profoundly
unscientific because they ignore the highly restricted specificity of
the comparison. I can explain that to you, if you need help.

Hope this helps to enlighten,
RLO
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw


From: eric gisse on 1 May 2010 23:55
Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:

> On May 1, 8:39 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Since you don't do physics at all, the question is irrelevant as is your
>> numerology.
>>
>> Calculate the spectrum of the Hydrogen atom.
> -------------------------------------
>
> How about the singly-excited Helium spectrum for n = 7 to n =10?
>
> This might surprise you:
> http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0510/0510147.pdf
>
> The match between the two spectra cannot be attributed to chance or a
> fortuitous choice of systems. Such argumnts would be profoundly
> unscientific because they ignore the highly restricted specificity of
> the comparison. I can explain that to you, if you need help.
>
> Hope this helps to enlighten,
> RLO
> www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw

Whoever allowed you to post to arXiv needs to be punched in the solar
plexus.
From: Jerry on 2 May 2010 09:07
On May 1, 11:40 am, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
> On Apr 29, 3:01 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
> wrote:> Mass range 100 MeV - 1860 MeV
>
> > Bin Heights reflect particle widths, i.e., their stability
>
> > Experimental spectrum is compared with expectation values derived from
> > M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass).
>
> > My graphics skills are a bit weak, but the results are definitely
> > worth a look.
>
> > TO GET A FREE COPY, SEND ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL ATTACH A PDF TO THE
> > REPLY.
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> I am somewhat in disbelief that no one is interested in seeing the
> subatomic particle mass spectrum displayed in a way that may have
> never been done before.  And for free!
>
> Does the term histogram scare people away?
>
> Are people worried about the fact that they would have to send me an
> email that I could reply to?  Would that be too much effort?
>
> Perhaps there is just no real interest in science here?
>
> Thoughts welcome.

It is totally obvious to anyone reading your arxiv paper that your
theory lacks the key element of "falsifiability":
http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0701/0701006.pdf

Ask yourself:

1) Is there -ANY- random mass between 1508 MeV and 2134 MeV that
cannot be fit by integer n to within 4.8 percent or better?

2) Is there -ANY- random mass between 2134 MeV and 3018 MeV that
cannot be fit by integer n to within 2.5 percent or better?

3) Is there -ANY- random mass between 3018 MeV and 4268 MeV that
cannot be fit by integer n to within 1.2 percent or better?

4) Is there -ANY- random mass between 584 MeV and 761 MeV that cannot
be fit by kn/4 to within 7.5 percent or better?


Given the above, is anyone to be impressed that the eta particle is
matched to 6.7%, the Lambda0 particle is matched to 4.7%, and the N is
matched to 4.8%???

The spacing of sqrt(n) guarantees that ANYTHING RANDOM MASS AT ALL
will match.

Jerry



From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez on 2 May 2010 09:46
Robert L. Oldershaw wrote on Sat, 01 May 2010 09:40:07 -0700:

> On Apr 29, 3:01 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
> wrote:
>> Mass range 100 MeV - 1860 MeV
>>
>> Bin Heights reflect particle widths, i.e., their stability
>>
>> Experimental spectrum is compared with expectation values derived from
>> M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass).
>>
>> My graphics skills are a bit weak, but the results are definitely worth
>> a look.
>>
>> TO GET A FREE COPY, SEND ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL ATTACH A PDF TO THE
>> REPLY.
> --------------------------------------
>
> I am somewhat in disbelief that no one is interested in seeing the
> subatomic particle mass spectrum displayed in a way that may have never
> been done before. And for free!
>
> Does the term histogram scare people away?
>
> Are people worried about the fact that they would have to send me an
> email that I could reply to? Would that be too much effort?
>
> Perhaps there is just no real interest in science here?
>
> Thoughts welcome.
>
> RLO

The real interest in your 'theory' is inversely proportional
to the number of times that you snip criticism to your 'theory'
to the power of n, where n is the number of times that you say that
the BH relation J=aM, easily found in textbooks, is invalid, because
you do not understand even what is J!

Regards.

--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/

BLOG:
http://www.canonicalscience.org/publications/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencetoday.html
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Online survey jobs & data entry jobs
Next: Why is the square of the universal speed limit the amount of energy?