Prev: galaxy superclusters as iron filing whiskers Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #114; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Your delirium speaks whispers of the insane;
From: guskz on 27 May 2010 13:13
Observing Universe's expansion from light waves, may contain important
error factors.

Considering Universe is homogeneous, it could be 80% to a 100%
probable that light waves receive interference the more distant they
come from....(traveling gas doesn't need a galaxy...demolished star
with no planets, or tiniest of asteroids (space dust) with
insufficient star light)

Let "A" be the average distance between two nearby galaxies, Let "D"
be the largest distance light has traveled from the furthest
supernova.

% probability of light receiving brightness interference in a
homogeneous universe ~ D/ A

Likewise analogy, if no black hole in our galaxy then no black hole in
all galaxies is wrong....thus this is also a factor in determining
probability of light interference over large travel distance.

No one is 100% positive on the effects of light on an expanding
Universe...Galilean vs Relativistic vs ... effects on brightness,
velocity, time, etc...

From: BURT on 27 May 2010 15:00
On May 27, 10:13 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Observing Universe's expansion from light waves, may contain important
> error factors.
>
> Considering Universe is homogeneous, it could be 80% to a 100%
> probable that light waves receive interference the more distant they
> come from....(traveling gas doesn't need a galaxy...demolished star
> with no planets, or tiniest of asteroids (space dust) with
> insufficient star light)
>
> Let "A" be the average distance between two nearby galaxies, Let "D"
> be the largest distance light has traveled from the furthest
> supernova.
>
> % probability of light receiving brightness interference in a
> homogeneous universe ~ D/ A
>
> Likewise analogy, if no black hole in our galaxy then no black hole in
> all galaxies is wrong....thus this is also a factor in determining
> probability of light interference over large travel distance.
>
> No one is 100% positive on the effects of light on an expanding
> Universe...Galilean vs Relativistic vs ... effects on brightness,
> velocity, time, etc...

If red shift doesn't give distance then we are out of luck.

Mitch Raemsch
From: eon on 27 May 2010 15:12
On May 27, 7:13 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Observing Universe's expansion from light waves, may contain important
> error factors.
>
> Considering Universe is homogeneous, it could be 80% to a 100%
> probable that light waves receive interference the more distant they

no, is 100% for sure

[rest of misconceptions mercifully snipped]
From: guskz on 27 May 2010 15:14
On May 27, 1:52 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
> "gu...(a)hotmail.com" wrote:
>
> > Observing Universe's expansion from light waves, may contain important
> > error factors.
>
> Write the maths or zip your stoooopid pie hole.
>
> > Considering Universe is homogeneous,
>
> Stars, black holes, galaxies, superclusters... the Big Bang.  No
> homgeneity.
>

Well Aunt Al beleive's the Universe aint expanding uniformly in all
directions.
Don't have the heart to tell her husband's been long dead either.

> > it could be 80% to a 100%
> > probable
>
> --
> Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/


From: guskz on 27 May 2010 15:22
On May 27, 3:00 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 27, 10:13 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Observing Universe's expansion from light waves, may contain important
> > error factors.
>
> > Considering Universe is homogeneous, it could be 80% to a 100%
> > probable that light waves receive interference the more distant they
> > come from....(traveling gas doesn't need a galaxy...demolished star
> > with no planets, or tiniest of asteroids (space dust) with
> > insufficient star light)
>
> > Let "A" be the average distance between two nearby galaxies, Let "D"
> > be the largest distance light has traveled from the furthest
> > supernova.
>
> > % probability of light receiving brightness interference in a
> > homogeneous universe ~ D/ A
>
> > Likewise analogy, if no black hole in our galaxy then no black hole in
> > all galaxies is wrong....thus this is also a factor in determining
> > probability of light interference over large travel distance.
>
> > No one is 100% positive on the effects of light on an expanding
> > Universe...Galilean vs Relativistic vs ... effects on brightness,
> > velocity, time, etc...
>
> If red shift doesn't give distance then we are out of luck.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

After redshift frequency, comes the microwave frequency...and since is
the CMBR is even in all directions, don't know if possibly specific
angles where the cmbr is slightly more intense then at an other angle.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: galaxy superclusters as iron filing whiskers Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #114; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Your delirium speaks whispers of the insane;