Prev: Honda City Gurgaon | Honda Dealers India
Next: Factors affecting Expansion measures
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 27 May 2010 12:02


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now take another look at this picture:
>
> http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearsc.html
>
> And divide that picture into four quadrants: with the 1st quadrant
> containing the Hercules supercluster and the Centaurus Supercluster.
> And define a notion of angle of slant with respect to the origin
> point.
> The angle of slant of these Hercules and Centaurus is about a 45
> degree
> positive slant.
>
> In the 2nd quadrant we have the Pavo-Indus supercluster and its angle
> of
> slant is about 45 degrees negative.
>
> In the 3rd quadrant we have the Columba supercluster with angle of
> slant
> of 45 degrees positive.
>
> In the 4th quadrant we have the Hydra supercluster and the Leo
> supercluster
> with angle of slant the same as the 2nd quadrant of 45 degrees
> negative.
>
> So can this pattern be a result of a Big Bang explosion? No, for it is
> too neat
> and too systematic and too finely tuned to be an explosion pattern.
> The pattern
> here is that of a Cosmic Magnetic Field, as I was describing those
> iron filings
> whiskers aligned with the magnet.
>
> Curiously the P-P supercluster looks out of place for it seems to be
> partly in the
> 2nd quadrant and partly in the 3rd. But I reckon that this is a result
> of the Hubble
> Law Doppler redshift applied to the P-P that is in error of its
> distance and perhaps
> the P-P is not one integral supercluster but rather two different
> superclusters spaced
> far apart from one another.

Now the reason I would like to combine a microscope with the view of
the
iron filings under a magnetic field is to see if I can obtain some
detail. Of course
I would need the iron filings to be as small as what the microscope
can
handle in magnification. So that the iron filings would be
microscopically small.
Because I wonder if the whiskers have alot of symmetry detail. Such as
the
question of whether the whiskers or filaments or tubes of filings are
circular
or elliptical or perhaps hexagonal in cross section of a whisker.

Now the galaxies are mostly plasma hydrogen ions. Those are magnetic
of
course. And all but the Perseus-Pisces P-P supercluster look like
magnetic
tubes or whiskers in my iron filing experiment in the above website.

http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearsc.html

So there is quite a difference between iron filings with magnets and
with that
of ionized hydrogen plasma and a Cosmic Magnetic Field. And here we
begin
to understand that we need the force of gravity to be so miniscule as
to be
10^40 weaker than the EM force. So that on a cosmic scale of forces in
action,
that the force of gravity is merely a "side effect, a tiny side
effect" of an
overall enormous force of EM. And this harps back to the Unification
of Forces
of Physics as all forces are merely forms of the EM force. So that in
physics
lexicon that "mass bends space and matter follows the bent curvature
of space"
of the defunct "General Relativity" is merely a hint that Space is EM
itself and
where matter follows the bent curvature of space is the weakest form
of the Coulomb
Force = gravity that is 10^40 weaker than the EM Coulomb force. So
that in the
Unification of forces, all forces are a Coulomb force and only differ
in Coulomb strength.

The very fact that galaxies form into superclusters as these long
filaments or strings
or tubes or whiskers of galaxies, is proof alone that Space is run and
governed by
EM. And not a Big Bang run by gravity.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Honda City Gurgaon | Honda Dealers India
Next: Factors affecting Expansion measures