Prev: Fancast compared to Hulu plus my not so quick look at a bunch of the Linux OS
Next: Music software for Linux
From: TJ on 28 Apr 2010 09:21 On 04/27/2010 02:43 PM, trigonometry1972(a)gmail.com | wrote: (snip) > Mandriva Linux 2010 did OK except the video > was apparently crippled and as was the provided > file search function though I suppose I could > have used another search program. > And it did see the freestanding HD. > But it had it's hand out for money and I suspect > that would enabled it to work on both points > just mentioned. I suspect your Mandriva installation wasn't fully set up. I use the Free 32-bit version of 2010.0 on a 64-bit capable Sempron system (2GB RAM), and I have no trouble whatsoever with Hulu. Same thing with a 32-bit Athlon XP system, with but 512MB of RAM. Both systems have nVidia video cards, which I suppose could make a difference. The Free version of Mandriva doesn't come with proprietary drivers and software, but they are easily available without cost from the online repositories. I run my Mandriva systems quite happily without spending a cent in cash. If you want to try Mandriva again, and have some specific questions about getting it going properly, try posting them to alt.os.linux.mandriva. (more snipping) > > I am still a newbie but that is my story > for your entertainment..................Trig We all had to start somewhere. TJ -- There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.
From: A Watcher on 29 Apr 2010 12:08
trigonometry1972(a)gmail.com | wrote: > This is a quick and dirty posting. > Fancast is apparently vastly more stable the Hulu > when playing video streams. Hulu stumbles > the at the advert "blocks". I can play thru > by restarting and sliding to a point around > were it stumbled (not fun as I have to guess > a bit were it crashed) but this is only works > part of the time and is a huge pain. > Apparently Hulu has some 'script' that gums > the works. It also flashes some warning > that doesn't stay up long enough to read. > > I'll add the Fox site works somewhat while > at least some of the other network sites > only seem to think Windows and Apple. > But then again what can one expect from > the empty suits at the old big three networks. > > I am using a AMD64 system with a 64 bit > version of Ubuntu 9.04. I am reluctant to > to upgrade as upgrade when I ran the 32 bit > version of Ubuntu caused problem to the > point of inactivating the Hulu video stream > and most others. Finally after one "upgrade" > the computer could no longer see the internet > connection. I was on some version 10 number > version of 32 bit Ubuntu. So I saved everything > on to the freestanding hard disk and then > experimented. Mint failed to see the internet > connection and the freestanding HD. > Mandriva Linux 2010 did OK except the video > was apparently crippled and as was the provided > file search function though I suppose I could > have used another search program. > And it did see the freestanding HD. > But it had it's hand out for money and I suspect > that would enabled it to work on both points > just mentioned. > I also tried Debian 9.0 which also had its > faults. There seemed to be fewer programs > in its software warehouse than Ubuntu. > So I came full circle to an aging 64 bit Ubuntu > 8.10 which I then upgraded on line as much as I > thought I dared. Then once I reach 9.04 > I limited the upgrading to just the bare > essentials. > > I am not sure if I want to upgrade to the > upcoming long term version of Ubuntu that is due > to come out. > > I am still a newbie but that is my story > for your entertainment..................Trig Mint is an easier way to go if you want Ubuntu without all of the hassles of installing extra stuff. Mint isn't perfect either, but I like it a lot better than Ubuntu. |