From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:38:32 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:

>On 2/5/2010 1:45 PM, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:25:28 -0800, John Larkin
>> <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:56:15 -0500, Phil Hobbs
>>> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz,< 50 pF) for an optical feedback gizmo.
>>>> I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued. Other
>>>> possibilities are:
>>>>
>>>> Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
>>>> Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
>>>> Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
>>>> Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec
>>>>
>>>> It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
>>>> (especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
>>>> currents (5-10 uA).
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Phil Hobbs
>>>>
>>>> PS: Amazing how we're actually talking about electronics at the moment!
>>>
>>> Maybe use a visible part? They seem to get the most development effort
>>> lately. I'll measure the capacitance on some of the right-angle
>>> surface-mount Osram parts we use. They are blindingly bright, clearly
>>> on at 1 uA in normal office lighting.
>>>
>>> The red response of a silicon detector isn't much below the IR peak.
>>>
>>> And now, back to politics...
>>>
>>> John
>>
>>
>> http://catalog.osram-os.com/catalogue/catalogue.do;jsessionid=6AC83F9F110FC71BC37646EE19F1BDDE?act=downloadFile&favOid=0200000200003436000100b6
>>
>> I measured a red one of these at 9 pF, orange at 13.5. I have no idea
>> what the optical power output may be, or the ctr you can get into a
>> silicon detector. We consider 5 mA to be "bright" on the red and
>> green, 10 mA for the orange and blues. "Dim" is 1/10th that.
>>
>> These are really nice led's. The colors are bright and pure, the
>> orange being especially nice looking. And they are dual-shot moulded,
>> so they don't melt when you solder them.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>Hmm, interesting. The red ones specify about 7 lumens/W at 635 nm. The
>photopic response there is about 22% of the peak value, or 138 lumens/W,
>which makes these ones about 0.05 mW/mA, which is a bit on the low side.
>I definitely like the capacitance though!
>
>Cheers
>
>Phil Hobbs

Yeah, I guess 635 isn't red enough.

John

From: Phil Hobbs on
On 2/5/2010 1:37 PM, Joerg wrote:
> Phil Hobbs wrote:
>> I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz, < 50 pF) for an optical feedback
>> gizmo. I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued.
>> Other possibilities are:
>>
>> Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
>> Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
>> Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
>> Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec
>>
>> It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
>> (especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
>> currents (5-10 uA).
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>
> This one is too big, too much capacitance, but they have smaller plastic
> versions, maybe give them a ring?

How retro. ;) I'll do that, thanks.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
From: Phil Hobbs on
On 2/5/2010 2:13 PM, miso(a)sushi.com wrote:
> On Feb 5, 8:56 am, Phil Hobbs<pcdhSpamMeSensel...(a)electrooptical.net>
> wrote:
>> I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz,< 50 pF) for an optical feedback gizmo.
>> I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued. Other
>> possibilities are:
>>
>> Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
>> Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
>> Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
>> Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec
>>
>> It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
>> (especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
>> currents (5-10 uA).
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Phil Hobbs
>>
>
> Isn't low current and high speed mutually exclusive, like intelligence
> and Republicans?
>
Nice try, Soup. ;) I enjoy talking electronics too much though.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
From: Joerg on
Phil Hobbs wrote:
> On 2/5/2010 2:13 PM, miso(a)sushi.com wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 8:56 am, Phil Hobbs<pcdhSpamMeSensel...(a)electrooptical.net>
>> wrote:
>>> I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz,< 50 pF) for an optical feedback gizmo.
>>> I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued. Other
>>> possibilities are:
>>>
>>> Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
>>> Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
>>> Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
>>> Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec
>>>
>>> It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
>>> (especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
>>> currents (5-10 uA).
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Phil Hobbs
>>>
>>
>> Isn't low current and high speed mutually exclusive, like intelligence
>> and Republicans?
>>
> Nice try, Soup. ;) I enjoy talking electronics too much though.
>

His "email address" always makes me crave miso soup and sushi. So, we
just went to the Japanese restaurant in town ...

But this time I had pork teriyaki after the miso soup. We usually have
sushi in the evenings, I can't really work after that, it's so good that
I tend to eat too much of it.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Jim Thompson on
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:43:30 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:13:02 -0800 (PST), "miso(a)sushi.com"
><miso(a)sushi.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
>>
>>Isn't low current and high speed mutually exclusive, like intelligence
>>and Republicans?
>
>Ah, politics!
>
>I wonder why lefties always assume that conservatives are stupid.
>That's the "what's wrong with Kansas?" dilemma, the lament that the
>working class won't toe the party line and follow the lead of their
>betters.
>
>Conservatives generally assume that lefties are both stupid and evil.
>
>John

....lefties are both stupid and evil _and_ pathological liars.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prev: PIC18 Timer 2 weirdness
Next: 100GHz transistors