From: Phil Hobbs on
I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz, < 50 pF) for an optical feedback gizmo.
I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued. Other
possibilities are:

Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec

It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
(especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
currents (5-10 uA).

Any suggestions?

Thanks

Phil Hobbs

PS: Amazing how we're actually talking about electronics at the moment!


--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
From: Fred Bartoli on
Phil Hobbs a �crit :
> I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz, < 50 pF) for an optical feedback gizmo.
> I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued. Other
> possibilities are:
>
> Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
> Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
> Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
> Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec
>
> It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
> (especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
> currents (5-10 uA).
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks
>
> Phil Hobbs
>
> PS: Amazing how we're actually talking about electronics at the moment!
>
>

Shh. Don't feed the Jiant Troll :-)

--
Thanks,
Fred.
From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:56:15 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:

>I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz, < 50 pF) for an optical feedback gizmo.
> I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued. Other
>possibilities are:
>
>Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
>Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
>Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
>Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec
>
>It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
>(especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
>currents (5-10 uA).
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>Thanks
>
>Phil Hobbs
>
>PS: Amazing how we're actually talking about electronics at the moment!

Maybe use a visible part? They seem to get the most development effort
lately. I'll measure the capacitance on some of the right-angle
surface-mount Osram parts we use. They are blindingly bright, clearly
on at 1 uA in normal office lighting.

The red response of a silicon detector isn't much below the IR peak.

And now, back to politics...

John

From: Phil Hobbs on
On 2/5/2010 12:25 PM, John Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:56:15 -0500, Phil Hobbs
> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
>> I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz,< 50 pF) for an optical feedback gizmo.
>> I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued. Other
>> possibilities are:
>>
>> Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
>> Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
>> Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
>> Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec
>>
>> It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
>> (especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
>> currents (5-10 uA).
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Phil Hobbs
>>
>> PS: Amazing how we're actually talking about electronics at the moment!
>
> Maybe use a visible part? They seem to get the most development effort
> lately. I'll measure the capacitance on some of the right-angle
> surface-mount Osram parts we use. They are blindingly bright, clearly
> on at 1 uA in normal office lighting.
>
> The red response of a silicon detector isn't much below the IR peak.
>
> And now, back to politics...
>
> John
>

I looked, but I haven't found any with speed and capacitance specs. If
you can find any that are quick and have an output of above 0.5 W/A,
that would be perfect. (Because each photon has more energy, you need
more photons for a given photocurrent, and it's a photocurrent that's
the desired output--it's sort of a special-purpose dorked optocoupler.
Smaller would be good too.

The IR ones have been really bright for awhile--the 15-year-old DN401s
(corrected P/N) are very nearly as efficient as the newest ones, and
only a factor of 2 slower. The IRDA application is why they need speed
specs, and nobody does IRDA in the visible.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
From: Joerg on
Phil Hobbs wrote:
> I need a fast IR LED (> 20 MHz, < 50 pF) for an optical feedback gizmo.
> I have some Stanley DN310s, but they've been discontinued. Other
> possibilities are:
>
> Vishay TSFF5410 -- 870 nm, 0.% W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 125 pF typ
> Vishay VSLB3940 -- 940 nm, 0.4 W/A typ 15 ns rise/fall, 70 pF typ
> Panasonic LNA4905L -- 880 nm, 0.3 W/A min 30 MHz typ, no other specs
> Osram SFH4550 -- 850 nm, 0.5 W/A typ 12 ns rise/fall, no C spec
>
> It would be really nice to find something with a flat front facet and
> (especially) lower capacitance, because it has to work at quite low
> currents (5-10 uA).
>
> Any suggestions?
>

This one is too big, too much capacitance, but they have smaller plastic
versions, maybe give them a ring?

http://www.texas-photonics.com/txpi1000_datasheet.pdf


> Thanks
>
> Phil Hobbs
>
> PS: Amazing how we're actually talking about electronics at the moment!
>

That can change in milliseconds :-)

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Prev: PIC18 Timer 2 weirdness
Next: 100GHz transistors