From: Warren Oates on
In article
<michelle-3EAD93.11075703052010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote:

> I disagree; that period arguably began in 1928 with Gernsback's Amazing
> Stories. Heinlein and Asimov were first published (in Astounding) in 1938.
>
> By 1956, the modern SF era was already about three decades old.

I'll go with Gernsback and the magazine era. It's fun to start with Mary
Shelley, though ...
--
Very old woody beets will never cook tender.
-- Fannie Farmer
From: Charlie Gibbs on
In article <w9z39y9uex3.fsf(a)zipcon.net>, kkt(a)zipcon.net (Patrick Scheible)
writes:

> The Foundation trilogy deserves to be on that list. It's hackneyed
> now, but that's mostly because it's been copied so much.

But to stay on charter, there's a brief description of a wonderful
computer interface in Foundation's Edge, the fourth book in the
trilogy. (Thank you, Douglas Adams - I'm sure Asimov would be
tickled by that phrase.)

--
/~\ cgibbs(a)kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855.
/ \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!

From: Peter Flass on
Michelle Steiner wrote:
>
> And, despite almost universal opinion to the contrary, I include Heinlein's
> The Number of the Beast.
>

I thought that was one of his most disappointing books.

To bring this back to computers, I liked Piper's _The Cosmic Computer_.
Actually, I like everything he wrote.
From: Peter Flass on
Lewis wrote:
>
> And HG Wells. I would put Frankenstein and Verne and Wells in the
> "Pre-SciFi" age. SciFi really developed as a genre in the post WWII
> period, and yes, I would say that 1956 was still the early days of that
> period.
>

I was going to date it from the 30's. Wikipedia says Gernsback founded
_Amazing Stories_ in 1926. I'd say the pulps were the start of modern S-F.
From: Tom Harrington on
In article
<a8563890-deb9-4237-a6e5-5eca9ea77d78(a)p2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Mensanator <mensanator(a)aol.com> wrote:

> On May 2, 9:25�pm, Lewis <g.kr...(a)gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> > I would say _Tiger, Tiger_ (Renamed _The Stars My Destination_ for the
> > US) is the best sci-fi book ever written. What is even more remarkable
> > is that is was written over 50 years ago during the early days of
> > Sci-Fi. It reads very much like a book from the early 80's in many
> > ways.
>
> That was a good story, like the Harry Potter series, it's just that
> I would hardly call it sci-fi. Like Harry Potter's magic, it would
> more appropriately be called Fantasy.
>
> Teleportation, mind reading, "seeing" electromagnetic radiation,
> c'mon!
> What utter nonsense.

Visible light is part of the electromagnetic spectrum. I can see it.

I'm guessing that's not what happens in the book, though.

--
Tom "Tom" Harrington
Independent Mac OS X developer since 2002
http://www.atomicbird.com/
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: Scanning to a multipage pdf?
Next: Apple co-branding