From: Joe Pfeiffer on
Lewis <g.kreme(a)gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> writes:
>
> that takes a very narrow view of what teleportation is. there are
> certainly ways around that. The transporters in Star Trek or the
> teleporter in Blake's 7 have a differing view and they are certainly
> SciFi.

Depends on how much handwavium you allow before you call foul.

>> You wouldn't last very long when you re-appeared. And don't most FTL
>> schemes
>> employ some work-around that doesn't actually involve going faster
>> than
>> light?
>
> There is nothing that forbids traveling faster than light. The
> prohibition is on traveling AT the speed of light.

And on accelerating to the speed of light -- you've used up all the
energy in the universe before you hit the division by 0.

> The trick is in figuring out how to jump from slower than light to
> faster than light without ever moving AT the speed of light.

And since we don't have any way to change velocity instantaneously....
--
As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should
be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours;
and this we should do freely and generously. (Benjamin Franklin)
From: Charles Richmond on
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Lewis <g.kreme(a)gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> writes:
>
> [snip...] [snip...] [snip...]
>
>> The trick is in figuring out how to jump from slower than light to
>> faster than light without ever moving AT the speed of light.
>
> And since we don't have any way to change velocity instantaneously....

Hey, I've been working on instantaneous velocity!

It's a replacement for the airlines. You step through a door in
Chicago, and step out of a door in Los Angeles. And your bags go
to Mexico City... (I said it was a replacement for the airlines!)

;-)


--
+----------------------------------------+
| Charles and Francis Richmond |
| |
| plano dot net at aquaporin4 dot com |
+----------------------------------------+
From: Charles Richmond on
Jennifer Usher wrote:
>
>
> "Charles Richmond" <frizzle(a)tx.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:hrl2eq$bv8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> Jamie Kahn Genet wrote:
>>> I'm just re-reading Steven Levy's 'Hackers' and wondering what might be
>>> missing from my personal library of computer history. I love reading
>>> about the era (especially the amazing people and their achievements)
>>> that I _just_ missed (I'm 32 and only got my own computer when I was 20
>>> :-\ ).
>>>
>>> Books like 'Hackers' and 'Where Wizards Stay Up Late' enthrall me. I'd
>>> give a lot to go back to the late 70's and be one of the first with a
>>> personal computer *sigh* People like Richard Greenblatt and Steve
>>> Wozniak are my heros, if I can be said to have any. They changed the
>>> world in powerful ways that most people are simply unaware of.
>>>
>>> Anyway - what are your all-time favourite books about computers,
>>> technology, and the people involved?
>>>
>>> Once I get home I'll compile a list of my books and post it here. But
>>> don't let that delay you sharing! I'd be interested in your take even on
>>> books I own.
>>>
>>
>> Try these books:
>>
>> The Computer from Pascal to von Neumann by Herman Heine Goldstine
>>
>> A History of Modern Computing, 2nd Edition (History of Computing) by
>> Paul E. Ceruzzi
>>
>>
>> The following book has some personal insights, but does *not* always
>> get the technical facts right. For example, he calls the PDP-10 a
>> minicomputer, when obviously it is *not*:
>>
>> Accidental Empires by Robert X. Cringely
>>
>>
>> The next book is very interseting but does play fast and loose with a
>> lot of the facts IMHO:
>>
>> Fire in the Valley by Freiberger and Swaine
>>
>>
>> There are *many* other books on computer history. Check the following
>> web page *below* the outline for a list of computer history books:
>
> Another good source of computer history is the Jargon File, which has
> been published as "The New Hacker's Dictionary" and which is available
> for free at: http://catb.org/jargon/index.html. While it is not a
> history book, it contains a lot of history. And it is an enjoyable read.
>
> There are also a number of good books on the history of Apple, such as
> "Insanely Great," "iWoz," "Cult of Mac," and "Apple Confidential 2.0."
> And there are several books on the history of Silicon Valley, including
> a relatively new one, if I recall the title is "Silicon Valley," which
> has quite a few photos showing the history of the Valley, both past and
> present. And, if you get the chance, a visit to the Digital Computer
> Museum in Mountain View is worth the effort. There you can see things
> like an Apple I, and the very first mouse.
>

How about the American Computer Museum in Bozeman, Montana???

http://www.compustory.com/


And don't forget the Charles Babbage Institute at the University
of Minnesota:

http://www.cbi.umn.edu/

--
+----------------------------------------+
| Charles and Francis Richmond |
| |
| plano dot net at aquaporin4 dot com |
+----------------------------------------+
From: William Hamblen on
On 04 May 2010 05:37:23 GMT, Lewis
<g.kreme(a)gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:

>In message <61rut5dq8lnv1qvedahc1cm4nika0t991c(a)4ax.com>
> William Hamblen <william.hamblen(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>> On 03 May 2010 02:25:52 GMT, Lewis
>> <g.kreme(a)gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>
>>>I would say _Tiger, Tiger_ (Renamed _The Stars My Destination_ for the
>>>US) is the best sci-fi book ever written.
>
>> The novel first saw print under the title The Stars My Destination as
>> a serial in Galaxy magazine, but was renamed Tiger, Tiger for its
>> first book publication in the UK.
>
>I think you have that wrong. It was serialized as Tiger Tiger, is still
>known as Tiger Tiger in most of the world, but the official title of the
>book is _The Stars My Destination_

It was first serialized as The Stars My Destination. Here is a scan
of a magazine cover:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4d/TheStarsMyDestination.jpg

Back in the day I wasn't allowed to spend my 35 cents on science
fiction magazines.

Bud
From: Peter Flass on
Patrick Scheible wrote:
>
> No... pretending physics remains static is silly. What would a
> physicist of 500 years ago have thought of atomic power and weapons,
> the internet, GPS, etc. etc. For space flight stories, we should
> assume alien races would be millions of years ahead of us, not 500.

Someone of Newton's generation would have been quite happy with atomic
physics. Put your lead into a reactor instead of some retort and out
comes gold. Obvious.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Prev: Scanning to a multipage pdf?
Next: Apple co-branding